Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: Julie is HOT (and so is TV in a FLASH)

January 9, 2006 10:00 AM PST

Supreme Court won't hear spam appeal

  • 2 comments
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from an online dating service that claimed it had the right to send unsolicited e-mails to thousands of University of Texas e-mail accounts.

In 2003, the University of Texas blocked thousands of unsolicited e-mails sent to its users by White Buffalo Ventures, an Austin, Texas, start-up that specializes in establishing online-dating services for third-party customers. The site in question was LonghornSingles.com, which targets the university's vast student population.

In February 2003, White Buffalo legally obtained a list of all of the university's "nonconfidential, nonexempt" e-mail addresses by filing a Freedom of Information Act request, according to the text of a federal appeals court opinion (click here for PDF) released in August.

Soon thereafter, the University of Texas received several complaints by students receiving "unsolicited e-mail blasts" from the company, according to court filings. Citing its Board of Regents' general policy against solicitation, the university ordered the spamming to stop. When White Buffalo didn't listen, the university had its IP addresses blocked.

White Buffalo responded with a lawsuit, alleging that the federal Can-Spam Act pre-empted the university's policy and that blocking its IP addresses violated the company's First Amendment right to free speech.

A federal trial court in Western Texas sided with the university, and a three-judge panel at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in August.

The appeals court also concluded that the Can-Spam Act wasn't intended to prevent Internet service providers, including those run by public universities, from filtering spam--though the court did suggest that the University of Texas could have taken narrower steps to do so. The case appeared to be the first to address that aspect of Can-Spam.

Neither the university nor White Buffalo Ventures could be immediately reached for comment Monday.

CNET News.com's Declan McCullagh contributed to this report.

See more CNET content tagged:
university, CAN-SPAM Act, spam, IP address, IP

Add a Comment (Log in or register)
A taste of their own medicine
by Get_Bent January 9, 2006 8:42 PM PST
Someone please post the "nonconfidential, nonexempt" e-mail addresses for the boneheads who run White Buffalo Ventures. I want to send them unsolicited e-mail blasts and claim protection by the Can-Spam Act.
Reply to this comment
Amazing!
by Mark Donovan January 10, 2006 1:49 AM PST
It's amazing this issue went as far as it did in the judicial system. What a colossal waste of resources, time and energy! In a sense, it's unfortunate the court did not accept the case. No doubt it has better things to do. One can only hope the resulting lawyer's bills will drive White Buffalo Ventures into bankruptcy.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.03%) 2.87 10,229.81
S&P 500 (-0.11%) -1.20 1,091.88
NASDAQ (-0.28%) -5.95 2,148.11
CNET TECH (-0.00%) -0.00 1,568.28
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right