Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

September 9, 2005 3:25 PM PDT

Start-up gives online shopping a makeover

  • 36 comments
If you do enough online shopping, you've probably been there.

You enter four or five Web pages of personal information to purchase a sweater or book, then decide to add something to your order. You click back. You start over. You get an error message. A sudden urge to hurl the mouse across the room comes over you, and then you give up.

Shopping cart abandonment--it's been a thorn in the side of e-retailers and shoppers alike for years. Allurent, a 12-person start-up based in Cambridge, Mass., has set out to tackle the problem with Web animation technology.

The company's shopping cart program is designed to let consumers easily revise an order at any stage of checkout within a single online form. Shoppers don't need to download anything to run the application because it relies on Macromedia's popular Flash Player, already installed on most computers.

Allurent, which has been in stealth mode for the past year, plans to release the product and launch the company on Monday with the mission of creating a more compelling online shopping experience. The company's three founders, Joe Chung, Fumi Matsumoto and Paul Shorthose, have put their heads together on this subject before.

In 1991, they founded Art Technology Group, a publicly traded company that supplies e-tail software to American Airlines, Best Buy, Target and dozens of other big names. Other people associated with Allurent include Nicholas Negroponte from the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and former MIT Chairman Alex D'Arebeloff. Both are angel investors.

Chung, Allurent's chief executive, claims that online stores are ripe for renovation. That's because the tools for navigating them haven't really changed much since the early '90s. Web stores are mainly based on Hypertext Markup Language, or HTML.

Although HTML pages are a trusted and familiar interface, they have drawbacks for shoppers, Chung said. For one thing, it takes time to load pages. HTML also dictates the order of events--enter shipping information first, then billing information, etc. And HTML is more static compared to the more animated Flash-based programs.

"That whole interaction is kind of clumsy," Chung said.

The rise of high-speed Internet access and dynamic Web applications like Flash are combining to make online shopping a much slicker experience, Forrester Research analyst Harley Manning said. And shopping carts are just the beginning.

Browsing and product search are getting makeovers, too. "It's an idea that's reached a tipping point," Manning said. "Bandwidth is faster, processing is faster, and people are building these more sophisticated sites."

Up until now, such work has largely been the domain of Web design companies, including Molecular in Watertown, Mass., which built a Flash-based checkout program for T.J. Maxx, Manning said.

TravelClick, which caters to hotel chains, offers a Flash-based, single-screen room-booking system. But Allurent is one of the first software makers to offer tools to let companies build such sites themselves.

"It's going to be a while before we know if this thing plays out successfully or not," Manning said of Allurent. "But no question, someone is going to make a business out of this."

In a demonstration, Allurent's application looks quite nifty. Shoppers can flit around the screen, changing billing and shipping information and the content of their shopping baskets in any order, without ever clicking the Back button.

The application instantly detects incomplete information, such as a credit card number or ZIP code with too few digits, and prompts the shopper to fix it. Pictures of other merchandise scroll across the bottom of the page. Shoppers can browse the products and return to checkout as they left it.

The application is designed to be automatically downloaded to the shopper's computer at the start of the process, so there's no waiting for servers to deliver Web pages. The program is also meant to tap into the computing power of the shopper's desktop, so it can make calculations and respond to changes as quickly as, say, a Microsoft Office program.

With a $150,000 price tag, Allurent's program is aimed at retailers with deep pockets. The company is initially targeting the top 200 largest retailers in the United States, Chung said. He's already signed up one of them, he said, a household name that he declined to identify. Such investments can pay off, it seems. Shoppers using Flash-based systems completed orders 50 percent more often than people using HTML-based ones, according to a recent Forrester study.

See more CNET content tagged:
shopper, shopping cart, HTML, Massachusetts, billing

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)
RE: Start-up gives online shopping a makeover
by ragjunk September 9, 2005 4:53 PM PDT
If their software is as good as they show it in the demo, then God should save their company. It took a long long time to load on both IE and Firefox on a 2GHz Windows XP machine and just didn't work thereafter. Most of the times, using the shopping cart is frustrating because they are designed poorly. Some dynamic HTML/Javascript/CSS can produce slick interfaces where the user can go back and forth without losing anything on the shopping cart. Flash is not a good answer, since the online merchants cannot assume that their users have it loaded. Turning customers off because of the choice of technology is not an option for online merchants.

My 2 cents.

