July 12, 2004 10:43 AM PDT

StorageTek wins copyright injunction

A federal judge in Massachusetts has granted a preliminary injunction against a consulting firm that allegedly violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act when performing maintenance on StorageTek tape backup systems.

U.S. District Judge Rya Zobel ruled that Storage Technology, better known as StorageTek, is likely to prevail in its lawsuit against a consultancy named Custom Hardware Engineering and Consulting, saying the controversial 1998 copyright law was violated when Custom Hardware effectively tricked a tape backup unit into believing that its technicians were granted full access to the system's internals.

StorageTek "is likely to succeed on the merits of all three of the claims asserted in support of the motion for a preliminary injunction," Zobel said in a ruling July 2. The other two arguments the company raised were copyright infringement and trade secret violations.

The StorageTek case is one of a series of lawsuits that are testing the boundaries of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which Congress enacted in response to growing fears about Internet piracy. Section 1201 of the DMCA says that in general, nobody may "circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access" to a copyrighted work.

Some computer manufacturers and a vocal contingent of computer scientists are seeking to revise that section of the DMCA and have thrown their support behind a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives. The measure would permit circumvention as long as no copyright infringement is taking place--a requirement that, based on Zobel's ruling, would not help Custom Hardware.

A StorageTek system typically includes up to 24 control units that can hold hundreds of terabytes. A system contains thousands of tapes and a robot arm that manipulates them.

Zobel ruled that Custom Hardware violated the DMCA by tricking the "GetKey" security system into activating proprietary "maintenance code" that activated functions like event logging and a special user interface.

Custom Hardware circumvented "GetKey to gain access to the maintenance code and then resetting the maintenance level," Zobel wrote. "They thus stealthily obtain plaintiff's event messages, which they transmit to their own computers in Tucson, Ariz. From that data, defendants' service personnel learn what repair functions need to be performed."

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Let the bits fly
The DMCA should be obliterated like a hard drive in a electrical storm. That law was passed by technical illiterate legislators that buckled under to side talking industry lobbyists. Having little knowledge of what they actually voted on at the time, its only now that they realize the mistakes that we're made. Let the bits fly!

Those that try to use the DCMA against their customers and dealers should suffer the same fate as the hard drive that crashes in thunderstorms.

With Warmest Regards,

Francis Brock
Don't let the copyright become the copywronged
Posted by (7 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Sounds like. . .
a really good reason to dump anything built by
StorageTek. If it cannot be fixed by a third party,
it probably has severe problems in the first
place. Like Iomega 250MB Zip Drives
suffering from the "click of death". Customers
only need to be burned so many times, before
they start premtively marking down companies
as "useless vendors". By their actions,
StorageTek has joined this list.
Posted by boomslang (65 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.