April 10, 2007 4:57 PM PDT

Senators mull new taxes to fund 911 Net upgrade

WASHINGTON--Americans may face new taxes on their phone bills to help finance a potentially expensive overhaul of the 911 emergency system to an Internet Protocol-based network.

During a hearing on Tuesday, U.S. senators said it's still unclear how this transition will work in practice. But they indicated it may be necessary to levy new charges on all telephone bills--including landlines, mobile and Internet phones--to help public safety officials cover the costs.

"I don't think we can go into a markup to pass a bill that has no future unless you have money," Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) said at a Senate Commerce hearing here about the future of 911 systems. Inouye was referring to a bill that would encourage the switchover but allocates no tax dollars to pay for it.

Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) called for suggestions on how to ensure the cost of the upgrades is spread out as broadly as possible, which could sweep in categories of phones such as voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP. (Vonage, for instance collects 911 fees in 23 states and says it does so voluntarily because no law requires it.)

"Somehow or another we've got to find a way to have people pay for this service, or it's not going to be sustained for very long," Stevens said, adding: "I do think we have to figure out how to spread it out as broadly as possible so (the cost per person is) as small as possible."

An amendment proposed by Stevens to a larger Senate homeland security bill this year would also set aside $43.5 million in federal grants for upgrading emergency networks, but that bill has not yet received final approval.

After Hurricane Katrina demonstrated the importance of resilient emergency communications systems, public safety officials have cited a host of benefits to overhauling the nation's 911 systems so that they are IP-enabled.

Such a shift could help to harden emergency networks during natural disasters or other crises that result in physical damage to 911 call-receiving centers, by allowing emergency coordinators to reroute call data packets to other regions of the country. Current 911 networks can generally receive only voice calls, but an IP-based system could also allow emergency dispatchers to receive distress calls by text message or even through uploaded videos or camera phone images.

Wanda McCarley, president of the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials International, said even the current method for funding 911 technology is inadequate, in part because not all wireless and Internet phone services collect 911 surcharges from their subscribers. Meanwhile, the number of landlines, whose carriers are legally obligated to collect 911 surcharges, is dwindling, leaving funding of 911 services in a tough spot, she said. She applauded the bill under consideration, which would give states and localities the power to collect 911-related fees from Internet phone providers.

Vonage Vice President Sharon O'Leary cautioned the senators against rushing to require that new fees be imposed. About 95 percent of the Internet phone provider's some 2.2 million customers can now dial into the enhanced 911 network, allowing dispatchers to discern the caller's location, a step above older systems.

"I would look very closely at fees that are currently being collected and how they are being spent," she said, adding: "In many instances, with new technologies, costs go down."

That's not necessarily the case in this situation, said Stephen Meer, chief technology officer for Intrado, which makes 911 networking equipment. Meer, who expects components of his company's IP-enabled 911 networking equipment to be deployed by year's end, said, "The net is, there will be more costs paid by the American public to have more features as the system grows more complex."

See more CNET content tagged:
Internet phone, Internet phone company, networking equipment, senator, phone provider

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
911 Would Have Fixed The Katrina Problem? Ha, Ha!
I thought Nawlins was wiped out because:

a) The Army Corps of Engineers did faulty levee work
b) Lowsianna politicians are corrupt and incompetant and mispent the money that should have been spent on flood control

So Ted "Bridge To Knowhere" Stevens is saying that problems A and B don't matter, what matters is that after a governmnet screw up by one agency another agency can go in and clean up the mess. Typical government thinking. Oh, and isn't it convenient that no sooner is the Spainish American War Tax dropped from phone bills then yet another phone tax proposed.
Posted by Stating (869 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Umm... diffrent view but...
I think you are reffering to this
<i>"After Hurricane Katrina demonstrated the importance of resilient emergency communications systems, public safety officials have cited a host of benefits to overhauling the nation's 911 systems so that they are IP-enabled. "</i>

Its not saying that e911 would have solved it, but because of the mass of confusion because of lack of communication, it shows that 911 isn't up to millennium standards.

When I say lack of communication... I mean how it took days for needed supplies to end up in Louisiana... the trucks and trucks of ice and water that were re-reouted to stoage centers in the midwest that never made it to new orleans where it was needed. The tons and tons of food wasted.... the inability to remove all the inhabitants when school buses where supposed to be getting them out of the effected areas. All communication.

Now honestly though... any politician can add in the idea of a disaster to get anything done.
"Rasing taxes could have prevented 9/11"
"*stamp* APPROVED"
Posted by timber2005 (720 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.