October 13, 2005 12:17 PM PDT

Samsung to pay $300 million for price fixing

The international conspiracy to fix memory prices uncovered in 2002 was real after all.

Samsung, the world's biggest memory maker, has agreed to pay $300 million and plead guilty for conspiring with others to fix prices on dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, the most common form of memory found in computers.

Hynix, another South Korean memory manufacturer, earlier pleaded guilty and paid a $185 million fine. Germany's Infineon Technologies also admitted to DRAM price fixing and paid a fine, although other defendants remain.

Samsung's fine is the second-largest criminal antitrust fine in U.S. history and the largest criminal fine since 1999.

"Price fixing threatens our free market system, stifles innovation, and robs American consumers of the benefit of competitive prices," said Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales. "Today's guilty plea is evidence of the department's ongoing commitment to protect consumers from corporations that engage in illegal conduct."

The one-count felony charge filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco stated that Samsung and its chip subsidiary, Samsung Semiconductor, conspired with others to fix prices for DRAM for servers and PCs from April 1, 1999 to June 15, 2002.

The Department of Justice made its investigation public in 2002 following a spurt of price increases in the memory market. Before the investigation became public, Michael Dell, then-CEO of Dell Computer, complained that memory makers were engaged in "cartel-like behavior."

Ironically, the manufacturers didn't reap huge profits from the conspiracy. Although Samsung has generally turned a profit off DRAM, many companies, including Hynix, have collectively lost billions trying to sell the products during various periods over the last seven years.

In addition, a glut of manufacturers and manufacturing capacity has often forced memory makers to sell their products below production costs and close factories.

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
$300 mil?
$300 mil. to be paid, while they still made profits from the price fixing? Sounds like Samsung won this battle...
Posted by (75 comments )
Reply Link Flag
so thats why ram cost so much?
screw them i hope they light them for all the cash they can, they should use that money to lower the price of ram
Posted by digitallysick (103 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.