Sun Microsystems filed a countersuit Wednesday against Java hardware maker Azul Systems, arguing that the start-up infringed six Sun patents and misappropriated trade secrets to build its Java hardware.
In addition, the server and software company argued that Azul Chief Executive Stephen DeWitt, a former Sun employee, violated an agreement not to compete with Sun, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose for the northern California district. That's the same court in which Azul filed a pre-emptive lawsuit in March against Sun , in search of an opinion that Azul didn't infringe 20 Sun patents.
According to Sun's countersuit, "Azul developed products and product strategy based on Sun's innovation rather than its own. By hiring away key former Sun employees, Azul improperly accessed Sun's technology and plans, which enabled Azul to accelerate introduction of its products to market."
In a statement, Azul attorney Bob Haslam said there are "no surprises" in the Sun suit.
"Sun's original set of allegations claimed an even longer list of patents and unspecified trade secrets than what is in their complaint filed today. This leads us to believe that we were right in seeking declaratory relief and we are confident we will prevail," he said. "This suit is not about Azul technology; this suit is about Sun and its predatory attempt to thwart Azul's innovative solution from penetrating the market."
Azul sells hardware that's designed to centralize the execution of Java programs that run on servers. Sun argued that Azul's systems use features Sun developed for its UltraSparc T1 "Niagara" chip and the servers that are based on the chip.
Sun said Azul lured away at least eight technical employees as well as marketing executive Shahin Khan. "Many key Azul employees are former Sun employees who now work on the same or substantially similar technology as they did when at Sun. A number of Sun employees left Sun to join Azul at or around the same time that DeWitt joined Azul...These employees were specifically targeted for recruiting by Azul," according to Sun's countersuit.
The UltraSPARk is under the GPL license so it promotes market competition through ownership rights of distribution and innovation. But apparently the employees are not.
"According to Sun's countersuit, "Azul developed products and product strategy based on Sun's innovation rather than its own. By hiring away key former Sun employees, Azul improperly accessed Sun's technology and plans, which enabled Azul to accelerate introduction of its products to market."
To me I wouldn't sign my inventiveness away to a company or; it should be illegal in a free market economy in America. People are allowed to quit and start another job if they want in this country.
pay your key employees acordingly and they will stay
Reward the good ones, fire the poor ones(fast). Big companies should start appreciating the good engineers and get rif of those rigid reward structures. Don't start whining when your good engineers leave for a competitor. Pay them well and they will stay. (most of them at least).
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
"According to Sun's countersuit, "Azul developed products and product strategy based on Sun's innovation rather than its own. By hiring away key former Sun employees, Azul improperly accessed Sun's technology and plans, which enabled Azul to accelerate introduction of its products to market."
To me I wouldn't sign my inventiveness away to a company or; it should be illegal in a free market economy in America. People are allowed to quit and start another job if they want in this country.
Big companies should start appreciating the good engineers and get rif of those rigid reward structures.
Don't start whining when your good engineers leave for a competitor. Pay them well and they will stay. (most of them at least).