September 22, 2006 3:30 PM PDT

Sun shareholders: We want say in exec pay

Related Stories

Sun shake-up hits execs, grid service

September 15, 2006

Sun layoff hits hundreds

August 3, 2006

Charges weigh down on Sun's revenue jump

July 25, 2006
Sun Microsystems Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz got a sizeable raise in fiscal 2006 along with his promotion to the top post, but some shareholders are concerned the company's executive compensation has been too generous.

Schwartz's salary and bonus increased to $1.47 million in fiscal 2006, which ended June 30, from $1.09 million the year earlier, according to a Sun regulatory filing this week. In addition, Schwartz, who took over the CEO job in April from Chairman Scott McNealy, was granted restricted stock worth $12.97 million and 2.9 million stock options that vest over a period of years.

After years of struggling, Sun has restored some of its financial health, making gains in the server market in the second quarter and posting revenue that outpaced Wall Street expectations. Thousands of employees have lost their jobs at the Santa Clara, Calif.-based company along the way.

Now two shareholders want to have a say in how Sun compensates its executives. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Pension Plan and the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds have proposed a measure that shareholders be permitted to vote, though only in an advisory capacity, to approve the board's compensation committee reports. Shareholders will vote on the measure Nov. 2 at the company's annual shareholder meeting.

The two shareholders cited McNealy as an example.

"In our view, senior executive compensation at Sun has been excessive in recent years. In 2005, Chairman and then-CEO Scott McNealy received $1,233,039 in salary and bonus of 1,250,000 options, and exercised 4,800,000 stock options for $11,841,600 in value realized. At the same time, Sun was selected to the 2005 Focus List of underperforming companies by the Council of Institutional Investors," according to the proposal. "We believe that the current rules governing senior executive compensation do not give stockholders enough influence over pay practices."

Sun's board advised that stockholders vote against the measure. "The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee...believes that the current structure is appropriately balanced and competitive to accomplish the crucial task of recruiting, retaining and motivating talented senior executives in the highly competitive technology industry in which Sun competes," the board said in the filing.

See more CNET content tagged:
shareholder, senior executive, Sun Microsystems Inc., Jonathan Schwartz, compensation

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Jonathan is a smart guy
He is surely a smart guy and he is really steering Sun Micro into a profit path. He was responsible for the many big changes at SUN.
Let us give him 1 more year to really prove in the profitability arena ( probably SUNW to go
to double digits ? slurp.. ).
Posted by pokiri (98 comments )
Reply Link Flag
bottomline
All that the share holders are asking is "Show me the Money". Even when people are talking about another slowdown in economy esp. in 2007 (if it is already not there in Q4 of 2006). These guys are paying up themselves sky-rocketting compensations without delivering profit.

Scott McNealy was smart too, but he could not get the company out on to profitability and spent most of his time amd efforts, taking cheap shots at MSFT.
Posted by YankeePoodle (785 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.