Peace.
Reply to this comment
Worked Fine on My Machine
by markdoiron September 10, 2005 4:11 AM PDT
the demo worked fine on my machine.

one positive thing i'll say about this flash shopping cart: finally someone is coming up with a purpose for flash other than to cause annoying eye-candy affects that detract from the web browsing experience. personally, i use firefox and i have a plug in that disables all flash until i click on it. much more preferable than ceding control of my computer to a programmer with a different agenda than mine.

mark d.
View reply
RE: Start-up gives online shopping a makeover
by ragjunk September 9, 2005 4:53 PM PDT
If their software is as good as they show it in the demo, then God should save their company. It took a long long time to load on both IE and Firefox on a 2GHz Windows XP machine and just didn't work thereafter. Most of the times, using the shopping cart is frustrating because they are designed poorly. Some dynamic HTML/Javascript/CSS can produce slick interfaces where the user can go back and forth without losing anything on the shopping cart. Flash is not a good answer, since the online merchants cannot assume that their users have it loaded. Turning customers off because of the choice of technology is not an option for online merchants.

My 2 cents.

Peace.
Reply to this comment
Worked Fine on My Machine
by markdoiron September 10, 2005 4:11 AM PDT
the demo worked fine on my machine.

one positive thing i'll say about this flash shopping cart: finally someone is coming up with a purpose for flash other than to cause annoying eye-candy affects that detract from the web browsing experience. personally, i use firefox and i have a plug in that disables all flash until i click on it. much more preferable than ceding control of my computer to a programmer with a different agenda than mine.

mark d.
View reply
RE: Start-up gives online shopping a makeover
by ragjunk September 9, 2005 4:53 PM PDT
If their software is as good as they show it in the demo, then God should save their company. It took a long long time to load on both IE and Firefox on a 2GHz Windows XP machine and just didn't work thereafter. Most of the times, using the shopping cart is frustrating because they are designed poorly. Some dynamic HTML/Javascript/CSS can produce slick interfaces where the user can go back and forth without losing anything on the shopping cart. Flash is not a good answer, since the online merchants cannot assume that their users have it loaded. Turning customers off because of the choice of technology is not an option for online merchants.

My 2 cents.

Peace.
Reply to this comment
Worked Fine on My Machine
by markdoiron September 10, 2005 4:11 AM PDT
the demo worked fine on my machine.

one positive thing i'll say about this flash shopping cart: finally someone is coming up with a purpose for flash other than to cause annoying eye-candy affects that detract from the web browsing experience. personally, i use firefox and i have a plug in that disables all flash until i click on it. much more preferable than ceding control of my computer to a programmer with a different agenda than mine.

mark d.
View reply
RE: Start-up gives online shopping a makeover
by ragjunk September 9, 2005 4:53 PM PDT
If their software is as good as they show it in the demo, then God should save their company. It took a long long time to load on both IE and Firefox on a 2GHz Windows XP machine and just didn't work thereafter. Most of the times, using the shopping cart is frustrating because they are designed poorly. Some dynamic HTML/Javascript/CSS can produce slick interfaces where the user can go back and forth without losing anything on the shopping cart. Flash is not a good answer, since the online merchants cannot assume that their users have it loaded. Turning customers off because of the choice of technology is not an option for online merchants.

My 2 cents.

Peace.
Reply to this comment
Worked Fine on My Machine
by markdoiron September 10, 2005 4:11 AM PDT
the demo worked fine on my machine.

one positive thing i'll say about this flash shopping cart: finally someone is coming up with a purpose for flash other than to cause annoying eye-candy affects that detract from the web browsing experience. personally, i use firefox and i have a plug in that disables all flash until i click on it. much more preferable than ceding control of my computer to a programmer with a different agenda than mine.

