SunPower boosts solar panel output

SunPower, which makes solar cells and panels, says it has boosted the efficiency and size of its solar panels, yielding substantially more electricity than current panels.

The San Jose, Calif.-based company on Monday announced its second-generation, higher-power product at the Solar Power 2006 conference, and the panels are expected to be in mass production next year.

SunPower says it has managed to increase efficiency of the silicon cells from 20 percent to 22 percent. Further, the 5-foot by 3-and-a-half-foot panels will pack 96 individual cells within them, compared to the 72 contained in the company?s current product.

Overall, these changes result in a 43 percent increase in power, said Julie Blunden, vice president of external affairs at SunPower. Each panel can generate 315 watts of electricity and will have roughly the same cost per watt as the existing line, she said.

The theoretical limit of monocrystalline silicon cell efficiency is about 25 percent, Blunden said.

Other companies are developing solar photovoltaic manufacturing techniques around other materials, notably CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide).

But SunPower, which is owned by Cypress Semiconductor, intends to continue investing in higher solar efficiency and ways to lower the cost of installation, Blunden said.

[charlie_c]

43% increase is wrong.

The right increase percentage is 38.94736%.

Charlie

[atici]

Solar/Wind power? Don't think so.

I don't quite get why people get so excited about wind/solar power. The energy it produces is so little compared to the growth of civilization's demands. Not to mention they're extremely cost inefficient but the real question is will they supply us for another 50 years? I doubt it.

Certainly we should protect the environment. But instead we should focus on eliminating coal/oil energy plants which are responsible for most of the pollution and replace them with efficient and powerful alternatives that could meet the future supply.

In that sense, I am confident that the only real solution is nuclear power based on a far modern design (such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_amplifier ). Fusion might be long way ahead but fission energy can be far greener than the public thinks.

[ralfthedog]

All power is solar.

All energy on the Earth is solar. Oil and coal are just dead plants that lived off of solar energy. Winds are driven by solar heating. Hydro electric is powered by solar evaporated water re condensing as rain on higher land. Even nuclear power came from the core of old dead stars.

The key is to learn to use the energy we have in a more efficient manner. Using solar panels for shingles is still too expensive (The more of us who do it, the cheaper it will get). Everyone can add insulation to there houses and upgrade/calk there windows.

Over the long term we can not use more energy than the total solar output collected by the Earth. Anything we burn more than that is deficit spending.

[francissawyer]

Let's harness human flatulence.

It's renewable, and entertaining.

[ralfthedog]

Please back up your point with facts.

If you want to call me an idiot that is cool.

However you will look like one yourself if you don't point out any flaws in my thinking. The arguments I am making were first proposed by Freeman Dyson, a gentleman considered to be one of the smartest men alive.

With a name like spacebuff I would think you would know who he is.

You sir, may not be an idiot, however if you study hard you one day may reach that level of intelligences.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_Dyson

[m.o.t.u.]

Solar Power

Some of these comments are well wide of the mark. The time for dissecting or correcting each other's input is past. I know people who already have solar and water self sufficient housing. It is time to act. It is already possible. If you live in a country that consumes up to 30 per cent of OUR planet's resources then it is especially incumbent on you to make a difference right now.

[captainjoe]

more too it

There is more to solar and wind than meets the eye or the article.
My wife and I lived aboard our sailboat for almost 8 years relying on solar and wind for our energy requirements. Admittedly, we were working with a 12 VDC system, but the principle is the same for higher voltages. The panels we used were about the same size as the article and generated 51 watts each. We used 4 in parallel for a total panel output of 204 watts. But that was 12 amps @ 17.2 VDC (I know, that comes out to 206.4 watts). We had a voltage limiter installed which fed our batteries a max of 14.8 volts so we would not cook them.. So the actual usable output was about 177.6 watts. Our efficiency was therefore, 86 % based on available to actual. The rest was lost to heat.
Our windmill put out about 70 watts @ 10 knots of wind, and supplemented our solar, especially on overcast (& windy) days. There were times when we had to supplement wind/solar with our diesel engine, but with the massive house battery bank we had aboard, we could go for 4 days before we had to run the engine. We could also charge out starting batteries at the same time, if needed.
With the new breed of solar panels, one would have been sufficient for our daily energy requirement of 1.2 KW. We had TV, stereo, navigation instruments (GPS (2), Loran), 3 VHF radios, autopilot, inverter for small power tools, etc., but we were energy conscious, too.
To supply energy using wind/solar for a community, it must be converted into a useable form. Most present homes rely on the good old 120 VAC, and every time you convert to a different form of the energy, you lose a minimum of 10 %. It is therefore imperative that those conversion losses be kept to a minimum.
The major problem with energy today, is not that we don?t have enough, but the population is growing to fast and generating excessive demand. When I was born, the population in this country was about 30 % of what it is today. The huge population growth plus all the so called convenience items on the market, including computers, cell phones, IPods, whatever, all contribute to energy demands. More people, more air conditioners, more washers, dryers, rechargeable devices and on & on. And that is just this country. The same situation exists world wide.
I wouldn?t quibble about the numbers in the article. Look further and apply some basic math and ask what the useable output is. Ask how the energy is converted to something that can be transported to where it is needed, and then, at the end of the pipeline, ask just how much of the 315 watts are available for use. I wouldn?t be surprised that it is in the neighborhood of 60 %.
There is just a little more to it than numbers, young fellas.

[Seaspray0]

Proven results

One practical use of solar power that has been around for decades... the calculator. Some watch makers have been cashing in on this as well. I wouldn't mind a watch where I never have to replace the battery. These items are small scale, but atleast it's a start.

[ronwinton]

High efficiency might be meaningless

Efficiency could be meaningless if the panel has a poor negative tolerance rating ! Their 200 and 215 watt solar panels only had a negative 8 percent negative tolerance rating.

Many solar panels on the market have a better negative 5 percent tolerance rating (Lower is better) For example their 215 watt solar panel has a negative 8% tolerance so this manufacturer would only guaranty that you would get 197.8 watts right out of the box even though you paid for 215 watts.

It says so right on their specification sheet, see (peak power tolerance) So if this new panel only has a peak power tolerance of negative 8 percent, you would be paying for 315 watts but they will only guaranty that you'll get 289.8 watts right out of the box. So much for efficiency !

[the_piano_man]

The solution to the "energy" problem is not "big" it is "small". Each individual has to make an effort. Large nuclear power generating plants are NOT the solution, nor are any large power generating plants - this outdated concept only puts the "power" in the hands of the rich. Unusable material from nuclear power plants stays dangerous for tens of thousands of years and provides weapons to those who want to do others harm. Each individual must be given the power to provide their own energy needs through education, and ethical governmental leadership. If "we the people" of this country (the U.S). really wanted to, we could change our lives for the betterment of all. A major change in living style MUST happen, particularly in the "developed" nations such as the U.S. - particularly in the U.S. - an energy glutton - yes, we are: huge massive "buses" for each soccer mom to drive - power boats and other energy suckers used for petrol sports, 5000 plus square foot wooden castles with 3 garages for all the suv's and humvees - ridiculous. Wind power works, so does solar power - if you have not tried it and say it won't work, you speak with empty words and an empty mind and show it. If our government spent as much money and political effort developing alternative energy sources such as solar power and wind power for the individual as they do on the hate and death of war, we would be far better off.