Read more on Cloud Computing
September 14, 2006 12:27 PM PDT
Study: Vista could create 50,000 jobs in Europe
- Related Stories
-
Piecing together Windows Vista
November 8, 2006 -
Microsoft wants more Vista testers
September 14, 2006 -
Microsoft unveils Vista-friendly peripherals
September 13, 2006 -
Microsoft releases new Longhorn Server build
September 13, 2006
In "The Economic Impact of Microsoft Windows Vista," a white paper released on Thursday, IDC analysts emphasized that while Vista will earn Microsoft a great deal of money, far more will be generated by European companies within the Microsoft "ecosystem."
"If you add up all the spending on hardware and software that runs on Microsoft operating systems, as well as all the services around installing and maintaining Microsoft applications and solutions, you quickly come up with a number much bigger than Microsoft's revenues," IDC's John Gantz, Al Gillen and Marcel Warmerdam wrote in the study.
In the six countries studied, more than 150,000 IT companies will produce, sell or distribute products or services running on Windows Vista in 2007 and will employ 400,000 people, IDC said. Another 650,000 will be employed in the IT departments of businesses that rely on Vista.
The study covers Germany, the U.K., France, Denmark, Poland and Spain, which collectively account for more than 65 percent of IT spending in the European economic zone (the EU, plus Croatia, Norway and Switzerland). "(These countries) are quite representative of Europe as a whole and, for that matter, much of the developed world," the IDC analysts wrote.
A key finding is that Vista will not just sustain the existing Windows economy, but create thousands of new jobs. Using a baseline for economic growth due to existing versions of Windows, the research firm determined that Windows-related employment would jump by 100,000 jobs next year.
"IDC believes that more than half of the gain in Windows-related employment will be specifically related to Windows Vista. It is growth that IDC believes would not occur were Windows Vista not in the market," the IDC analysts wrote. "Windows Vista...will infuse significant new energy into the market in its first 12 months of shipment, driving important job growth and new industry revenues."
Microsoft in hot seat
In recent years, Microsoft has funded a number of studies highlighting the positive side of its near-monopoly in the market for desktop operating systems (it faces significant competition on servers, notably from Linux). The studies have appeared as Microsoft has faced antitrust actions in the U.S., the EU and elsewhere, with regulatory attention most recently beginning to focus on Windows Vista ahead of its scheduled January launch.
Microsoft has also faced growing movements from some national and regional governments to promote or require open-source alternatives to Windows. One of the arguments governments have used in favor of open source is that it can foster a locally based software economy.
The IDC white paper outlines the immense local ecosystem derived from Windows in Europe.
Within the six countries, more than 20 percent of all IT employment will be Windows Vista-related in the first 12 months of deployment. That figure should grow substantially in 2008, when IDC expects Vista to account for 80 percent of Microsoft client operating systems shipped to enterprises. Thirty million computers in the six countries will run Vista in its first 12 months, and 105 million worldwide.
Moreover, for every euro of revenue that Microsoft makes, companies within the IT ecosystem will, on average, make more than 13 euros, IDC found. In the U.K., hardware companies are expected to see 7.24 euros of revenue, software companies 3.64 euros and services companies 2.74 euros per euro of Microsoft's Vista revenue, for a total of 13.62 euros.
According to Microsoft, that's not a bad payback for an investment that's such a modest part of companies' overall IT budgets--1 percent of the 214 billion euros the region will spend on IT in 2007 and roughly 5 percent of the packaged software spend.
"The economic opportunity Windows Vista creates for small and large companies across the region is clearly much more significant," said Jean-Philippe Courtois, president of Microsoft International.
European companies may not be directly involved in developing Vista, but they are participants nonetheless, IDC said.
"Windows Vista is not just a product of Microsoft. In the marketplace, it will be a constellation of solutions and services delivered by an entire ecosystem," according to the white paper. "The launch of Windows Vista will precipitate cascading economic benefits, from increased employment in the region and increased taxes to a stronger economic base for those 150,000+ local firms that will be selling and servicing products that run on Windows Vista."
Antitrust timing
Such benefits may help explain why it's only relatively recently that Microsoft has faced antitrust actions. "Microsoft does create economic opportunities, and that's probably why they didn't get slapped around by the Department of Justice sooner--it wasn't taking all the money for itself," RedMonk principal analyst James Governor said.
In 2000, the Department of Justice found that Windows was an illegal monopoly, and originally intended to break up the company. The European Commission in 2004 found that Microsoft had illegally used its Windows client monopoly to expand its market share in servers. Microsoft has not yet complied with all antitrust remedies, according to the Commission.
Some critics say that looking at jobs and economic growth doesn't tell the full story. For instance, a monopoly may create jobs, but can harm innovation, according to antitrust authorities. "If you want to foster a local product-based economy, there is certainly an argument that says it may not be beneficial if there are companies with aggressive policies that try to limit local companies' ability to grow and innovate," Governor said.