mark d.
View reply
MX is passe now
by September 10, 2005 8:39 AM PDT
Don't ya guys think HTML/AJAX wud have been a better choice? I can see this effort taking off from the petstore demo, and it is a good effort, but I think flash is slowly fading away and AJAX is IN.
Reply to this comment
MX is passe now
by September 10, 2005 8:39 AM PDT
Don't ya guys think HTML/AJAX wud have been a better choice? I can see this effort taking off from the petstore demo, and it is a good effort, but I think flash is slowly fading away and AJAX is IN.
Reply to this comment
MX is passe now
by September 10, 2005 8:39 AM PDT
Don't ya guys think HTML/AJAX wud have been a better choice? I can see this effort taking off from the petstore demo, and it is a good effort, but I think flash is slowly fading away and AJAX is IN.
Reply to this comment
MX is passe now
by September 10, 2005 8:39 AM PDT
Don't ya guys think HTML/AJAX wud have been a better choice? I can see this effort taking off from the petstore demo, and it is a good effort, but I think flash is slowly fading away and AJAX is IN.
Reply to this comment
what happen to sessions?
by bit-looter September 10, 2005 11:07 AM PDT
I thought sessions (java's HttpSession and others), where suppose to deal with the whole statelessness of HTTP thing. I don't know anything about flash from a developer stand point so I'll reserve judgement on its use, but the article talks about the losing of data in shopping carts being a major problem for e-tailers. If you implement (via cookies or url-rewriting) sessions that shouldn't happen. As for the back button issue, a clever javascript could track what a user has typed so far and save (via cookies or on the server) it when ever they click a link to leave the current page. Isn't flash also proprietary, which would make me a little nervous to use it on the web.
Given that thier aim is for deep-pocket e-tailers, it may not be bad, i liked the demo.
Reply to this comment
what happen to sessions?
by bit-looter September 10, 2005 11:07 AM PDT
I thought sessions (java's HttpSession and others), where suppose to deal with the whole statelessness of HTTP thing. I don't know anything about flash from a developer stand point so I'll reserve judgement on its use, but the article talks about the losing of data in shopping carts being a major problem for e-tailers. If you implement (via cookies or url-rewriting) sessions that shouldn't happen. As for the back button issue, a clever javascript could track what a user has typed so far and save (via cookies or on the server) it when ever they click a link to leave the current page. Isn't flash also proprietary, which would make me a little nervous to use it on the web.
Given that thier aim is for deep-pocket e-tailers, it may not be bad, i liked the demo.
Reply to this comment
what happen to sessions?
by bit-looter September 10, 2005 11:07 AM PDT
I thought sessions (java's HttpSession and others), where suppose to deal with the whole statelessness of HTTP thing. I don't know anything about flash from a developer stand point so I'll reserve judgement on its use, but the article talks about the losing of data in shopping carts being a major problem for e-tailers. If you implement (via cookies or url-rewriting) sessions that shouldn't happen. As for the back button issue, a clever javascript could track what a user has typed so far and save (via cookies or on the server) it when ever they click a link to leave the current page. Isn't flash also proprietary, which would make me a little nervous to use it on the web.
Given that thier aim is for deep-pocket e-tailers, it may not be bad, i liked the demo.
Reply to this comment
what happen to sessions?
by bit-looter September 10, 2005 11:07 AM PDT
I thought sessions (java's HttpSession and others), where suppose to deal with the whole statelessness of HTTP thing. I don't know anything about flash from a developer stand point so I'll reserve judgement on its use, but the article talks about the losing of data in shopping carts being a major problem for e-tailers. If you implement (via cookies or url-rewriting) sessions that shouldn't happen. As for the back button issue, a clever javascript could track what a user has typed so far and save (via cookies or on the server) it when ever they click a link to leave the current page. Isn't flash also proprietary, which would make me a little nervous to use it on the web.
Given that thier aim is for deep-pocket e-tailers, it may not be bad, i liked the demo.
Reply to this comment
It did take time to load the demos, whats a Comsumer?
by educateme September 10, 2005 5:50 PM PDT
I found the demos slow loading, would hope that is more about
code refining and too much demo candy, but I think it needs
improvement there. I agree, that AJAX would seem like a natural
evolution of simplicity in HTML, rather than more preloading of a
Flash player, and then loading a Flash module for the cart each
time.

Something makes me guess that AJAX & HTML would run more
universally in most browsers, and would load faster than Flash
code. I guess it depends on how complex the display
information needs to be, as to whether this cart demo is enough
to entice big name retailers to use it.

On another note: I often make spelling errors in my posts as I
quickly type things, but in my Demos I usually proof read them,
with others. I wondered if they invented an new term, or
accidently typed in Comsumers. It could be the new thing -
ie: .Com sumers? I wonder. See the demo again for this minor
part.
Reply to this comment
It did take time to load the demos, whats a Comsumer?
by educateme September 10, 2005 5:50 PM PDT
I found the demos slow loading, would hope that is more about
code refining and too much demo candy, but I think it needs
improvement there. I agree, that AJAX would seem like a natural
evolution of simplicity in HTML, rather than more preloading of a
Flash player, and then loading a Flash module for the cart each
time.

Something makes me guess that AJAX & HTML would run more
universally in most browsers, and would load faster than Flash
code. I guess it depends on how complex the display
information needs to be, as to whether this cart demo is enough
to entice big name retailers to use it.

On another note: I often make spelling errors in my posts as I
quickly type things, but in my Demos I usually proof read them,
with others. I wondered if they invented an new term, or
accidently typed in Comsumers. It could be the new thing -
ie: .Com sumers? I wonder. See the demo again for this minor
part.
Reply to this comment
It did take time to load the demos, whats a Comsumer?
by educateme September 10, 2005 5:50 PM PDT
I found the demos slow loading, would hope that is more about
code refining and too much demo candy, but I think it needs
improvement there. I agree, that AJAX would seem like a natural
evolution of simplicity in HTML, rather than more preloading of a
Flash player, and then loading a Flash module for the cart each
time.

