June 29, 2005 9:00 PM PDT
Senators propose sweeping data-security bill
- Related Stories
ChoicePoint overhaul completed, company saysJune 29, 2005
LexisNexis flap draws outcry from CongressApril 12, 2005
Congress edges toward new privacy rulesMarch 10, 2005
Senator predicts 'overdue' changes to privacyMarch 10, 2005
'Perfect storm' for new privacy laws?March 1, 2005
The bill represents the most aggressive--and at 91 pages, the most regulation-oriented--legislative proposal crafted so far in response to a slew of high-profile security breaches in the last few months.
"Reforms like these are long overdue," Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, said in a floor speech. "This issue and our legislation deserve to become a key part of this year?s domestic agenda so that we can achieve some positive changes in areas that affect the everyday lives of Americans."
One portion of the bill, named the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, restricts the sale or publication of Social Security numbers. Also, businesses would be prohibited from requiring SSNs except in a narrow set of circumstances such as obtaining credit reports and applying for a job or an apartment.
Leahy, who had hinted at his plans in a speech in March and had his personal information lost by Bank of America, is co-sponsoring the bill with Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter. Because Specter is the Republican chairman of the influential Judiciary Committee, the measure could move swiftly through the normally torpid legislative process.
"This is an evolving problem that is gigantic," Specter said at a press conference in the Capitol building. He predicted quick action because "we're not dealing with a highly controversial subject where there will be significant differences of opinion."
While portions of the proposal are sure to be criticized by businesses that would be faced with more paperwork and compliance requirements, Congress nevertheless seems eager to act. In speech after speech, politicians have pledged to enact more laws to respond to the data mishaps--promises that have occasionally raised eyebrows because many of the intrusions were already illegal.
Spurring politicians along has been series of security snafus involving firms including ChoicePoint--which claims to have fixed its problems--Bank of America, payroll provider PayMaxx, and Reed Elsevier Group's LexisNexis service. Other suggestions have included narrower measures to restrict the sale of SSNs or mandate notices of security breaches.
The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act would:
Erect a complex regulatory infrastructure around "data brokers," defined as any company or nonprofit that is "collecting, transmitting, or otherwise providing personally identifiable information" of 5,000 or more people that are not customers or employees. Data brokers are required to follow European-style guidelines, including mandatory disclosure of a record to that individual.
Rewrite computer crime laws to create new penalties for database intrusions. The punishments: Fines and 10 years in prison for trespassing in a "data broker's" system, and five years in prison if a company or individual "willfully" conceals certain types of serious security breaches.
Mandate a "comprehensive personal data privacy and security program" for most businesses and individuals acting as sole proprietors--akin to what the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act required.
Order companies and individuals acting as sole proprietors to offer notifications if a computer security breach "impacts more than 10,000 individuals."
Require review of federal sentencing guidelines for misuses of personally identifiable information, and authorize the Justice Department to hand grants to states to "enhance enforcement" of ID fraud-related crimes.
Create additional "privacy impact assessments" when a federal agency relies on a commercial database consisting "primarily" of information on U.S. citizens. If the database were worldwide in scope and did not consist "primarily" of U.S. citizen information, the requirement would not apply. Also, individual screening programs by federal agencies would have to be explicitly authorized by Congress.
The web of rules surrounding the "data broker" definition could prove problematic, warns Jim Harper, director of information policy at the free-market Cato Institute and a member of the Department of Homeland Security's data privacy advisory committee.
"This is a disaster," Harper said, referring to the portion of the bill that permits individuals to access their records held by data brokers. "The idea is to increase security. But opening databases to access is not increasing security. The issue is supposed to be security, and they're going to make databases less secure."
Harper also warned that the definition of "data broker" might cover news or gossip Web sites that publish personal information in articles, alumni organizations, charities and more. They would be subject to database access requirements. "I can't imagine all the different entities that would fall into that realm," he said.
CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report.
2 commentsJoin the conversation! Add your comment