May 14, 2007 1:21 PM PDT

State AGs to MySpace: Turn over sex offender data

Eight state attorneys general have authored a letter to MySpace.com requesting that the social-networking site turn over data pertaining to registered sex offenders who use the service.

The signers represent the states of Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania. In the letter, dated Monday, the attorneys wrote that they are "gravely concerned that sexual predators are using MySpace to lure children into face-to-face encounters and other dangerous activities." They cited estimates from Sentinel Tech Holding that suggest there may be "thousands" of registered sex offenders with MySpace profiles. That figure surpasses a Wired magazine writer's recent tally of 744.

"Sex offenders have no business being on this site," North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said in a statement. "We believe MySpace has a responsibility to get them off the site."

The attorneys' letter requests that MySpace respond by May 29 with a count of how many registered sex offenders' profiles have been found on the site. Additionally, they ask that MySpace disclose how it is dealing with those sex offenders' removal from the site, explain how it alerts other members who may have communicated with them, and how law enforcement officials are being informed.

In January, MySpace was sued by the parents of several teenage girls who were allegedly assaulted by adults whom they met on the site. While MySpace has a history of compliance with investigations like these, and offers some safety measures of its own, many lawmakers remain critical that it's still not doing enough.

"We agree with the attorneys general that keeping bad people out of good places on the Internet is a challenge and a priority," Hemanshu Nigam, MySpace's chief security officer, said in a statement from MySpace that was released Monday afternoon. "We are in the initial stages of cross referencing our membership against Sentinel's registered sex offender database and removing any confirmed matches."

According to Nigam, additional government action would help MySpace. "Mandatory sex offender e-mail registration legislation--which is now being considered at the federal level and in several states," he said, "would significantly expedite this process and help keep sex offenders off our sites."

See more CNET content tagged:
MySpace, Hemanshu Nigam, attorney, News Corp., North Carolina

87 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
For those that have done there time
this is yet another legal form of discrimination.
Even though it is entirely possible to only use MySpace to speak only with adults aparrently several States Attorneys General, have determined that these particuler ex-cons cannot use MySpace.

By all means monitor them if you feel you must, but there is no justification to single out those who have done their time with extra prohibitions that are not equally applied under the law.
Posted by PzkwVIb (462 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Not for sex offenders
I personally do not believe that sex offenders can be rehabilitated. The rate of repeat offenders for sex crimes is very high compared with other crimes that people can be 'cured' of repeating. The very personal nature and lifelong repercussions for victims of sex crimes make the perpetrators basically evil individuals.

I would gladly vote for a law that restricts the rights of people found guilty of sex crimes; including the right to use popular social networking sites where children and adults can interact with each other. The catch is being found guilty vs. actually being guilty or (falsely accused). Perhaps juries can help decide the level of restriction to compensate. I wish I had a good solution for this.

I also agree that MySpace has a responsibility to police its users. It is not a substitute for good parenting. It is a measure to prevent the largest social network on the internet from becoming a haven for sexual predators whom are generally despised in our society.

This goes along the same lines as laws that the FDA has to protect the food we eat. People do not want sexual predators mingling with our children just like we do not want hamburger meat from tainted cows in our supermarkets. We trust the FDA to keep the farmers in line. Who do we trust to keep the internet safe?
Posted by NewsReader_ (280 comments )
Link Flag
You're Misinformed
You seem to not have enough information about the number of sexual predators online and the problems they have caused.

Also, these "ex-cons" are a very special group.

I developed teh first sex offender tracking system for NH State Police, so I think I come from an informed position.

I'd encourage you to read a lot more about this issue and try to understand why 6 attorneys general would get together to discuss this matter and send MySpace a letter about it.
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
What about gun prohibition?
Ex-convicts are prohibited from owning guns. Is this equally applied?
Posted by mattumanu (599 comments )
Link Flag
The Attorney Generals are just more government criminals who are perpetrating crimes. The problem is that even though their governments are flat broke, they still have way, way too much money and way, way too much free time on their hands. We need to take our money away from these criminal governments and make them about a tenth of the size they are now. Then perhaps they will be able to concentrate on only important issues that they should be concentrating on.

And I've got news for the criminal Roy Cooper - "sex offenders" have plenty of business being on sites such as MySpace or Facebook. If he truly does not agree with that then he is an abject moron. Who truly agrees with Cooper? Only morons.

Here's another bit of news for criminal Cooper - his type of activities have no place in a great country like the United States almost was and could be. The criminal governments need to end their SEX OFFENDER witch hunt and propaganda campaign. At this point, it is crystal clear that they will never pay any attention to FACTS and that their witch hunt has little to do with "public safety" or "protecting children". Crystal clear. If Cooper wants to play his little war games (like the governments do with their War on Drugs), then he needs to get the hell out of my great country and go to a country that fits people like him better. There are a lot of them.
Posted by noncitizen2009 (4 comments )
Link Flag
Silly
I see this as yet another example of technology ignorant buerocrats trying to create an appearance of "we care for your childens' safety" activity.
Anyone can open a free email account and register a profile on MySpace (or any other site for this matter) within minutes.
Perhaps one of those politicians can come up with how can any website validate users' information and still be in compliance with all the privacy laws in this country. It looks especially silly when in most states (probably including some of those states whose AGs sent this silly letter) their police officers cannot ask someone they're arresting about their immigration status (let alone whether they'er on the sex offenders list).

Silly
Posted by 2nikon (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
No Problem?
Do you see no problem with sexual predators in the community? Is this only about tech-unsavvy politicians? Paypal can verify my actual identity. Do you think MySpace won't be able to do that?

I don't think MySpace will have as much of a problem with this issue as you seem to.
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
Myspace to assume parental responsibilities?
So many lawmakers are critical of the measures that Myspace is taking to protect the kids using the site? They should be questioning the parents of these kids as to why they (the parents) are not doing more to supervise their children's online activities. Here is a news flash for those parents and lawmakers: If you leave your kids unsupervised long enough, regardless of what you think they are doing, sooner or later they are going to get themselves into trouble.
Posted by fugtruck (26 comments )
Reply Link Flag
yup
Someone has to. If not the parents that are responsible for the
childs existence, then who?

Before some arrogant wanna-be parent [1] starts up with the old
"won't someone please think of the children" garbage, think of
who you would hold responsible if you dropped your kids in a
bad neighborhood in town and left them there unsupervised for
hours on end. The internet just makes that easier.

[1] - NO, having sex and carrying a child for 9 months doesn't
make you a fit parent. Caring for the child for the next 18 years
is what parenthood is all about. If you can't live with that, you
can get an abortion in this country ... or use condoms, or "pull
out in time", or just don't have sex. If you can't do the time,
don't do the crime.
Posted by Dalkorian (3000 comments )
Link Flag
Poor parenting is not the only reason.
Last week, in Haverhill, MA, a family awoke at 3 AM to the sound of a stranger in their child's bedroom. The guy broke into the house.

Poor parenting is not always the explanation. The kid was 5 and done nothing to invite this intrusion.
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
Very Responsible Approach
As the developer of NH State Police first sex offender tracking system (it has been modified and updated since then), I believe I come from an informed position. I think the Attorneys General have a legitimate concern and their approach is appropriate. From a moral standpoint, I'm sure MySpace will have no problem with compliance either.

Maybe the previous posters haven't seen NBC's "To Catch A Predator," or have and still don't care.

Maybe they don't know how brutal a rape can be to a survivor, or that a rape victim may also be murdered after an attack. This crime is often devastating to victims' families as well.

Maybe they think everyone who is registered as a sex offender is actually someone who drunk one night, caught peeing in someone's bushes late some Saturday night, or some other trivial matter like that.

Maybe they don't know that sex offenders are classified by groups according to the severity of their crime, not just randomly assigned the label of "sex offender."

Maybe they don't know that much of the research on sex offenders indicates that they don't heal; they remain prone to reoffending. So "they did their time" is quite a different situation as compared to breaking-and-entering or drug possession, etc.

Maybe they don't know that some offenders strive to avoid detection by moving to different states and not registering (imagine that...an attacker roaming and no one in his locale knows he's dangerous). For this reason, there is a national registration database in the works.

If states have people registered as sex offenders, then these people are dangers in the community and to young MySpace users.

I'm sure MySpace will do the responsible thing and begin a program of monitoring or blocking these offenders. I think everyone else ought to be responsible enough to support them in their efforts.

Rick Bell
Boston, MA
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Reply Link Flag
If that is what you believe
lobby to have the laws changed to incarcerate sex offenders for the rest of their life. But until the laws are changed that way we have no ethical right to place any more restraints upon them after they have served their term then we do on any other citizen.

Sure we would be safer in a police state that can lock up "undesirables" indefinitely, but newsflash, freedom is sometimes messy and will not give you perfect safety, but I will take freedom.


BTW: Its funny how European research on sex offenders doesn't tar them with the same incurable recidivist brush that U.S. Law enforcement backed studies do.

Yes there are bad people out there, but until truly independent studies are done, we will just get all this "but think of the children" crap that the politicians are trying to force down our throat, and have no real measure to judge against.
Posted by PzkwVIb (462 comments )
Link Flag
Passing the buck is not responsible.
Mr. Bell, whose's responsibility is it to keep track of sexual predators? For instance if a first time offender registered predator lives and is registered in Boston, Ma, what agency is responsible to track that person?

The letter to Myspace states that some on the person are using their REAL NAMES. Isn't it the responsibility of that State where the offender is registered to keep track of what the predator is doing? Passing the buck to Myspace is not being responsible. These AG's want someone else to do the job that their own state is supposed to be doing.

Myspace, based in California, is not an arm of an AG on the East Coast. These AG need to their own local law enforcement what they have done to prevent verify registered offenders under their supervising on not on Myspace. Myspace is not to blame for a sexual offender using their real being on Myspace.

The State Agency that is supposed to tract the predators actions is to blame for allowing a predator to be on Myspace with their real name.

Passing the Buck is never responsible.
Posted by intheknow2 (14 comments )
Link Flag
Yeah. Right
It's obvious that you have a political or financial stake in the "sex
offender" business. Pretty much anything you have to say is
meaningless, pandering drivel.
Posted by Gromit801 (393 comments )
Link Flag
bang
You just shot holes in your own argument, but I gotta give you your props, spoken like a true blue LEO.

>>>
If states have people registered as sex offenders, then these people are dangers in the community and to young MySpace users.
>>>

Registered sex offenders:

rapist of old ladies
sheepherder who boffed a woolie
window peeping pervert who squirts on bushes
a drunk pissing an a parking meter
an 18 year old senior who boffed a freshman girl and got lit up by some assnine DA.

None of the above by classification are dangers to young kids on myspace yet I see no where that the AG's have classified offenders to ferret out certain ones. And EACH INDIVIDUAL STATE decides who is included and why.
Posted by CNET BITES (18 comments )
Link Flag
What about the violent felons?..
I guess there ok as long as they didn?t do anything sexual while stabbing, robbing or carjacking their victims.... Seriously this obsession with sex crimes is ridiculous all violent crimes have victims...since when is it a private company?s responsibility to act as law enforcement. Unless MySpace is actively promoting sex crimes or advertising their services as a great way to meet kids for sex they should tell the AGs to **** off and go do their jobs.
Posted by Not-a-Blogger (16 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I agree
EOM
Posted by PzkwVIb (462 comments )
Link Flag
Violent Felons Don't Target Children
Dude, dump the 'tude and get some information.
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
Here Here!
And while you are at it, tell the police to go [i]mano-et-mano[/i] with a violent AK47 weilding gang banger all hopped up on crystal meth and leave the guy with his collection of scrawny Russian 18 year old girl pictures alone.
Posted by Too Old For IT (351 comments )
Link Flag
Violent felons ARE treated different
Persons with violent criminal records ARE handled differently in almost every state. A new felony conviction after serving a previous sentence will almost always result in a vastly increased sentence, even when the second offense is not as serious as the first. In many of those states, a 2nd or 3rd serious felony conviction is an automatic life sentence without parole.

The difference between crimes such as robbery and crimes such as sexual assault is the huge amount if issues the victim suffers AFTER the attack...often fear and psychological issues last a lifetime. This is why the "special" laws for sex offenders are necessary. They should have to pay for their crimes as long as their victims are still suffering...even acquaintance, or "date" rape victims, who were not subject to any violence, have deep-rooted trauma that can take decades to get over.

Having personally been the victim of 2 aggravated assaults, one of which was with a firearm, I can attest that I can go to sleep at night without worrying one bit whether my attacker is coming back...the 2nd one got 50 years for his various crimes.

