SLRs lead digital camera sales surge

Digital camera shipments increased 15 percent from 2005 to 2006, but the high-end SLR category grew at a much faster 39 percent clip, according to new statistics from IDC.

SLR (single-lens reflex) cameras offer snappy response, higher image quality and a range of lenses, but they also cost more and are much bulkier than compact models. They offer better profit margins than compact models, but consumer electronics companies are injecting new competition into the market.

Sony wasn't in the market in 2005, but its 326,000 SLR shipments in 2006 were enough to vault the consumer electronics company over established camera makers Olympus and Pentax into third place overall, according to IDC data released Monday. Samsung and Panasonic also debuted to the tune of 43,000 and 36,000 SLRs, respectively, giving the newcomers 405,000, or 8 percent, of the 5.3 million total SLRs shipped.

However, Canon remains king of the SLR heap by a wide margin. Its 31 percent growth--a 578,000 camera increase to 2.46 million in 2006--added more new cameras than all three newcomers combined.

No. 2 Nikon cut into Canon's SLR lead, with 36 percent growth to 1.74 million shipments in 2006.

The overall SLR market grew 39 percent from 3.8 million shipments to 5.27 million in 2006, IDC said.

The overall camera market grew 15 percent from 92.3 million shipments in 2005 to 105.7 million in 2006, IDC said. The compact market grew 14 percent from 88.5 million to 100.4 million.

For compact cameras, Canon remained No. 1 with 22 percent growth to 17.3 million units shipped in 2006.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Digital cameras

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Sales/revenue

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
SLR, shipment, Canon Inc., digital camera, electronics company

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 15 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Leica
by aforslund April 3, 2007 11:49 PM PDT
SLR???

What about Leica and the M8?? It may not be the best seller but it
is by fat the camera that the true pro is going to look at. Not all
the best cameras carry the Canon or Nikon name. This is coming
from a professional Nikon shooter that lusts after Leica.

Good Luck
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
I just bought one myself!
by jazyfko April 4, 2007 7:52 AM PDT
Canon rocks, I just bought Canon Rebel xTI a month ago and love it! Now, its time for some fancy lenses to go with it!

Thanks for the great article. I also enjoy your news alerts...

Best, - Marek
Reply to this comment
Sony *bought* it's market share!
by dnheller April 4, 2007 8:30 AM PDT
This article makes Sony out to be some major gengius challenger in the DSLR market, but Sony didn't have a DSLR to offer until it bought the DSLR business of the merged Konica/Minolta camera companies.

Combined, Konica/Minolta would have had on their own something approaching what Sony sold in DLSRs last year.

Sony normally designs its own products, some successful, some not (remember Betamax?). It couldn't design it's own in a reasonable period of time much less introduce an entirely new lens mount, so it bought an also-ran in the DSLR market.

I guess Sony advertises too much with Cnet for us to get insightful reporting.
Reply to this comment View reply
And the M8 is not an DSLR
by dnheller April 4, 2007 8:33 AM PDT
The point of the story is the dominance of DSLRs, not digital rangerfinders or point-and-shoot cameras.
Reply to this comment
Fixed LCD
by Hans131 April 4, 2007 8:50 AM PDT
It would be good to know why the manufacturers of SLR cameras have elected to have a fixed LCD monitor. This, so it seems to me, limits shooting positions severely. Thank you, Hans HM
Reply to this comment View reply
Sony Did *NOTHING* Other Than Buy Minolta
by fensterbme April 4, 2007 11:24 AM PDT
Your story talked about Sony not being on the market and in one year jumping into 3rd position, which could give the impression that Sony went from nowhere to having completely new line on the market, all by themselves.

The reality is that they bought Minolta (which was the #3 player in the marketplace) and so it makes sense that Sony would now be in third place, true the Alpha camera was a Sony product but it was largely leveraged from all the Minolta products/resources. I think it's great that Sony, Samsung, etc. are in the DigitalSLR marketplace, as it drives innovation at Canon/Nikon and results in lower prices for everyone.

So while nothing you say is untrue, it's not as complete a story as it should be...
Reply to this comment
Sony Did NOTHING Other Than Buy Minolta
by fensterbme April 4, 2007 11:24 AM PDT
Your story talked about Sony not being on the market and in one year jumping into 3rd position, which could give the impression that Sony went from nowhere to having completely new line on the market, all by themselves.

The reality is that they bought Minolta (which was the #3 player in the marketplace) and so it makes sense that Sony would now be in third place, true the Alpha camera was a Sony product but it was largely leveraged from all the Minolta products/resources. I think it's great that Sony, Samsung, etc. are in the DigitalSLR marketplace, as it drives innovation at Canon/Nikon and results in lower prices for everyone.

So while nothing you say is untrue, it's not as complete a story as it should be...
Reply to this comment
No, 1D's live preview is NOT what you think it is...
by mbenedict April 5, 2007 12:48 AM PDT
You can't use the 1D's mk3 "live preview" like on a point and shoot.

For one, the 1D's live preview only works in Manual Focus mode. Plus the meter mode is fixed. Thus you can't change the distance between the camera and the subject without refocusing, so basically it can only used in still/studio type settings with the camera fixed on a tripod and shooting a static object.

Also when shooting at night (or whenever you need a flash), there is considerable extra lag since TTL metering doesn't work with the mirror up. So when you press the shutter release, the mirror has to come down, the shutter closes, TTL happens, mirror goes back up, and only then the shutter releases.

When not using flash there is a small additional lag (the shutter has to close, then open again) but probably not significant.

What live preview is really intended for is still-life macro shooting on a tripod, when you have very narrow depth-of-field. The live preview lets you (manually) achieve critical focusing before taking the picture.

Even then, the 1D's LCD is probably too small for critical focusing... so live preview is probably best used while the camera is tethered to a computer (so the image can be viewed on the computer's larger monitor.)
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Latest tech news headlines

Most Popular Stories
Google's search secret: It gets rid of you
Developer creates copy-paste tech for iPhone
Palm Treo Pro: Not digging it
Intel says it has 'first silicon' for next mobile chip
American Airlines launches in-flight Wi-Fi
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.11%) 12.78 11,430.21
S&P 500 (0.25%) 3.18 1,277.72
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 1,816.15
CNET TECH (-0.11%) -1.71 1,629.09
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement
Click Here
On CBS.com: A bride is murdered at her wedding
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites