RFID technology could dramatically improve the safety of outpatients by providing the National Health Service with the right information to intervene before an incident, according to health service specialists.
Speaking at the RFID Futures event in London on Monday, Chris Ranger, assistant general director of the National Patient Safety Agency, said that his agency was calling on the technology industry to provide the infrastructure to allow the elderly or infirm to stay at home, when otherwise they might have no option but to go into residential care.
"We are faced with heartbreaking decisions of sending people into residential care because they cannot be safe at home," he said. "We want to be in a mode where we are predicting. It's a bit like weather monitoring. By building up this pattern you can say this is a precursor of something bad happening."
Ranger said that by using RFID technology to tag outpatients and key devices in their homes, the NHS could enhance what he describes as "lifestyle monitoring." By seeing exactly how people interact with certain devices, health specialists could more easily determine if someone is coping on their own.
If people don't carry out relatively simple, everyday tasks--such as making tea--it can be a sign that they aren't as functional as they need to be to remain at home on their own. "If people don't make tea it's a sign they are not coping, but how do you monitor that? The key is the collection and collation of all this information. What we really want to do is build up a picture of how people really cope. Then we may be able to intervene before something happens," said Ranger.
The government is very interested in the potential of home monitoring to take some of the burden off an already strained health service. Around $141.6 million (80 million pounds) has been made available over the next two years to stimulate the development of infrastructure to allow more patients to be monitored and cared for at home.
There are already some home-based monitoring devices--such as fall detectors and flood detectors for bathrooms--but, Ranger says, the devices are bulky, inelegant and expensive to implement.
"All this stuff is radio-based at the moment, which is great. It used to be hardwired. But it's all still very chunky stuff. It's not very nice. So we really need a bit of a breakthrough to help us," he said.
So what they're proposing is telling older people that if the spykit they're installing doesn't report back with the right information, they're going to be carted off to residential care.
I understand the well meaning intentions, but it seems to me that these people should think about how they would like it if they were treated in a similar fashion.
It's all well and good saying we should do something like this to protect old people from themselves, but isn't that kind of conceated?
What about the privacy issues?
It's not the job of government to decide what's good for you.
I'm sure these people understand the risks associated with living on your own (and let's face it, accidents can happen to anyone, not just old people), and are quite capable of making their own decisions when it comes to assisted or residential care.
So rather than spending millions to spy on the elderly, why not spend the same money on an emergency response system - something they can carry on them at all times and simply press a button if they get seriously injured and are not in reach of a phone.
Private businesses sell systems like these, so we know it's possible - and it would do a great deal more to assist people living on their own than spying on them with RFID tags.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
Whether Apple will release a new iPad next month doesn't seem to be the question as much as what day it will happen. A new rumor has it down to the day.
Tommy Jordan, the man who shot his daughter's laptop for YouTube, gets a visit from police and child protection services. Oh, and Good Morning America.
Along with green-lighting Google's buy of Motorola, the Justice Department today OKs an Apple-Microsoft-RIM partnership deal to buy Nortel patents, and Apple's plan to acquire Novell patents.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
"Never Stop Playing" campaign for upcoming portable marks Sony's largest platform launch marketing spend, with ads to reach YouTube, Facebook, TV, and billboards in major cities.
As UC Berkeley students, the co-founders of "Back to the Roots" discovered they could grow mushrooms using recycled coffee grounds. Now their mushroom kit sells at grocery stores across the country.
I understand the well meaning intentions, but it seems to me that these people should think about how they would like it if they were treated in a similar fashion.
It's all well and good saying we should do something like this to protect old people from themselves, but isn't that kind of conceated?
What about the privacy issues?
It's not the job of government to decide what's good for you.
I'm sure these people understand the risks associated with living on your own (and let's face it, accidents can happen to anyone, not just old people), and are quite capable of making their own decisions when it comes to assisted or residential care.
So rather than spending millions to spy on the elderly, why not spend the same money on an emergency response system - something they can carry on them at all times and simply press a button if they get seriously injured and are not in reach of a phone.
Private businesses sell systems like these, so we know it's possible - and it would do a great deal more to assist people living on their own than spying on them with RFID tags.