Open-source advocates, particularly in poorer countries, argue that dependence on Microsoft and other overseas-based, proprietary software companies may not allow the development of high-level IT skills in the local economy. That was the argument made in a famous open letter written to Microsoft by Peruvian congressman Edgar Villanueva in 2002.
"In respect of the jobs generated by proprietary software in countries like ours, these mainly concern technical tasks of little aggregate value," Villanueva wrote. In September 2005, Peru approved a Villanueva-sponsored bill promoting the use of open-source software by the government.
Matthew Broersma reported for ZDNet UK in London.
See more CNET content tagged:
employment, ecosystem, study, Microsoft Windows Vista, economy
24 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Well, Vista is bloatware requiring either hardware upgrades (more components sold = jobs!) or a replacement PC (more PCs sold = jobs!). Never mind all the extra accountants Microsoft will need to employ to count the insane profits they'll rake in for the overpriced OS itself.
Sadly, all Microsoft has to do is make sure that European PC OEMs are pressured into installing Vista by default on new PCs (e.g. threats to OEM volume discounts if they install no OS or an alternative OS) and the money will roll on.
Sadly, no major OEM has the guts to give their customers a choice of no OS, a non-MS OS (e.g. some Linux distro) or Windows on a typical desktop machine, so Windows just gets pushed out there *not* because it's the best OS, but because Microsoft has an entrenched monopoly position and vice-like grip on OEMs, who are scared witless of losing their discounts!
I mean I'm sorry. I feel Microsoft has some decent technology and some good points, but it shouldn't be forced down everybody's throats.
The fact that it requires new hardware certainly isn't something I'd brag about, either.
Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
MS software engineering at its finest.
The so called new jobs, are merely the existing ones reassigned, and glosses over the massive equipment and software upgrades costs etc!
But then again who really cares?, when the largest installed software desktop base is still actually Windows 2000!
Choices, to do or not to do, that be the question?
COught, cought, hahahahahahaha
MS just wants the EU to think that so they
pass Vista, and Rome maybe blsses it, I sincerely doubt there will be that many job created, this is FUD.
Upgrade to rediculous minimum requirements
Deal with bad drivers
Create workarounds for communication issues with other systems
Deal with bugs
Deal with worm to strike within 1st 2 weeks of release
Upgrade software that won't work
I dont see new jobs, just new hassles for IT staff
Roberto
THE VISTAPOCALYPSE LOOMS!
praise a job well done?
- Microsoft already did;
- CNet reported it as "job well done"....
It happens about twice a year.
|
At an average salary of UK£30,000 that would mean Vista adding 1.5^52 or roughly UK£1.5 BILLION to the European economy. Thats US$2,823,734,500 DOLLARS. I don't think so.
|
"IDC believes that more than half of the gain in Windows-related employment will be specifically related to Windows Vista. It is growth that IDC believes would not occur were Windows Vista not in the market,"
|
I fail to see the logic. What will Vista bring to these companies that cannot be already done with Open Source solutions. Since when did an Operating System promote growth in an economy. For most companies its a negative on the balance sheet.
|
"Moreover, for every euro of revenue that Microsoft makes, companies within the IT ecosystem will, on average, make more than 13 euros, IDC found"
|
Does anyone really believe these numbers. Assuming a third party actually produces a big selling product. For each unit it sells it pays for another license. The revenue of which goes back up the pyramid.
|
Someone I know who produces drivers for medical diagnostic equipment tells me the company spends one fifth of its budget annually on software licenses alone. I asked why they don't move to Open Source. He replied that they were so tied to the one platform that it would be too disruptive to move. So here we have a company making vital strategic decisions based on what software vendor they buy from.
one concentrates on the European market; well - Europeans should know how it works, long practice, monopolies - usually state monopolies -
were used there to sell various goodies - from booze to matches; at some point whoever wanted to supply lighters would have to pay the local
match-monopoly to have his lighters "approved", just like the hardware vendors do today with their Windows drivers: they pay Microsoft to have
them "approved" - whatever that means. There was also a time when in Russia it was illegal to throw a drunk out of the bar, as long as he had
his shirt still on - and therefore could pawn it with the bartender to keep drinking and contributing to the well-being of the Russian Empire in the only way he knew how; only the shirtless drunks were - eventually - thrown into a snow bank. This enlightened system did not put undue strain of the upper body frostbite epidemic on the health system for the simple reason that a public health system did not exist in Russia at the time. It's a pity IDC was not around either, because if it was - we would most likely learn how beneficial to Russian economy the system was, how many bar tending jobs it created, how much extra business it driven for the booze distilleries, what were the benefits of second-hand shirt market it created, what were the direct and indirect benefits to doctors, healers, witch doctors and quacks... Unfortunately - without IDC study - we will probably never know...