September 12, 2007 5:45 AM PDT
Sony unveils Blu-ray recorders to fight HD DVD
- Related Stories
-
At E3, entertainment is the name of the game
July 11, 2007 -
Sony plans TV line for Wal-Mart, Target
June 11, 2007 -
Sony sued over Blu-ray
May 25, 2007 -
Pioneer unveils revamped plasma technology
May 9, 2007 -
Sony's brave Sir Howard
January 17, 2007 -
CES 2007: Gaga for gadgets in Vegas
January 11, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
New Sony Blu-ray players, but still expensive
September 5, 2007 -
Big Blu: Sony's 200-disc Blu-ray changer, plus Blu-ray burner and 500GB HDD
September 6, 2007
Scheduled for release November 8, four recorders will accommodate dual-layer discs, offer up to 16 hours of storage.
The story "Sony unveils Blu-ray recorders to fight HD DVD" published September 12, 2007 at 5:45 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.
12 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
i won't be buying anytime soon.
They just approved DTCP-IP to handle content moved over an IP network to another device, with plenty of restrictions.
For a disc recorder to really sell in the US it must support high-def cable content. We've already seen that OTA-only HD DVRs bombed, and only those with cable support have sold. So the two camps have to convince Cable Labs to approve recording HD cable content to disc media.
I'm no longer buying CD/DVDs of any type. If it isn't available via
digital download on the iTunes store, then I'm not buying it...
I gave up using CD/DVDs as backup media a long time ago.
Is Microsoft really the second most important backer of HD-DVD, after it's developer Toshiba.
Yes, I know that Xbox has a HD-DVD add on, but realy, thats not going to make or break this format, any more than the Playstation 3 will.
You can purchase Blu-Ray drives for PCs, so I assume that Windows supports them, just as well as HD-DVD.
Surely the most important supporters of these formats are the content providers, and drive manufacturers.
I'm not arguing that Microsoft isnt a HD-DVD supporter, but wondering why they are regarded as such an *important* supporter?
Their support has nothing to do with the add on drive for the 360.
BM was a better technology, could store more info., had a better picture and sound, etc. But VHS won for 2 reasons.
1). JVC was willing to share the VHS technology whereas SONY was not.
2). The porn industry accepted the VHS technology as the tapes were less expensive, and the price dropped drastically from there.
Ultimitely, price and market acceptance will determine the victor.