November 9, 2004 4:18 PM PST
Should Microsoft own antispam?
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft debates spoofing as security flaw
November 2, 2004 -
Microsoft reworks antispam spec to silence critics
October 25, 2004 -
Microsoft-backed antispam spec gets filtered out
September 23, 2004 -
Microsoft e-mail proposal dealt setback
September 13, 2004
Microsoft's effort to convince the Internet Engineering Task Force to adopt its patented technology for e-mail authentication failed in September amid concerns it would cede too much control over the future of worldwide correspondence to one company. Since then, no progress has been made toward a resolution, engineers and lawyers said at a summit convened here by the Federal Trade Commission and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Key Internet standards currently are "freely available, no patent licensing from Microsoft," said Daniel Quinlan, a vice president of the Apache Software Foundation. "We want to make sure it stays that way for e-mail and other important parts of the Internet."
Quinlan's group, a nonprofit association, maintains the popular SpamAssassin software. In a statement, the foundation said Microsoft's proposal to authenticate senders of e-mail messages was "expressly incompatible" with the way the open-source development and distribution process works.
The summit, which ends Wednesday, comes as U.S. companies are becoming increasingly concerned about the problem of junk e-mail and "phishing" solicitations for personal data.
Some summit participants said they didn't care what standard was adopted--as long as it stopped the flow of fraudulent e-mail and Viagra solicitations. Visa, for instance, said Tuesday that it strongly endorsed the concept of e-mail authentication methods--but didn't reveal whether it preferred Microsoft's Sender ID, Yahoo's DomainKeys, or Cisco Systems' Identified Internet Mail.
David Kaefer, a director of Microsoft's patent licensing office, said Apache and other open-source advocates were ignoring "commercial realities" that require his employer to retain substantial control over its patents.
What's Hot
Discussions
Shared
-
Mac Pro petition gaining steam on Facebook
71 comments
-
Apple tinkers with iPen stylus and haptic feedback
61 comments
-
How Facebook's Zucked-up IPO just killed the tech bubble
54 comments
-
Sans cool iPad-like device, HP not catching Apple anytime soon
53 comments
-
Android, iOS nab 82 percent of smartphone market in Q1
50 comments
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
RSS
Subscribemy Yahoo
Add this FeedGoogle
Add this FeedMSN
Add this Feed