By Stefanie Olsen
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: May 3, 2006 4:00 AM PST
A teenager at a Pennsylvania school gets caught handing out business cards with instructions on how to circumvent his school's Web filter.
But instead of throwing the school discipline book at him, administrators offer a choice: They'll give him a break if he lets the school's tech people know how he beat the system.
Overwhelming response by parents, teachers and children to "Kids outsmart Web filters," a recent installment of CNET News.com's Digital Kids series, showed that the sidestepping of filters on school PCs is definitely a hot issue on campus (though it's certainly not the only one).
One of the most remarkable responses to the article came from the parent of the Pennsylvania teen. The student's free "Anti-Skool Policy" cards offered two URLs to access Web sites banned by the school. And, unfortunately for the student, they also bore his name, which led to his getting caught.
"My kid did get punished...(but) a bit different from the norm," the student's parent wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com. "The school would not press the issue if he showed the computer people (from the school) how he did it and explained how it worked.
"This pressure of being responsible for showing the school how the proxies worked, enabling them to block the proxies, had much more bearing on him than tossing him out for a couple days!"
So how are other schools handling this problem?
One IT administrator from a medium-size school district in Colorado wrote that kids accessing MySpace.com was a big problem until he installed a filter from 8e6 Technologies. "We haven't had an outbreak in a month," he said. Others promoted a filter from Websense and "white lists," or filters that direct traffic based on approved sites, not just a revolving list of unwanted sites.
On the flip side, kids touted Web proxies like Hidemyass.com, which even teachers used to access information on the Web.
According to one student: "Another school in the district caught some of the students using a proxy blocker to look up porn, and now it's a districtwide policy that if you use a proxy blocker or something similar, you get an automatic one-day suspension."
Judging by readers comments, it also appears that kids all over the world are savvy to proxies and other tricks for sidestepping filters.
A 15-year-old techie in Australia said that by logging on to his PC at school, he could use "Remote Desktop" to access the school Admin account. "Because they were using Windows 2003 edition, I could log in 'behind' (the teacher's) screen and I could use her computer without her even realizing it!"
From plying proxies to panning profsFilters and proxies aren't the only issue when it comes to education in the Internet age.
College kids are flocking to a site that helps them figure out which professors are hot, and which are not. Academically speaking, that is.
Ratemyprofessors.com, the rating and reviews site that has ruffled some feathers in academia, has nearly doubled its audience in the last year, according to research firm Comscore and the 23-year-old owners of the site. The site drew 724,000 unique visitors in March, up from 385,000 visitors a year ago, according to Comscore.
Part of that growth can be attributed to interest from professors--at least 25 percent of the traffic originates from professors, said Will Desantis, president of the site. But professors have long stuck their nose up at the site: Some schools have threatened lawsuits or banning the site from their networks (there's that issue of proxies again). One professor even began posting a blog called "Ratemystudents" that trashed kids in his class.
"We've been getting less complaints," said Desantis, who bought the Maryland-based company with a partner last October for "seven figures." "Most (professors who are going on) are seeing what they can improve on."
Still, he said, "it's hard to break down the image. We're kind of seen as the bad guy because people look at it on the surface."
Professors aside, the site is attracting interest from advertisers, venture capitalists and "big Internet companies," Desantis said, following a recent investment in Facebook, a social networking site for college kids. Revenue is up significantly, Desantis said, thanks to sponsorship ad deals with companies like National Lampoon. "By midsummer, we'll have a partner, investment or be acquired," he said.
Scarier than MySpace?Perhaps one of the most disturbing trends when it comes to kids and the Web involves adolescents who cut themselves, or "self-mutilate."
Such children are increasingly turning to the Internet to vent and commiserate with others about their secret affliction, according to a new study from Cornell University psychologists.
There are roughly 500 discussion boards devoted to talk about self-mutilating behavior by kids driven to cut, burn or scratch themselves, up from 400 when Cornell began its study a year ago. The study, which was published Tuesday, found that of the 3,200 messages analyzed, nearly a third of the comments were supportive in nature. Another 20 percent of the comments were about triggers and motivation for self-hurting practices.
The researchers said the socializing threatens to "normalize" the behavior. About 15 percent of the comments were for sharing methods for cutting or burning oneself or on concealing the behavior.
Of the surveyed comments, most were written by girls age 14 to 20. "They can easily find each other 24/7, and adults are clueless that this is going on," said Jane Powers, a senior research associate at Cornell and co-author of the study.
The finding makes sense, given that the Internet is a social hub for teens. More than 80 percent of American kids age 12 to 17 use the Net, and more than half of those kids log on daily, according to a Pew Internet study. And because secrecy is a hallmark of self-mutilation, the Internet is attractive for its measure of anonymity. Researchers suspect that up to 14 percent of teens purposely injure themselves as an outlet for emotional problems.
Teen-moods.net, a Web site for depressed teens, is one such outlet for kids who "self-hurt." "I am a cutter and have been since 11 years old and im (sic) 16 now," reads one post on the Web site. "i told my counselor that i dont think i can ever stop....please any feedback or similar stories write me back."
Send insights or tips on this topic to stefanie.olsen@cnet.com.
Stefanie Olsen covers science and technology for CNET News.com. In this series, she examines the young generation's unique immersion in the Web, cell phones, IM and online communities.
Sit down with children when they're online, and make sure they visit only Web sites that are parent-approved. The American Library Association lists great sites for kids on its Web site.
