A small San Jose, Calif., company said it has been granted a preliminary injunction preventing Microsoft from incorporating a patented networking method into future versions of Windows.
Alacritech said Wednesday that the injunction blocks Microsoft from using its Chimney architecture, which Alacritech said Microsoft plans to include in both a "scalable networking pack" for Windows Server 2003 and in Longhorn, the next version of Windows.
Microsoft's Chimney software provides support for hardware that accelerates networking using the TCP/IP standard, which underlies the Internet and countless private networks. Microsoft designed Chimney to minimize compatibility issues with existing computing technology.
"After Alacritech discovered that Microsoft Chimney is based on intellectual property that we developed, patented and own, we offered Microsoft a license," Alacritech CEO Larry Boucher said in a statement. "Microsoft rejected licensing terms that would be acceptable to us. We were forced to sue Microsoft to stop them from continuing to infringe, and inducing others to infringe, on our intellectual property rights."
Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake reiterated the company's position that its Chimney technology was "independently developed."
"As an intellectual property company, we invest heavily in research and development and are committed to respecting the intellectual property rights of others," Drake said.
Alacritech sued Microsoft last August, alleging that Chimney infringes on two Alacritech patents, both titled "protocol processing stack for use with intelligent network interface device."
According to Alacritech, Microsoft first discussed plans for Chimney at a hardware conference in the spring of 2003. Alacritech said it offered to license its technology to Microsoft that October, but was rebuffed in April 2004, prompting it to file its suit.
An Alacritech representative declined to comment beyond the company's press release.
The fact that Microsoft indepedently developed its own "chimney" technology is not necessarily a defense. Patent infringement is a strict liability offense, and the lack of knowledge or indepednent development will save Microsoft from willful infringement which carries punitive damages.
Microsoft could have developed an independent chimney technology using processes or technology not covered by this company's patent. This could be true if the process is very narrow.
MS may have very well developed a system "independently" ... that doesn't mean others didn't also develop and patent similar works "independently" and earlier than MS. The US system of waiting before any publication of Patent Apps guarantees developers will be working "blind" for some period of time prior to filing their own Application.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
Whether Apple will release a new iPad next month doesn't seem to be the question as much as what day it will happen. A new rumor has it down to the day.
Tommy Jordan, the man who shot his daughter's laptop for YouTube, gets a visit from police and child protection services. Oh, and Good Morning America.
Along with green-lighting Google's buy of Motorola, the Justice Department today OKs an Apple-Microsoft-RIM partnership deal to buy Nortel patents, and Apple's plan to acquire Novell patents.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
There are a lot of things that AT&T's humongous Samsung Galaxy Note smartphone is, like a digital memo pad, a medium-size-reader, and a great photo companion.
As UC Berkeley students, the co-founders of "Back to the Roots" discovered they could grow mushrooms using recycled coffee grounds. Now their mushroom kit sells at grocery stores across the country.
Microsoft could have developed an independent chimney technology using processes or technology not covered by this company's patent. This could be true if the process is very narrow.