September 27, 2006 4:25 PM PDT

Second HP employee issued probe warning

A second Hewlett-Packard employee warned others at the company that the tactics being used in its leak probe might be illegal, CNET News.com has learned.

In a Feb. 7 e-mail, HP security official Vincent Nye told the company's head of security and a lawyer supervising a probe into unauthorized leaks that he had "serious reservations" about what the company was doing.

special coverage
HP's boardroom drama
Catch up on the complete coverage, including the latest news on HP's controversial effort to root out media leaks.

Nye said that his understanding of the methods HP was using to obtain telephone records using false pretenses "leaves me with the opinion that it is very unethical at the least and probably illegal," he said in the e-mail, which was turned over to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and seen by CNET News.com.

"If it is not illegal, then it is leaving HP in a position of (sic) that could damage our reputation or worse," Nye said in the e-mail. "I am requesting that we cease this phone number gathering method immediately and discount any of its information."

The e-mail appears to have been sent to former HP security head Anthony Gentilucci and Kevin Hunsaker, a former HP senior counsel. Both employees left HP as of Tuesday, the company said.

HP declined to comment Wednesday on Nye's e-mail warning.

The disclosure of Nye's warning comes on the eve of a congressional committee hearing into HP's internal investigation of the leaks. The House Energy and Commerce Committee has called on a number of HP executives to appear, including Hunsaker, HP CEO Mark Hurd and former Chairman Patricia Dunn.

Federal and state authorities have also launched criminal probes into HP's use of pretexting, or obtaining telephone records through false pretenses. HP has said its investigators targeted more than a dozen people, including current and former board members, nine journalists, two employees and an unspecified number of others.

Nye is at least the second HP employee to raise a red flag about the technique.

On Jan. 28, Fred Adler, a member of HP's IT security team, was asked if investigators might be able to obtain text messages for former board member Tom Perkins. Adler responded the same day that the company could not legally obtain the records "unless we either pay the bill or get consent." Adler's e-mail was reported last week by The Wall Street Journal.

Meanwhile, also on Wednesday, the House committee released the written testimony of Dunn and Hurd. In her testimony, Dunn said others at the company were involved in directing the leak probe and said that she believed the company was obtaining phone records "in a legal and appropriate manner."

In his written testimony, Hurd apologized, saying that the leak probe evolved into a "rogue investigation."

HP and Dunn have both said that the investigation took part in two phases, with the first stretching from early 2005 through that summer. Dunn has said the second phase resumed in late January 2006 after a Jan. 23 CNET News.com story that included details from a board meeting earlier that month near Palm Springs, Calif.

However, HP disclosed at a press conference on Friday that the company's outside investigators used physical surveillance at a January board meeting. According to sources, the only board meeting that month was the event in Palm Springs. HP declined to comment on why that meeting was watched if its leak investigation was not active.

CNET News.com's Anne Broache and Greg Sandoval contributed to this report.

See more CNET content tagged:
Patricia Dunn, Palm Springs, Mark Hurd, probe, testimony

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Poor Vince...
I'm sure he'll find a job somewhere.
Posted by fred dunn (793 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Funny... But
In case you haven't been keeping up on the story, Vincent Nye isn't the one loosing his job. The 'bad guys' are loosing thier jobs. That includes the original leakers as well as those involved in the snooping.

He didn't do anything wrong, and he didn't bypass the chain of command or 'blow the whistle' outside of the company. He'll probably get a promotion!
Posted by DougDbug (62 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.