SAN JOSE, Calif.--Increasingly, the personal computer is a relic.
So asserted Jonathan Schwartz, president of server and software maker Sun Microsystems. Instead, what has become important are Web services on the Internet and the mobile phones most will use to access them, he argued at a Friday speech here at a meeting of the American India Foundation.
"The majority of the applications that will drive the next wave of innovation will be services, not applications that run on the desktop. The real innovation is occurring in the network and the network services," Schwartz said.
Sun, which sells the back-end infrastructure that powers such services, has promulgated variations of this message for years. But there's evidence the idea has some merit.
Schwartz points to the increasing wealth and power of companies, like eBay, Google, Yahoo and Amazon.com, that profit from free services available over the network. Among his audience, many more people said they'd rather have access to Internet services than their desktop computing applications. And Microsoft--the company with the biggest financial stake in the PC software business--has struggled to cope with the arrival of Web services.
The threat to PCs is twofold. Not only are services moving to the network, Schwartz said, but PCs won't be the way people use those services--particularly in poorer areas of the world that have risen higher up Sun's corporate priority list. Instead, that access will come through mobile phones.
"The majority of the world will first experience the Internet through their handset," Schwartz said.
When it comes to aiding developing regions' digital development, "Our collective generation believes the desktop PC is the most important thing to give to people. I don't buy that. The most important thing to give is access to the Internet."
Since Schwartz became Sun's president last year, the company has touted a campaign to bridge the digital divide, for example by promoting freely available open-source software such as OpenOffice.org. Schwartz doesn't pretend his company's motives are altruistic, though.
"Clearly it's in my company's best interest to have 50 million people in sub-Saharan Africa join the network," Schwartz said.
But he does argue that there's more to be gained from pervasive network access than just a restoration of Sun's financial health and improvement to its stagnant stock price. The network also helps bring value to society, he said.
"The Internet has clearly become, as electricity and railroads did before it, a social utility," Schwartz said.
One case in point was visible with the online classified ad site Craigslist during the effort to cope with the Katrina hurricane that devastated states on the Gulf Coast. And he expects more with the approach of the next storm, Rita.
"The Internet--and one organization in particular called Craigslist--played an absolutely central role to recovery efforts," Schwartz said. "While the Federal Emergency Management Agency was stumbling and trying to figure out how to present its information, Craigslist was providing a connection vehicle for people who wanted to find their friends, their family members, their pets."
I hope we don't have to go back through all the crap about thin clients again.
If I am not mistaken all of suns attempts to move everything to a thin client system have failed and people have lost interest.
A few things will move to a server based model but there will always be plenty of reasons (digital photos, personilization, file storage, gaming, development, software piracy etc.) that will keep the PC around for a long time.
This statement from Schwartz has a desperate feel to it.
Obviously Schwartz isnt an IT person. An IT person knows that for the vast majority of users the only way you will get their PC from them is to ply it from their cold dead fingers.
Yeah, it was going to be a big deal, Microsoft Office not on your PC but on the Web, all apps rented, not bought (all the better for the software companies).
Then reality hit, but apparently someone must have been in a coma.
Perfectly stated. The subscription model for music is a dud, take that Napster, why would anyone want to "rent" software online? Pay as you go only goes so far.
This from a company barely hanging on? Oh yeah, he's plugged into the market place. He should have said Microsoft is so yesterday. More people would have noticed.
If Mr. Sunny wants to help the world (starting with me), then he needs to bring the cost of wireless data access down. Cell phone Internet access is outrageously expensive. And do I really want to have to keep track of how many bytes I accessed over the carrier's network, lest I experience sticker shock on my next bill? Oh, and how about the stupidity of having your cell phone device tied to your carrier? Let's see, I shell out $200 for a spiffy new cell phone, and then it becomes a worthless piece if junk if I switch carriers. Mr. Sunny can knock the PC all he wants. The reality is that with it, I have Internet acccess for $14.95 a month (all I can eat), T1 speed, a 19" monitor and full size keyboard, gigabytes of storage, and I can run whatever app I want. I am not locked in to just the web service apps the carrier decides to provide to me. And most importantly, I am not forced to junk my PC if I switch Internet providers.
Mr. Sunny, your future is the past. It is a few big oligarchs controlling what I can access, when I can access it, and how much I pay for it. If the oligarchs decide to hike prices by 15%, that is my tough luck. I am locked into their apps, so what choice do I have? You may like this paradigm, but I sure as hell don't, and I don't think the good people of sub-Saharan Africa will like it either. They won't like it anymore than they will like the terminator seeds that Monsanto wants to sell them to lock them in and take away their freedom.
Another paranoid that thinks the "man" is keeping them down. The "big oligarchs" are not the main issue. The Wireless industry in general is bogged down with state and local rules, ancient federal laws that were written by industry idiots, and greedy municipalities bent on tacking tax after tax.
Strip all that from the provider and open up true market place competion then you'll see prices come down.
Internet on handhelds? That's great, except the internet is hard enough to understand on a "real" computer, not to mention on a 2.5" screen. Sun wants to provide internet to subsaharan areas? That's great, except if there was a business there, someone would be there already. Believe me, what sets those regions apart from wealthier nations is NOT their lack of access to stock quotes and writing brief meeting notes (which is what handheld units are good for). If Sun wants to supply those areas with an infrastructure then why hasn't it done so already? Go to it.
Once upon a time there were many folks who tried to make all personal properties a relic. Still, the idea of having some personal property, including Personal Computer (personal library, personal toothbrush, etc.) is rather popular.
I am a graphic designer. I can imagine doing my work on anything but a PC. I am sure there are many other occupations that are the same way. The author is mistaken.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
If I am not mistaken all of suns attempts to move everything to a thin client system have failed and people have lost interest.
A few things will move to a server based model but there will always be plenty of reasons (digital photos, personilization, file storage, gaming, development, software piracy etc.) that will keep the PC around for a long time.
This statement from Schwartz has a desperate feel to it.
Then reality hit, but apparently someone must have been in a coma.
that Napster, why would anyone want to "rent" software online? Pay
as you go only goes so far.
into the market place. He should have said Microsoft is so
yesterday. More people would have noticed.
Mr. Sunny, your future is the past. It is a few big oligarchs controlling what I can access, when I can access it, and how much I pay for it. If the oligarchs decide to hike prices by 15%, that is my tough luck. I am locked into their apps, so what choice do I have? You may like this paradigm, but I sure as hell don't, and I don't think the good people of sub-Saharan Africa will like it either. They won't like it anymore than they will like the terminator seeds that Monsanto wants to sell them to lock them in and take away their freedom.
The "big oligarchs" are not the main issue. The Wireless industry
in general is bogged down with state and local rules, ancient
federal laws that were written by industry idiots, and greedy
municipalities bent on tacking tax after tax.
Strip all that from the provider and open up true market place
competion then you'll see prices come down.
Peace, comrade.
$14.95 and 56 kbps? typical...
$14.95 and DSL lite,? possibly but not likely....
But $14.95 and T1 is pure BS
Right.. the PC is sooo yesterday... my eye. C'mon, Sun. Get a new idea.