January 29, 2009 9:26 PM PST
Senate approves digital-TV delay, again
- Related Blogs
-
House rejects DTV delay, keeps Feb. switchover
January 28, 2009 -
Senate OKs delay of digital-TV transition
January 26, 2009 -
Obama urges Congress to postpone DTV transition
January 8, 2009
The bill is essentially the same that passed the Senate earlier this week, but with a few minor modifications from the House.
(From Reuters)
The story "Senate approves digital-TV delay, again" published January 29, 2009 at 9:26 PM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.
18 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
So between now and June 12th are we expecting that the ederly will die, the poor will somehow get richer, and somebody will start chopping down some trees so they're not so rural.
I don't get it!
THe poor will be able to afford.
I say if you're concerned about those 6.5M people, extend the rebate coupons for another six months or year, and shut their TVs off. That's probably the only thing that will get them to buy the box.
What I'm talking about is there was a complete lack of coordination between the program administrator, manufacturers and probably retailers (how many boxes are being liquidated at Circuit City? DOH). You would assume the amount of money made available for the program was probably an educated guess at how many coupons would be needed to support the public. Well, what happened? This is the part the media isn't covering. Did they miscount the number of people needing this coupons? Is the coupon per person/household above their projected ratio? Like 2.1 vs 1.3, etc. What about those early coupons that were issued but not redeemed? What happened to those funds?
I agree with the general sentiment here. Simply delaying the switch doesn't accomplish much. If there is a measure to secure additional money for the program then at least I could see they are trying to do additional things to help get people ready. Also, what about lessons learned from that first town that made the switch? Are there factors from that test that are also fueling the desire to delay? What are they? Maybe I just need to read other stories about this than just Cnet. You'd think there would be more detail covered on this. Tisk, tisk.
This is a ridiculous idea, and people aren't going to be more responsible just because you've given them more time.
FAIL!!!
Remember when all radio was Amplitude Modulated? AM is also joked about as Ancient Modulation.
Remember when FM radio was on 42 to 50 megacycles per second (before Hertz whas honored)?
Remember when radio and TV all used vacuum tubes? Do you even know what a vacuum tube is?
Remember when TV was only black and white?
How about analog cell phones, stinkey car exhaust, FORTRAN instead of C++, and operator assisted long distance phone calls?
Sure, the airways are free, but you still needed to do more than just put your ear up to the wind to here anything. AM radios cost money. FM radios cost money. New FM radios cost money. TVs cost money. Color TVs cost money. Some people are still using their analog vacuum-tube round CRT color TV because their grandparents gave it to them. When is the last time you expected to travel across the country in a stage coach?
You can still do almost everything the old was, but it is just less rewarding, costs more, is less reliable, and more difficult to do. The "good old days" were not that good. Name five things invented in the last thirty years that you are now using and that you are willing to give up. Medical advances, hybrid cars, personal computer, fresh watermelon in February, or any of 100 other things?
Some people just like the past, it was comfortable and they forget the inconvient parts. A bumper sticker said it best, "The older I get, the better I was."
Quit whining about losing your old TV. Next year you will wonder why it took so long to get it done.