However, the personal nature of sexual crimes along with the mental anguish from the incident last a lifetime...I had a close female friend at one time who had been stalked and sexually assaulted by a former boyfriend. Her issues were many, and it affected every facet of her life and interpersonal relationships.

If you cannot see the difference between sexual assault or other violent felonies, then I suggest you volunteer for a local rape crisis center or attend a few trials of sexual assault suspects. If that does not change your mind, then I would have to say that you are either totally ignorant or just trying to plan your defense in advance when you commit a sex offense.
Posted by ctg44 (27 comments )
Link Flag
Let's use GPS
Reminds me of the pass the buck saying, "Don't tax you don't tax me tax that man behind the tree." What ever happened to personal responsibility?

I've got it. They can insert a GPS tracker up every ones *** and have that x-man guy track all of us and our whereabouts in his big cartoon head inside that hugh dome sitting on the end of his runway in his wheelchair. That way we'll all be safe and never have to think or do any parenting or say no to anyone or ever treat anyone unfairly. GROW UP!
Posted by oconnmic (28 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Let's use the X-MEN
I've got it. They can insert a GPS tracker up every ones *** and have that x-man guy track all of us and our whereabouts in his big cartoon head inside that hugh dome sitting on the end of his runway in his wheelchair. That way we'll all be safe and never have to think or do any parenting or say no to anyone or ever treat anyone unfairly.

What ever happened to personal responsibility?
GROW UP!
Posted by oconnmic (28 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Refuse-Torture like Bush does!
Without due process these attorney generals are taking from citizens. What is next? Waterboarding? Nails under fingernails? Fire (All three approved by George W Bush)
Posted by bobbydi (51 comments )
Reply Link Flag
death penalty
Is probably the right answer to sex crimes, or flogging as in Iraq. But since we dont do that, restricting the right to free speech is not the right answer either. Its too easy to involve Myspace, google etc in law enforcement. A lot of smoke but no fire.

And what is the answer to the nutbar that beat up the 92 year old vet yesterday? Take away his myspace privileges?
Posted by gggg sssss (2285 comments )
Reply Link Flag
In some states
Indecent exposure, like mooning someone, can get you on the sex crimes list. The same as an 18 year old guy and his 16 year old girlfriend could have the guy permanent labeled as a sex offender. Knowing that, makes your death penalty solution ludicrous.
Posted by PzkwVIb (462 comments )
Link Flag
Violent Offenders Don't Target Children...
...not nearly as often as sexual predators do.

Social networking is a new field on the Web. As people perpetrate crimes with the help of such websites, these businesses will be called upon by the public to do their part in minimizing the risks. In Business Ethics class, we called that social responsibility.
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
Myspace Refused to Cooperate & Help Parents Find Son
I refuse to believe that nobility is just a state mind, that it no longer exist. I refuse to believe that a helpful hand is thing of the past, that each one of us are on there own in times of need. But comes a company like Myspace.com who makes me think that it is a thing of the past.

Last Year, my family went thru some tough times as our son had a lapse of judgement and runaway. Missing for 2 weeks but now He is back, safe with us once again. I have to tell you that it was the most grueling and worst feeling I've felt in my life. I don't wish this on any mom or parent.

For days there was no clue to where we could find him then suddenly we had a break. A popular site Myspace.com have the information that would lead us to where our son is. Unfortunately Myspace.com denied us of that information, sighting that it is a PRIVACY ISSUE.

Since MySpace.com Terms of Use Agreement under #12 Disclaimers. include the following,

"Under no circumstances shall MySpace.com be responsible for any loss or damage, including personal injury or death"

I guess they do not feel any kind of responsibility or have the GOOD CONSCIENCE of divulging that information that would lead to the location of a Missing Minor Child who they are aware could be in grave danger.

I am very glad we found our son, No thanks to Myspace.com. I am also very sad and furious that such people(Myspace.com Founders, Tom Anderson & Chris DeWolfe), such company with NO GOOD CONSCIENCE exist.
Posted by RachelnCJsMom (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
To play Devils Advocate
What if your child had run away because he was abused? Then assistance rendered to the parents would only place the child back in harms way. I feel quite certain MySpace would have cooperated with a court order for the data, and obtaining a court order, even on short notice, from a family court judge should not have been terribly difficult.

Just because you love your child doesn't mean that truly abusive parents couldn't have tried to get the same type of data from MySpace for a runaway that truly needed to be elsewhere.
Posted by PzkwVIb (462 comments )
Link Flag
So sorry to hear it.
My condolences to you and your family for the experience you described. I know such things change a person. I admire you for sticking to these important ideals despite your very unfortunate circumstances.

Peace
Posted by rickbbell (18 comments )
Link Flag
How old is Son?
>> Since MySpace.com Terms of Use Agreement under #12 Disclaimers. include the following,

>> "Under no circumstances shall MySpace.com be responsible for any loss or damage, including personal injury or death"

Depending on how old the Son is, this clause is not enforceable since he may not be old enough to make a valid contract by agreeing to this waiver.
Posted by rarpsl (34 comments )
Link Flag
MySpace Should Reply: Hock up a Warrant
Nuff Said

They can't because their collective investigations are not good enough to obtain one.

Thank you for stopping by ... have a nice day.
Posted by Too Old For IT (351 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Why release?
This pertains only to the way released offenders are being treated. It does not deal with right/wrongs of the crime.

Many people want to impose heavy restrictions of where released offenders can live, work, travel to, shop, talk to, and do in life. Some want to have identifing license plates on their cars.

After they have paid their debt to society in jail, they are still heavily heavily punished.

All of these issues were restricted when they were in jail.

So if this person is really a threat to the community, they should remain in jail.

If their current jail sentences have are enough, then they should not have so many restrictions on them.

You can't monitor someone outside of jail like they are inside jail. So either stop the strict monitoring or extend the jail sentence.
Posted by mikeburek (418 comments )
Reply Link Flag
MySpace = Internet?
For all those out there who have never used the internet, there is more than just MySpace. That is such a tiny fragment of activity compared to all the other places that a person can post ideas and interact with others. How many chat rooms are being monitored? How many instant messengers are being monitored? How many blogs are being monitored? How many e-mail servers are being monitored? How many websites are being monitored? How many of these things in other countries are being monitored?

A possible explaination is that these legal issues have to be sorted out somehow, and MySpace just happens to be the testing ground. After laws are implemented, then they will be issued to all other internet sites in the world.

Or maybe many of these parents and politicians don't realize there is actually more to the internet than MySpace. Just like AOL was _the internet_ for many years for many subscribers.

You can't legislate everything in the world. But you can educate your kids.

If a child believes a 40 year old stranger who says "I want to be your friend. Come over to my house," on MySpace, well that could happen anywhere.

Have you ever noticed how many news stories report a stranger in real life approaching a child and the child reporting strange questions to parents/school officials/police? How do they know to do that? Because the kid was educated on what to do. So educate your child about what to look out for and how to respond and who to ask for guidance. Education works. So do it.
Posted by mikeburek (418 comments )
Reply Link Flag
OLD MEN = PWNED!
I am sure young women will like any grey haired men who put comments on their webpage like:

Hi there pretty lady you sure are sexy!

If I was a girl and got that from a 56 year old man I would puke!
Posted by inachu (963 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Screw the AGs
I gotta ask, if the registered sex offenders are to be treated as criminals for life, then why are they allowed out of jail? Either they've served their time or they haven't. This constant, "what about the children," ******** is enough. Either sentence them to life or let their time be done when they're shown the prison exit.

Just because MySpace (et. al.) <i>can</i> be used in a certain way does not automatically mean that any given individual <i>will</i> use it that way. MySpace is a private entity and, as such, should be allowed to conduct it's business in a reasonable manner. But, when you have a government and a public that's used to dictating "social responsibility" to everyone and everything but themselves, when neither the government nor the public displays any in themselves, what do you expect?
Posted by ferricoxide (1125 comments )
Reply Link Flag
"Protect the children" Privacy is for Criminals
Here we go again, "Protect the children" let's get rid of all our constitutional rights because if we use them, well then we must be CRIMINALS!!!

Please spare me. Protect the children????????

How about: "PROTECT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!"