Use child-friendly search engines or one with parental controls. KidsClick, for example, is a Web search site by librarians.
Establish a family e-mail account.
Talk to children about their online activities and online friends because to them, the Internet is an extension of the real world.
Establish rules for the Internet. Studies from Canada's Media Awareness group have shown that children respond positively to established rules.
Recently I added some complex regular expressions that block most proxy sites even if they are not blacklisted. It's a very tricky thing to block the sites you don't want them going to but still allowying access to what they need to get to. Using a whitelist only approach would never work for us. I don't know how other districts do it.
Another thing a lot of people don't realize is how easy it is to setup a proxy bypass off of their home internet connection. If they do it properly it's almost impossible to detect.
There is no easy solution to the problem. You just have to constantly adapt to what the students figure out.
--
Steve - http://tail-f.net/
To keep up with this issue, you need a full-time employee monitoring the network at all times. Libraries can't afford books, schools can't afford teachers, but society expects them both to be "proxy parents".
Good luck with that. I'll watch what my kids do, show them right from wrong, like my parents did for me and theirs for them. Too bad most parents don't see the need for that effort.
Its free, and nearly impossible for admins to block.
Is it morally right? Should I have it?
Yes and yes
I'm not doing anythign illegal with it, I have logs to prove it, I just hate being told what I can and can't see on the internet.
Have a nice life admins,
Nerds will always win.
There are also the stories about cell phone companies selling a tracking service so parents can monitor their kids movements and also set certain areas off-limits. It's not that parents shouldn't be able to tell their kids where they can go, that's very reasonable. What bothers me is that these kids are being trained that it's okay, even normal, for their every move to be tracked.
All in all any campaign being sold with the goal of protecting children scares me. Why? Because it's so easy to defend ridiculous policy. All they have to do is say that their opposition is against protecting children and the general public, being easily controlled sheep, will automatically swallow this like they swallow everything else their TV tells them.
But then again maybe I'm just paranoid. Believe me, I'd love to be proven wrong, but in this I don't see that happening.
punishment is ruthelss and is absolute. whenever someone is caught, i ban them from all school computers. i let them know that i read every email they send or receive in my lab.
if they wanna bypass security, they can do it on a another teacher's computers or in the 'other' school lab.
because of 2 kids, i recently blocked all webmail. the kids know that if youre sitting at a machine that comes up 'mail.google' or 'mail.yahoo', youre finished.
punishment is ruthelss and is absolute. whenever someone is caught, i ban them from all school computers. i let them know that i read every email they send or receive in my lab.
if they wanna bypass security, they can do it on a another teacher's computers or in the 'other' school lab.
because of 2 kids, i recently blocked all webmail. the kids know that if youre sitting at a machine that comes up 'mail.google' or 'mail.yahoo', youre finished.
I am a Senior in High School. At our school we have a "one to one" laptop program, every high school student is issued a laptop for them to take home.
On our laptops we have restrictions to where we can install programs (AIM, FireFox). But that doesnt mean that we cant run them. Our district network has Websense for internet filtering (that doesnt stop me).
At my house I have setup a proxy server that also has VPN and Remote Desktop. The VPN support allows me to transfer files to and from my home servers. The Proxy server that I have setup allows me, and other students to get passed the school network. I currently have around 50 accounts setup , one for each user on the proxy.
I dont go around and spred my proxy around the school, but I do give it to people durig class that need it. Even though this is my last year here I still plan on keeping the proxy running for a couple more years.
At my house I currently have DSL, but within the month I will be getting FIOS, which should speed up the connection alot. I am running the proxy off of a HP Netserver that I picked up from a local business. So the only money out of pocket is paying for the internet connection.
Myspace is over anyways. The second somebody puts a patrolman to watch over a bunch of kids, its over. The only thing you can hope to do is to help your children make the right decisions. It's a scary world, but you have to let go sometimes.
Anyone that thinks a school doesn't have the right to limit what you do on THEIR computer on THEIR network, needs a wakeup call. The real world and a real company could be just that.
You put a companies data at risk, they won't take it lightly, trust me.
You kiddies be careful or you might see yourself in front of judge.
It's rediculous to think that most kids are by passing filters because they want to get to legitimate education websites. Even if a few are We all know, for most the reason is to check personal email, myspace, porn etc, etc. It's a joke. And our youth doesn't need yet another distraction.
Good luck admins. I know it's gotta suck to have to deal with snot nose brats all day.
63.208.226.42 Go myspace!
- Not just content filtering
- by bladesmith May 5, 2006 10:03 AM PDT
- While content filtering and bandwidth management are parts of the school filtering equation, don't forget about virused websites, websites with spyware, virused emails, drive by spyware infections, phishing attacks, etc...
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (85 Comments)One of the last things a school admin wants to worry about is cleaning up dozens or hundreds of workstations each day because users (students or staff) visited infected websites, either inadvertantly or deliberately.
Most students couldn't care less about protecting their school computer from infection and care even less about preserving network resources for their fellow students.
Website filtering helps preserve internet access by filtering out bandwidth hogging activity.
It preserves computing resources by preventing the infection of school workstations.
Some school filtering solutions have override features. Our school district allows this for school purposes.
If a student needs to access sites that are blocked (for whatever reason), they ask their teacher. If it's for a school project, it's allowed.
If they're caught abusing the privilege, they get a date with the school principal.
If the students are worried about their privacy, forget it. Privacy in a publicly funded school district isn't a right or entitlement. They may as well get used to it.