Newsmaker: Season's over, so Cuban cheers for HD

(continued from previous page)

Everyone thinks content delivery will come from the Internet. It won't. It's too expensive and far too slow to deliver HD content. You just bought your 50-plus-inch LCD that is hanging on the wall. Do you want standard definition over compressed HD or the best-possible picture quality from your content?

Blu-ray Disc- or HD DVD-quality content or better will be possible, but you won't get that quality from a download. The reality is that it's cheaper and faster to send (hard drives with terabytes of) content overnight via UPS than it is to download it over the Net. Brown is faster than the Net.

So the smart company will send you hard drives full of content that you will pick and choose from. If it were up to me, DirecTV and the Dish Network would merge. They would buy Netflix and Hollywood Video, and then offer us 10-teraybyte hard drives full of all the content we could dream of that we can get for free or buy at a premium.

If it were up to me, DirecTV and the Dish Network would merge. They would buy Netflix and Hollywood Video, and then offer us 10-teraybyte hard drives full of all the content we could dream of that we can get for free or buy at a premium.

The hard drives would either show up at our door ala Netflix, be picked up at the store, ala Hollywood Video, or be pumped to a hard drive connected to our satellite connection (or cable connection) continuously. We then take those drives, plug them into the LCD TV and go movie-crazy.

Then when we get cabin fever or bed sores, we get out of the house and go to a Landmark theater (Cuban's company recently acquired Landmark Theatres) to see it on a big digital screen with the latest sound and effects.

You've talked about the possibility of making HD-quality movies available via kiosks equipped with hard drives or shipping people hard drives filled with movies. What option is best right now, and why do you hate DVDs so much?
Cuban: See above. I don't hate DVDs. I just like the flexibility, portability and choice of hard drives. You tell me which is easier to take on a plane: a 4-gigabyte flash drive with four movies in DVD quality, or four DVDs in their cases?

Now extend that to 100 movies on a portable hard drive. Which is exactly how I carry and review early cuts of movies for HDNet Films and 2929 Entertainment (Cuban's entertainment company).

You don't believe video-on-demand is a feasible model, but my friends say they don't want to go to a Blockbuster or wait for Netflix to send them a DVD by mail. They want to download movies off the Web. How long before we see this?
Cuban: You won't--at least not in the "I ask, I get" model. You may be able to download for overnight delivery via the Net. You may be able to download for 60-minute delivery if you are willing to take lesser quality. But before we get to bandwidth, you have to deal with the pirate phobia issues of the movie and TV business.

They won't let you download without so many limitations, it will piss you off more than its worth. You won't know what you can or can't do with the content, whether you own or are borrowing it and for how long. And you won't know what devices you can or can't use it on. A perfect world, right?

That said, if you are OK with standard definition, you will be able to go online, find what you want and immediately stream it--which is the exact model that was Broadcast.com. "Want it now, watch it now" is fine. But it won't be in HD, and it won't be download.

To download or stream HD takes far too much bandwidth to do it for all content. If I thought 100MB switched, sustainable bandwidth to the home was a reality in my lifetime, I would be all for it. It's not with current or on-the-horizon technology and financial scenarios.

Bandwidth to and in the home are issues. How much WiMax, WiThis, UltraThat, XXMax bandwidth will be created in the home in the next five to 10 years? Will it be enough to supply four HDTVs in a home while recording favorite shows to four TiVos at the same time? All in streams of 8MB or more? Simultaneously? I don't think so.

How important has it been for HDNet to sign legendary newsman Dan Rather?
Cuban: Dan is amazing. This was a huge move for HDNet. It not only provides us branding and visibility, but it unleashes Dan to do the news reporting that he hasn't been able to do for years at CBS. I think people are going to be amazed at what he is able to accomplish, and that, in turn, will obviously help accelerate HDNet's growth even further.

It's been reported that you are in the market for a 103-inch HDTV. Have you gotten it? What do you think of the quality of HDTVs, and which kind of set will win: LCD or plasma?
Cuban: Leave it to the New York Post to exaggerate a situation. I saw the 103-inch Panasonic at the Consumer Electronics Show. I asked if they could contact me when they were available so I could get one. They said "yes," and they did. So I have one on order and can't wait to get it.

I think LCD will end up winning, for sure. They are making the furthest strides per generation, and the capacity is growing so quickly, the prices will drop, and the sizes will grow more quickly than plasma.

Two consortiums are battling it out to replace the DVD format, and both are asking consumers to buy packaged discs. Where should Hollywood, consumer electronics manufacturers and software makers concentrate their efforts?
Cuban: I don't want them to change at all. They should make fewer movies--more opportunity for me.  

More Newsmakers

[nmarmol1]

5.7 Billions with a B

5.7 Billions with a B

[phoenix888]

surprising

This blurb of Cuban's is purely to promote HDNet, not HD technology at large. He makes it sound like the only relevant sports are the ones that his network just happens to broadcast (hockey/soccer). The lack of interest in hockey and soccer is totally unrelated to the previously unavailability of a more rectangular viewing format, people just don't care about those sports period.

[disco-legend-zeke]

Brown may be faster than Net, but not cheaper.

We experimented with average consumer connections, and a full 24 P 1920 X 1080<br />HD movie can be downloaded in about a day.<br /><br />At 10 cents per GIGABYTE, (a very high-end estimate) the delivery cost would be about $2<br /><br />Less then second day US Mail. The advent of 802.11N and Microsoft AVALANCHE will reduce that cost and delivery time by at least one order of magnatude.<br /><br />The studios will embrace Microsoft's content control system. Because the owners can control (and monitor) each placback of their content, they will finally breathe a sigh of relief, and start tracking down guys that shoot off the screen, etc. <br /><br />HBO is already shipping dailies between Rome and Hollywood Post production Facilities using Secured Channels, but still get a little green about the gills about the I-word. The present content delivery system for 4K digital movies to the theatre is hard drives by UPS Just as cubian says. <br /><br />But once the theatrical run is over (a week or two these days) All HD content distribution systems will depend primarily on good encryption, and less on physical security to prevent leakage.<br /><br />I am personally biased toward WMV. It worked well in our tests, its a good business model, a studio can throw away Blue-Ray disks out of planes (plenty of ex AOL experts available) with free previews on them, and consumers will visit a website for a license to view it.<br /><br />[insert net neutrality rant here] the very ability for Internet Radio and TV services to exist will depent on net neutrality.

[ashgilpincom]

The TV for HD

I recently purchased the Westinghouse LVM-42w2. This oversized monitor is a beauty. I use it as my computer monitor at my office - it's great! The picture quality is outstanding. No jpep artifacts or inaccurate colors. Read my full review at <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.ashgilpin.com/archives/64" target="_newWindow">http://www.ashgilpin.com/archives/64</a>