September 29, 2004 3:56 PM PDT

RFID gets a reality check

Related Stories

With RFID, corporate might makes right

September 28, 2004

Static over RFID

September 13, 2004

Don't regulate RFID--yet

August 30, 2004
BALTIMORE--Radio frequency identification may be a hot topic among tech types these days, but proponents of the technology gathered here this week are keeping their exuberance in check.

The electronic monitoring technology undoubtedly holds a lot of promise. Radio frequency identification (RFID) is expected to help retailers and their merchandise suppliers save big bucks by reducing theft, shaving inventory and labor costs, and keeping store shelves stocked. That's why major retailers, including Albertsons, Best Buy, Target and Wal-Mart Stores, are all signing on.

Although the future of RFID and the companies lining up to supply it looks bright, a number of unresolved issues are keeping discussions more sober than giddy at the nascent industry's annual convention, EPCglobal U.S. Conference 2004. Among the concerns are the technology's costs, its impact on consumer privacy, its reliability and a fear that the latest equipment could quickly become obsolete as new versions are introduced.

But the chief question is whether businesses are ready to spend big on new technology again, after reining in budgets in recent years and watching flaky dot-coms go under, according to Sarah Friar, vice president of Goldman Sachs.

"RFID has to live within the confines of that environment," Friar said during a panel discussion on Wednesday. "It's technology, and people have been burned by that, so I expect them to take it slow."

It probably doesn't help matters that a shortage of RFID equipment is driving up prices and that customers have been aggravated by spotty quality, according to Meta Group analyst Bruce Hudson.

"There is still a lot to prove with the technology," John Raudabaugh, vice president of systems implementation at Albertsons, said during another panel talk. "We want to give it time to settle down."

"It's technology, and people have been burned by that, so I expect them to take it slow."
-- Sarah Friar, vice president
of Goldman Sachs
RFID must prove itself

Privacy and what to do to protect is another big topic. RFID works by placing special microchips--RFID tags--on merchandise. The tags signal their location across a network of readers placed on shipping docks, in warehouses and stores, allowing retailers and manufacturers to monitor products as they travel from factory to store shelves.

Privacy activists worry that consumers could leave stores broadcasting all kinds of information about their belongings for anyone with the right tools to see. Another concern is that people's belongings would leave an electronic trail of their whereabouts and activities for government officials, lawyers or marketers to collect.

Several people have lost divorce cases after lawyers subpeonaed data from RFID systems used in EasyPass express toll systems and used it as evidence against them, noted panel moderator David Kirkpatrick, senior editor of Fortune magazine.

Yet several speakers at the conference, including an official from Department of Defense and a Michelin executive, dismissed the issue. "Taxpayers should be happy I'm managing supplies with RFID," Defense Department official Alan Estevez said. "I don't want to discount people's concerns, but I think they're overblown."

Technical questions about RFID also abound. What do companies need to do to handle the onslaught of data RFID systems are expected to generate? Another big question: How can companies incorporate RFID with other business systems that monitor inventory?

Goldman Sachs' Friar said many big names in computer technology have yet to figure it out, despite pitching new RFID products and services. IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems all unveiled new RFID efforts this week in conjunction with the conference.

Friar added that many of those manufacturers have rushed to get something into the RFID market.

"A lot of it's a rebranding of products they already have in place that they can put under the RFID umbrella," she said. "They're being caught a bit on their heels."


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Common sense will cut a path
First, to address the bureaucrat's point:

""Taxpayers should be happy I'm managing supplies with RFID," Defense Department official Alan Estevez said. "I don't want to discount people's concerns, but I think they're overblown."

Taxpayers will decide this, thank you. If we're concerned we're entitled to put limits on this, and your job is to salute, end of story. John Ashcroft thinks the Bill of Rights addresses overblown concerns...

As for the future of RFID, using it in a commonsense way from the beginning is the way to have a future for this technology. The public has no problem with RFID on warehouse-to-store packaging such as palettes and containers, so that area is good to go. As for RFID on the retail pieces, putting the devices on the removable tags and boxes should alleviate almost all public concerns. It's the wackos who want to RFID the items so they can track us for marketing that will get the whole concept in trouble, so don't go there and you won't generate controversy.
Posted by Razzl (1318 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I sure hope the black hats come up with something fast to battle the RFID movement. This is one TROJAN HORSE concept RFID plan. I note that this is not on the main stream news but only for the small precent of us know about the rfid movement. I say to all you who oppose this conquest of walmart the machine to inform every one you know although they will not believe this intrusive. Write your local paper and give them key terms and tell them how EPIC this story is. Do what you have to before this chip is under your skin persa or not persa, I know I will get me a tagzapper to burst the chip. Stop them, ZombieWire
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Question on RFID
Have read the potential benefits of RFID on the retail stores. But what I understand is that gangs of shoplifters are using something to block the radio frequency so that the sensor is unable to detect the goods and alarm. Fortunately, ro unfortunately, they are all targeting for high value products and brand names. What would RFID help in such situation? If RFID doesn't cater for such scenario, then what is the value of RFID to high street shops?

The other thing is security. You may track on the products for, maybe, JIT and inventory control. But the others may make use of it to reveal the location for storage and the business operation data. How we can avoid the leakage of the confidential information through RFID?
Posted by douglaslau (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.