Something makes me guess that AJAX & HTML would run more
universally in most browsers, and would load faster than Flash
code. I guess it depends on how complex the display
information needs to be, as to whether this cart demo is enough
to entice big name retailers to use it.

On another note: I often make spelling errors in my posts as I
quickly type things, but in my Demos I usually proof read them,
with others. I wondered if they invented an new term, or
accidently typed in Comsumers. It could be the new thing -
ie: .Com sumers? I wonder. See the demo again for this minor
part.
Reply to this comment
It did take time to load the demos, whats a Comsumer?
by educateme September 10, 2005 5:50 PM PDT
I found the demos slow loading, would hope that is more about
code refining and too much demo candy, but I think it needs
improvement there. I agree, that AJAX would seem like a natural
evolution of simplicity in HTML, rather than more preloading of a
Flash player, and then loading a Flash module for the cart each
time.

Something makes me guess that AJAX & HTML would run more
universally in most browsers, and would load faster than Flash
code. I guess it depends on how complex the display
information needs to be, as to whether this cart demo is enough
to entice big name retailers to use it.

On another note: I often make spelling errors in my posts as I
quickly type things, but in my Demos I usually proof read them,
with others. I wondered if they invented an new term, or
accidently typed in Comsumers. It could be the new thing -
ie: .Com sumers? I wonder. See the demo again for this minor
part.
Reply to this comment
Flashisn't theanswer
by ahzzmandius September 11, 2005 5:18 AM PDT
Asanotherposter said, flash isn't the only answer. Ajax/javascript/xhtml/css2 combination is also capable of this and is far easier to guarantee browser compatibility with.

Client/server communications in shopping carts can be fast if the company invests in a properly deployed server setup.

And for my last point, browsers can save form information and re-fill the form easilly. Users are paranoid of doing so because of weak encryption of "saved data" in their browser. I use 128bit encryption option on Firefox and save my common information like shipping/billing details. Firefox fills in most forms for me automagically.

In conclusion, flash isn't "The Answer(tm)". It's proper use of the tools that exist (which most "webmasters"and programmers seem incapable of using properly).
Reply to this comment
Flashisn't theanswer
by ahzzmandius September 11, 2005 5:18 AM PDT
Asanotherposter said, flash isn't the only answer. Ajax/javascript/xhtml/css2 combination is also capable of this and is far easier to guarantee browser compatibility with.

Client/server communications in shopping carts can be fast if the company invests in a properly deployed server setup.

And for my last point, browsers can save form information and re-fill the form easilly. Users are paranoid of doing so because of weak encryption of "saved data" in their browser. I use 128bit encryption option on Firefox and save my common information like shipping/billing details. Firefox fills in most forms for me automagically.

In conclusion, flash isn't "The Answer(tm)". It's proper use of the tools that exist (which most "webmasters"and programmers seem incapable of using properly).
Reply to this comment
Flashisn't theanswer
by ahzzmandius September 11, 2005 5:18 AM PDT
Asanotherposter said, flash isn't the only answer. Ajax/javascript/xhtml/css2 combination is also capable of this and is far easier to guarantee browser compatibility with.

Client/server communications in shopping carts can be fast if the company invests in a properly deployed server setup.

And for my last point, browsers can save form information and re-fill the form easilly. Users are paranoid of doing so because of weak encryption of "saved data" in their browser. I use 128bit encryption option on Firefox and save my common information like shipping/billing details. Firefox fills in most forms for me automagically.

In conclusion, flash isn't "The Answer(tm)". It's proper use of the tools that exist (which most "webmasters"and programmers seem incapable of using properly).
Reply to this comment
Flashisn't theanswer
by ahzzmandius September 11, 2005 5:18 AM PDT
Asanotherposter said, flash isn't the only answer. Ajax/javascript/xhtml/css2 combination is also capable of this and is far easier to guarantee browser compatibility with.

Client/server communications in shopping carts can be fast if the company invests in a properly deployed server setup.

And for my last point, browsers can save form information and re-fill the form easilly. Users are paranoid of doing so because of weak encryption of "saved data" in their browser. I use 128bit encryption option on Firefox and save my common information like shipping/billing details. Firefox fills in most forms for me automagically.

In conclusion, flash isn't "The Answer(tm)". It's proper use of the tools that exist (which most "webmasters"and programmers seem incapable of using properly).
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (2.03%) 203.52 10,226.94
S&P 500 (2.22%) 23.78 1,093.08
NASDAQ (1.97%) 41.62 2,154.06
CNET TECH (2.03%) 31.21 1,569.61
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right