September 22, 2006 9:08 AM PDT

Search engine for personal files to be bundled in PCs

Related Stories

A virtual vault for personal data

July 20, 2005
EverNote--which makes an application that lets consumers find photographs, notes and other files lost on their hard drives--has landed bundling deals with major PC makers, company executives said.

PCs bundled with the company's application will appear before the end of the year, said CEO Tom Garland, though the company wouldn't say which computer makers will include the program. Lexar is putting it on USB drives.

EverNote will also release a mobile version of its software before the end of the year. A new version of the desktop software will come out later this month.

The company's application lets consumers search a broad array of files on their desktop: PowerPoint slides, Excel pages, Word documents, handwritten notes and even photographs. An integrated optical character recognition tool translates road signs and other words in photos for the search engine.

A search on "mustard," for instance, turned up a photo containing a jar of Heinz mustard. A search on a person's first name turned up a photo with a conference badge, handwritten notes containing the name, and e-mails containing the name in type.

The trick is that EverNote doesn't search everything on a hard drive. Consumers have to tag the items they want to save and be searched later. Thus, even heavy users may only have a few hundred items in their EverNote database.

Microsoft, among others, has for years tinkered with desktop search. These search engines search entire hard drives, which makes the task significantly harder. EverNote defends its practice of only searching a small subset of hand-selected data by noting that individuals, in most circumstances, will not want to search the mass of stuff on their hard drive.

"You wouldn't want to search all of your spam," said Stepan Pachikov, president and chief product architect at the company.

Consumers can attach descriptive terms to a saved item to make it easier to find later. The application, however, will automatically classify the document by type (handwriting, e-mail, photo, a clip from the Web, etc.), date, location where it was created and other factors.

Time, it turns out, is the most important bit of identifying information, Pachikov said. People generally remember when they took a photograph or had a meeting. Thus, they often search by an approximate date.

"The second most important is location," he said. "If you met me and wanted to find a photograph, you wouldn't think, 'Was it France or Australia?'"

Third, people rely on the type of media, which means they will start a search by focusing only on handwritten notes if they remember the information was taken down by hand.

Another future version of the product will be for the Web. Consumers will clip what they want to save and post it to a Web site, sort of like a collage.

See more CNET content tagged:
search engine, photograph, note, search, hard drive


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Isn't this already here...
Am i missing something or does Google Desktop search already do this kind of stuff? Isn't Vista going have this? (after all Microsoft is desperatley trying to find reasons to get you to upgrade) ;)

- Bryan
<a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Posted by bfleming98 (31 comments )
Reply Link Flag
What for?
Why would I want this? Just take notes in Word or Notepad &#38; search via Google Desktop, which also indexes e-mail, docs, etc.
Posted by BigBopperII (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Kinda useless for home users...
...and numerous other places, come to think of it.

Everywhere else? *nix users can use the built-in (nowadays) utility known as [i]locate[/i] (which is a mini search engine in and of itself... it uses a database to save time and I/O while searching).

Windows and OSX users I guess may have a use for it, but really... isn't this just a utility for people too computer-illiterate to use what's already there?
Posted by Penguinisto (5042 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Desktop search has been around much longer. The earliest I can recall is Digital's AltaVista, which was almost exactly the same thing that Google does now (build an index by pre-searching files of a familiar format, search the index at runtime). The key difference is that Google's desktop search uses Google's proprietary search algorithms.

The key to the article is that this app supports tagging of items to be searched. This allows a user to 'search' items that were typically excluded by other engines since other engines require data be represented in a format supported by the engine. For instance, imagine that I want to locate a song I really like that I've dumped into my mp3 collection. I might tag it as 'mom's favorite song.' Later, when I search for stuff related to mom, this song pops up.

Of all the files on your disk, it turns out that your desktop search engine only supports indexing / searching a fraction. Evernote claims users don't care about searching through most of the stuff on disk anyway.

The problem with this app is that *users* are required to do their own tagging - something that will never happen. This is a problem with the new 'web 2.0' search engines that allow users to build a catalog of items to be searched - something that probably won't catch on either.
Posted by Hardrada (359 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.