- Related Stories
-
Apple cues up iPods on a plane
November 14, 2006 -
The iPod at 5
October 20, 2006 -
Apple taking iTunes to the movies?
September 11, 2006 -
Apple unveils video iPod, new iMac
October 12, 2005
Nielsen Media Research gathers its first data on the audience for Apple's device, calling into question the prevalence of video viewing.
The story "Study questions popularity of iPod video" published November 20, 2006 at 11:22 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.




about?
The formats are limited to mp4 and h.264, though. Not a
problem unless your format of choice is primarily distributed
through peer to peer networks, which may explain why divx and
Xvid is not native to the iPod. You could always use an open
source converter to recode your videos if you are part of the 2%
of people who would actually try to watch them on an iPod.
As far as battery life goes, it's about the same for anything that
plays video.
Have a nice day!
customers - from the beginning. That is why he resisted adding
it to the iPod early on like many other companies did for their
own offerings. But although people may not be watching movies
or videos on their iPods, they are certainly using them to move
their media around. iPods are great pocket-sized high capacity
hard drives.
For watching movies, however, there is no match for a big
honkin' flat screen TV on the living room wall.
Have a nice day!
is replace my 32" wide screen TV...!!!!
capability and monoscreen. I didnt buy it for pretty pictures or
TV progs. I bought it for my music collection and whatever
music I will add to it.
If (or when) I replace my ipod, I have no interest (at the moment)
of watching movies or TV anyway. All I want is something that I
can listen to music on, enjoy podcasts and audio books and use
as a back up device - if I need one.
The only reason for me considering replacing my Ipod would be
to get one with a better battery life and reduced size! And right
now, the replacement would clearly be another Ipod.
put time and effort into doing a study..., other wise they wouldn't
have much of a business plan by doing studies for free.
Again I ask..., who plopped down the bucks to find this info out?
I noticed the iPod was singled out amongst other video players out
there as well. No mention of other video players in study.
flying.
flying.
It's just hard to believe that the same people who are willing to spend ten times the amount of a standard CRT in order to have 60" flat panels will EVER be willing to squint at that itty-bitty screen just for the novelty of it.
I don't need anyone to tell me wether the iPod is popular or not, I know it is and it's the best MP3 player on the market, IMHO, but facts numbers are numbers.
The best small format content uses a lot of close-ups, "talking
heads", this is good for training applications and informationals
(iPod VideoCasts),
I want more content. The Alfred Hitchcock series is fabuolous, but
I'd LOVE the Original Twilight Zone series! Both the Hitchcock and
TZ actually work relatively well on small screens because, as I
stated earlier, the use of head shots, great dialog, closeups.
However, if I'm walking somewhere, it's much easier to play music (all I need do is listen, I can hold the iPod however I want) than to play video (I need to hold the iPod a specific way and look at it instead of looking where I'm going).
So I don't really see major adoption of mobile TV/video except by people who are commuting some way besides driving a car, and frequent travellers.
Thank you!
iPods.
Have a nice day!
In commercial Hi-Tech world, the product is just as good as its User Interface; this rule is equally applicable to the software development and hardware design.
Regards
Dr. Alexander Bell
Infosoft International Inc,
NY
- Lamest article EVER
- by tedk7 May 5, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
- Video capacity is used a fraction of the time of audio capacity?
- Reply to this comment
-
(28 Comments)WOW THATS NEWS! You know many folks use their ipods while
walking, running, riding, working out, or partying, right?
This article isn't worth the server disk space it occupies, let alone
the bandwidth to pull it down and the time it took to read.