Such as remember your: "RIGHT TO PRIVACY"
REMEMBER: "YOUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS"
REMEMBER: "YOUR RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT"
REMEMBER: "YOUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH"
REMEMBER: "YOUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS"

No, instead we have pure scum losers who sit back and say, yeah I don't like sex offenders and go along with whatever politician's tie into that. Instead people look at the FACTS, you yes you the person who thinks they are educated yet only went to Ball State or some other mediocre school, WAKE UP you are being suckered into losing all your rights and they are slowly bleeding you of them, No I'm not saying PANIC BIG BROTHER IS HERE TODAY, I'm saying look up the definition of slippery slope and really spend atleast 2 hours thinking about exactly what that means. WAKE UP, we are giving too much power to a police state. LAW ENFORCEMENT in this country is getting out of hand, where very soon there will be only 2 kinds of people. COPS or CRIMINALS, if you are a COP (Law Enforcement) you will be protected by the brotherhood unless you do something truly outrageous such as a cold-killing caught on video. If you are not a COP you will get a DUI,CHILD NEGLECT,SEX OFFENDER STATUS for simply watching porn in your home and having an underage child happen to catch a glimpse viewing through your window without your knowledge,YOU WILL ARGUE ON AN AIRPLANE WITH A FLIGHT ATTENDANT ABOUT A MIXUP WITH YOUR DRINK REQUEST AND BE BRANDED AS A TERRORIST..NEED I GO ON????

Wake up AMERICA??? If you truly want to protect the children, then do not allow your government to break all your constitutional rights.

That goes for Democrat's and Republican's, yes you're the responsible one's as it's your leaders who allow this to happen.
Posted by enigma.live (48 comments )
Reply Link Flag
DUI OFFENDER'S TOO
Next thing these idiot lawmaker attorney general's will do is say we need to remove DUI Offenders from MYSPACE TOO, since the way DUI LEGISLATION is going, they will soon have some prosecutor in a state like ARIZONA that does not protect your constitutional rights charge you with a DUI if you've been drinking and have been on the internet. They will say that the internet is a superhighway and therefore a public road and that your laptop is a vehicle accessing that public road and therefore you should be found guilty of a DUI. DRINKING WHILE ON MYSPACE. If you don't believe me, go to DUIBLOG dot com and see for yourselve's.
Posted by enigma.live (48 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Bullshit
Myspace like any other blogs, websites or social networks are not
babysitters. Maybe the parents have to teach their kids not to meet
strangers and be stop being ******. I get tons of emails from
young girls and I just ignore them, simple as that. Why spend all
this money, time and effort to stop this problem? Just say ignore
them. Geesh
Posted by digiguy23 (73 comments )
Reply Link Flag
MySpace DELETED all profiles of known sex offenders
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://p2pnet.net/story/12237" target="_newWindow">http://p2pnet.net/story/12237</a>
Posted by btljooz (401 comments )
Reply Link Flag
MySpace DELETED all profiles of known sex offenders
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://p2pnet.net/story/12237" target="_newWindow">http://p2pnet.net/story/12237</a>
Posted by btljooz (401 comments )
Reply Link Flag
This is B.S.
I am a registered sex offender, and have had my account deleted twice. I have my account settings set to no one under 18 may view my page, and also that you have to know my email or last name to become a friend. Yes I mad a mistake when I was 21, but I am not a predator. Too many people mistake sex offender as sexual predator. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING... I did my time and learned from my mistake. Furthermore, the only female I ever contact on myspace is my fiancee`, the rest of my friends are actual friends and family that are above the age of 18. This is a gross misconduct of government powers, because they say the sex offender list is not a punishment, but just a list. I have seen this as a punishment because it has stopped me from finding a suitable job for my qualifications and a decent place to live. Now I am being punished again for something I did 5 years for already... Sorry about the rant, but this is absurd.
Posted by Wolfy1978 (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
has anyone here been to myspace? Do you really think your kids should be hanging out there anyway. I went to take a look and hey I can hook up with married women that want to cheat on there husbands. Guess they wouldn't mind a young teenage boy after all what's wrong with that. How about your kids filling out all the forms on myspace. Like what kind of sex do you like or tell me about your body. I would think any parent that let their kid to even be on that site would be guilty of endangerment. i would like to see these parents prosecuted. Keep the kids off myspace. I think this is much more and issue then if sex offenders are on this site. Wake up people if you want to protect your kids don't let them sign up. Would you let them go to a singles club at 13? Or maybe hang out at the local strip bar in the parking lot.
Posted by lifesucks2 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.