April 11, 2005 12:37 PM PDT

Senators don't want 1898 tax to hit Net

A tax originally created to pay for the Spanish-American War may not be extended to Internet connections after all.

Sen. George Allen on Monday announced a bill to prevent the IRS and the Treasury Department from levying a 3 percent federal excise tax to e-mail, broadband links or voice over Internet Protocol services.

"We didn't win the Spanish-American War to have our own government 'federales' burdening Americans with taxes on innovation over 100 years later," said Allen, a Republican from Virginia. Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, also is backing the legislation.

In a surprise move last July, the IRS and Treasury Department said they might reinterpret the Spanish-American War tax on phone calls "to reflect changes in technology" used for voice communications. Then, in January, a congressional committee suggested extending the Spanish-American War tax to all data connections including Internet, satellite and cellular services.

Those two actions have alarmed technology companies, VoIP providers and conservative members of Congress opposed to tax increases. In an interview with CNET News.com published in March, Rep. Chris Cox, a California Republican, said that the Spanish-American War tax "ought to have been repealed over half a century ago" and it should not apply to the Internet.

CompTIA, a technology trade association, applauded Allen's legislation, which is called the Federal Internet Tax Prohibition Act. The "proposal will further promote pro-consumer, pro-competitive, productivity-enhancing Internet services for all Americans," CompTIA said Monday.

Congress enacted the so-called "luxury" excise tax at 1 cent a phone call back in 1898, when only a few thousand phone lines existed in the country. It was repealed in 1902, but was reimposed at 1 cent a call in 1914 to pay for World War I and eventually became permanent at a rate of 3 percent in 1990.

In May 2000, the House of Representatives voted 420 to 2 for the repeal, but the Democrat-controlled Senate never acted on the measure.

Allen's bill would amend the IRS code to say that any "Internet access service" would be immune from the Spanish-American War tax. That term is defined as applying to any service that lets users "access content, information, electronic mail, or other services offered over the Internet."

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Deregulation
How does the internet taxation decision effect deregulation. Thanks to SBC, our Republican state of Indiana is entertaining the idea of reversing the deregulation law. How can you regulate technology like Wi-fi?
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Ah Yes...
nothing like getting tax for a war your parent's parents weren't alive for. God bless the IRS for trying to suck more out of us.

I tell you what. I want a detailed listing of every penny my taxes go for. I expect to have it by April 15th of every year.

Seriously, I have no problem paying taxes, but the government needs to stop being so wasteful. The only way that will ever happen is if they are held accountable for it. (not like thats going to happen).
Posted by System Tyrant (1453 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.