Red Hat, Symantec bundle security offerings

Red Hat and Symantec announced Thursday the bundling of two hosted server security offerings for small and medium-size businesses. The suites, Secure Server Host and Secure Server Host for Applications, are designed to provide pre-configured or custom configured, behavior-based intrusion protection and detection for hosted servers.

The companies are bundling Symantec Critical System Protection with Red Hat Enterprise Linux or Red Hat Application Stack. Red Hat and Symantec will begin distributing these suites to its channel partners beginning this month.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Hardware servers

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Security

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Linux

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Red Hat

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Red Hat Inc., Symantec Corp., small and medium business, security, server

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments (Page 1 of 1)
How's that going to work with GPLv3?
by DMAN3k June 7, 2007 10:27 AM PDT
No proprietary software would be allowed. How's that going to work?
Reply to this comment
Not true
by sparcdr June 7, 2007 1:24 PM PDT
That's not true. The current GPLv3 draft still has loopholes. Not to mention if you have ever read the GNU Manifesto or seen videos of Stallman's Open Source speeches, you'd noticed that he's not out to make everything free. He believes that through support people can make money, as long as they obey by one rule, giving the source back. You don't have to give the source code out if used internally. Red Hat is mainly focused around support, while Symmantec is focused on security software. There's nothing wrong with building commercial software on top of GNU. It's preferable to use LGPL though as some would argue ownership of IP due to header infection via GPLv2 software. If the GPLv3 disallows all commercial activity, which won't ever be ratified, as open source projects depend on some commercial support, then they can fork the latest GPLv2 projects not upgraded by the perpetual license. Forking would be the solution abeit a bad one which I strongly believe has gone out of control. That's one reason I personally don't found my business completely on open-source software, too many unsupported and undocumented forks to chose from.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Latest tech news headlines

Most Popular Stories
Google's search secret: It gets rid of you
Developer creates copy-paste tech for iPhone
Will Wright on the origins of 'Spore'
Palm Treo Pro: Not digging it
American Airlines launches in-flight Wi-Fi
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Red Hat (0.83%) 0.18 21.88
Dow Jones Industrials (0.11%) 12.78 11,430.21
S&P 500 (0.25%) 3.18 1,277.72
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 1,816.15
CNET TECH (-0.11%) -1.71 1,629.09
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement
On MovieTome: TRANSFORMERS 2 SPOILERS!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites