Version: 2008

September 24, 2005 12:38 PM PDT

Problems surfacing with iPod Nano screen

  • 174 comments
Some owners of Apple Computer's new "impossibly small" iPod Nano are starting to wonder if the device is also impossibly delicate.

The most widespread complaint about the otherwise highly praised device seems to be that the color display screen gets scratched extremely easily.

Nano owner Brian Cason posted one of 250-some threads in response to a recent post on Apple's discussion board about screen scratching.

"I don't really care if the case on my Nano gets scratched but my screen has scratched up so badly that all the images are starting to become distorted," Cason wrote, echoing the sentiment of many others in the discussion. "I have only carried it in my small pocket in my shorts and nothing is in there to scratch it. I still can't figure how the screen looks like it has been rubbed with sandpaper when the entire time it has been safe in my pocket (with absolutely no items)."

But this week, several users also started complaining about screens cracking, or failing, inexplicably. Nano owner Matthew Peterson set up the site flawedmusicplayer.com (formerly ipodnanoflaw.com) to tell the story about how his Nano screen shattered after just four days, to see if others have had the same problem, and to suggest that Apple recall the Nano and use a stronger screen product.

"It is way too fragile. Apple markets it in a pocket. Hell, Steve Jobs himself pulls it out of his when he announces it," wrote Peterson, who himself was smitten with the Nano upon its release. "It was in my pocket as I was walking and I sat down. No, I didn't sit on it."

An Apple official was not immediately available for comment on the alleged problems with Nano screens.

Some Nano owners have written to flawedmusicplayer.com, challenging its premise and arguing that they haven't had any problems with their screens. They chalk problems up to user abuse and reference an Ars Technica report that shows the Nano holds up to extreme circumstances.

Several, however, e-mailed with similar screen failures and debated whether the problem is caused by a design flaw or poor manufacturing, possibly just in an isolated batch.

iPodnn pointed out that at least one iPod repair company, iPodResQ, has temporarily raised the price of Nano LCD repair "due to LCD availability and overwhelming demand."

Last June, Apple agreed to settle several class action suits over the battery life of earlier iPod models, offering extended service warranties and $50 store credits to consumers who lodged complaints.

See more CNET content tagged:
pocket, color display, Apple iPod Nano, Apple Computer, owner

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 5 pages (174 Comments)
Parasites
by cjohn17 September 24, 2005 1:42 PM PDT
I am constantly amazed at people who will abuse their technology
then expect it to work flawlessly without exception. "It's not my
fault!" No one ever wants to take responsibility anymore.

Also, don't be surprised if this turns out to be a lawyer driven
attempt to initiate a class action suit just to cash in. In fact, I'm
betting it is. Parasites.
Reply to this comment
Erm
by wazzledoozle September 24, 2005 2:22 PM PDT
I wouldnt call putting a portable music player in your pocket "abuse", I would call it usage.
View all 3 replies
Apple also sells accessories for iPod!
by September 24, 2005 11:42 PM PDT
My guess is some tightwad didn't want to pay a few extra dollars
for a protective case for the ipod!
View all 4 replies
Be fair...
by toosday September 25, 2005 8:22 AM PDT
Come on, be fair. Sure some people are probably abusing their
Nanos and expecting them to perform perfectly, but that may
not be the case for everyone.

It seems die-hard Mac users immediately takes sides with Apple,
expecting them to not be able to release an less-than-perfect
product. (As a Mac user and iPod owner, myself, I know that is
not true). And everyone made the same User Abuse claims with
the previous iPods - only to find out that, yes, the batteries were
indeed crap.
View reply
what?
by ozzieXP September 26, 2005 12:08 PM PDT
Listen person, I spent ~ $280 for the iPod nano and accessories, and you are telling me that I abused the technology??? My nano didn't have a scratch and in less than 6 hours it broke because it was on my side pocket (doing the same thing Steve from apple did) and I TOOK GOOD CARE OF IT!

Apple decided to fix it because they know I was right, and if they dont, thats why my father's a lawyer :)

anyway... i ask you to stop saying stuff like that because it is really not true, the nano has a flaw and its the lcd.
View all 2 replies
Lawyer driven parasites indeed
by janus2810 October 31, 2005 9:16 AM PST
Do you work for Apple by any chance??? I just received a Nano 4GB for my birthday two days ago, the first time I took it out of the house in my EMPTY pocket this morning, the screen cracked and the entire front of the unit is scratched up!! This is not abuse of electronics. Don't open your mouth until you know what you're talking about!
Apple overpriced crap per usual
by wazzledoozle September 24, 2005 2:21 PM PDT
Reminds me of the failing battery years ago.
Reply to this comment
Cynical PC Moonbats
by cjohn17 September 24, 2005 4:58 PM PDT
Yeah, 80% of the music player market means failure.
View all 3 replies
Cynical PC Moonbats
by cjohn17 September 24, 2005 4:59 PM PDT
Yeah, 80% of the music player market means the product is a
failure.

Enjoy your Creative Zen.
View reply
what does overpriced carp have to do with anything?
by Lolo Gecko September 26, 2005 3:59 PM PDT
:)
but you can drive a car over it....
by September 24, 2005 2:32 PM PDT
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars

These people must be eating too many crispy creams.
Reply to this comment
... and end up with ipod apple cider
by Lolo Gecko September 26, 2005 4:07 PM PDT
:)
Boy Apple Fanboys are dimwitted
by ballssalty September 24, 2005 3:02 PM PDT
If it scratches so easily, buy a PDA screen protector and cut it out to size to fit the Nano screen. Sheesh.
Reply to this comment
but....
by September 24, 2005 5:41 PM PDT
these are more likely the average windows user who purchased
iPods. Mac fanboys are picky.... but they aren't stupid..... and often
take care of their hardware......
View all 2 replies
Scratches... what scratches??
by September 24, 2005 8:40 PM PDT
I was about to blame the users, until I saw pictures of the damage.

We are not talking about "scratches". We are talking about internal damage to the displays. What they call scratches is actually a leakage of the liquid that generates the colors inside the display due to internal rupture.

This is definitely a manufacturing problem. LCDs are not supposed to leak (internally) that way.
Reply to this comment
Yup...
by Mendz September 24, 2005 9:26 PM PDT
Not scratches at all... Looks damaged from inside. iPod Nano's delicate? Abused? Do I hear a recall? Check your warranties...
Not Windows users?
by KTLA_knew September 24, 2005 8:57 PM PDT
Did you seriously just claim that this wasn't the fault of stupid Windows users, and nothing else???

Seriously???
Reply to this comment
Unexplicably isn't a word
by September 24, 2005 10:33 PM PDT
How can you claim to be a credible news outlet if you don't even
have an editor that knows the difference between "inexplicable" and
"unexplicable"? Maybe they don't know the difference between
"Dell" and "Apple," either.
Reply to this comment
finally
by September 25, 2005 8:17 AM PDT
They finally edited this story.... it only took them a few days after it
was originally published.
If this is the state of reporting in the digital age... i think we are in
trouble.
No difference between Apple and Dell
by Jess McLean September 25, 2005 11:08 PM PDT
Both provide very bad services to customers.
Heat damage is not "scratching"
by lesfilip September 25, 2005 12:52 AM PDT
These totally look like heat damage, not scratches. It is possible
that a defective screen would be more prone to this kind of issue
but it is out of the ordinary for a typical LCD. I would leave open
the possibility that there are defective screens out there, but I
would also bet a nickel that some folks simply did something
stupid and don't want to take responsibility for it. And by
"something stupid" I don't necessarily mean using Windows :)

Have a nice day.
Reply to this comment
Very possible
by Andrew J Glina September 25, 2005 7:30 AM PDT
The same thing happened to me in 1998 with a 2 month old top of the line Zaurus. I left it on a table in the shade and went out for a few hours. I underestimated how much the sun angle would change (I was in China at the time and I was not used to the weather, or so my excuse goes) and by the time I came back my pride and joy was dead. Lokked just like those screen do.

Sad story eh?
seems more like heat damage between your ears
by Lolo Gecko September 26, 2005 4:29 PM PDT
:)
Apple must've scrimped on testing the Nano...
by PCCRomeo September 25, 2005 7:21 AM PDT
Because if this problem is so wide spread there is no way the product could have been tested that well. I mean, this is a portable device, they need to test these things by going as far as to dropping them off of a 2nd floor and backing over them with a car. Oh well, I'm glad I won't have to pay $50 to get a Nano screen replaced!!! :-D :-D
Reply to this comment
First Gen Products
by sanenazok September 25, 2005 9:06 AM PDT
When will people learn that first gen products should be shunned? If you don't believe this, look at statistics of car durability - they always take a downturn whenever a company "retools" a pre-existing model or introduces a new one.

Just say no.
View reply
No problem's here.
by September 25, 2005 10:34 AM PDT
Mine hasn't scratched and I'm very happy with it.
I was also happy with the price.
Reply to this comment
CNET review of the Nano should be updated.
by seespottype September 25, 2005 8:45 PM PDT
In light of all the reports regarding the fragile nature of the Nano's LCD, CNET might want to retract their editor's choice award. While the review does mention the finish of the product is easily scratched, that's a far less prolem then the lcd being scratch and rendered unlegible. Ironically, the review recommends an action noted noted most often as the cause of broken lcd's: "It's more natural to slide the iPod Nano into a jeans pocket".

Or maybe the CNET reviews don't read CNET's tech sites.
Reply to this comment
Intelligence, anyone?????
by Earl Benser September 26, 2005 4:49 AM PDT
Has anyone actually defined the magnitude of the problem??? There
are far too many people blowing smoke, damn few, if any, who
really know what they are talking about.

I suggest all the wannabe motor mouths take a vacation and let
those who do know what's going on tell the actual tale. Then
maybe we will find out just how big a teapot is required for this
tempest.
Reply to this comment
News flash!!!!!
by Norseman September 26, 2005 5:00 AM PDT
The sun comes up in the east.
Water flows downhill.
Hot air rises.
A piece of plastic in a pocket with keys and change gets scratched.
Duh.
Reply to this comment
News Flash - Screen's trash!
by September 26, 2005 2:46 PM PDT
I have had my black iPod nano for 1 day and already the screen has
a scratch from someone's thumb brushing over it! I understand
what your saying, but mines been on my desk at work and has still
managed to get scratched from normal handling. I think apple
need to look at the quality of whatever finish is on the case...
insanity
by Bob Brinkman September 26, 2005 5:39 AM PDT
I've read some wacky threads here, but this one takes the cake.

One of my favorites is the one implying that it must have been Windows users living in their own filth that caused these people's screen problems with the Nano.

What I really want to know is this though, why is it that an 80% market share for mp3 players automaticly means that Apple's IPOD is the best thing since sliced bread, but a 90% share for MS automaticly means that 90% of home computer users are idiots? Can you guys make up your mind one way or the other? Either market dominance equals greatness or it doesn't.
Reply to this comment
insanity
by MMRL26 September 26, 2005 5:52 AM PDT
LMAO
View reply
Well said!!!!!
by September 26, 2005 1:44 PM PDT
NC
make up our minds? phooey, making up this BS is more fun
by Lolo Gecko September 26, 2005 3:49 PM PDT
:)
View all 2 replies
Hypocryte anyone?
by Maelstorm September 27, 2005 10:59 AM PDT
<<I've read some wacky threads here, but this one takes the cake.

One of my favorites is the one implying that it must have been Windows users living in their own filth that caused these people's screen problems with the Nano.

What I really want to know is this though, why is it that an 80% market share for mp3 players automaticly means that Apple's IPOD is the best thing since sliced bread, but a 90% share for MS automaticly means that 90% of home computer users are idiots? Can you guys make up your mind one way or the other? Either market dominance equals greatness or it doesn't.>>

I have a MP3 player, and it's not an iPod. With 1GB flash, it does everthing that I need it to do. I don't need a 40GB harddisk that can break if it gets dropped. As for the comment, all that I have to say is that the person who made it is suffering from HUA syndrome. I'll leave it to you do determine the meaning of the letters. From my experience, Mac users are some of the worst hypocrytes that you will ever meet.
Threads like this make me angry!
by BruceLawrence September 26, 2005 9:08 AM PDT
It never ceases to amaze me how little it takes to start a flame war between the infants of both Macs and PC's.

Half the people posting in this thread are acting like a bunch of kids at the lunch table screaming about what game is better.

One person actually suggested that Apple products are geared towards the upper class and those types of people take care of their products. What an ignorant thing to say. $200 is "upper class"? I'm doing pretty darn well then! Perhaps this person should go speak to the upper class gentlemen that has a G5 which overheats when playing a game. I'm sure he's taking care of his $2,000 investment.

Bottom line is the Nano is a great product. Once again Apple has released a product that appears to impress the industry with innovation. However, that doesn't make it flawless. Perhaps they did use cheap glass. SO WHAT! They will fix it if there is a problem. It's OK! Apple doesn't make everything perfect regardless of how well their products work for you. Or how much you want them to succeed you'll say any stupid comment on the internet without thinking about the people you are talking to.

We are all consumers of equal value. Why? Because a poor mans money is just as good as a rich mans but a poor man will probably take better care of it so watch your mouth the next time you spout off about the people around you.
Reply to this comment
mellow out dude, don't go Klingon on us
by Lolo Gecko September 26, 2005 4:35 PM PDT
:)
I disagree
by sanenazok September 26, 2005 9:13 AM PDT
First generation products can be a re-tooling of a pre-existing product that introduces the news flaws that couldn't be possible due to the makeup of the previous products. This happens with my area, cars, all the time. Company like Nissan will have a good car, like the 1995 Altima, retool it for 1996 and reliability dives. It's back up by 1997 or 98, but still. Here, Apple made a new screen or new protector for it, and it doesn't work in real world conditions. That's what happens to first gen products all the time. Established companies make first gen products all the time, otherwise they wouldn't stay established very long (unless they're the power company, I guess, but even they have to roll new things out all the time).

The fact that Apple's been making gadgets for 20+ years only goes to show that it should know better. There are few excuses for this type of flaw. It's not like they had to rush this to market in order to prevent some competitor from taking it over - Apple has this market cornered. Test it, and then test it again, rather than shoving things out the door so that Jobs can show them off.
Reply to this comment
wl
by sanenazok September 26, 2005 9:14 AM PDT
wrong link
Possible problem
by September 26, 2005 10:03 AM PDT
The Ars Technica report addresses drop testing and linear compresssion testing (the car and sitting directly on it). The iPod is apparently extremmely well built for that kind of stress. Those test don't address the "front pants pocket" environment though. Items in your front pocket are twisted and bent while sitting--not compressed. Glass is much more easier to break when twisted, and there isn't sufficient room in the case to give the glass a lot of play. There's even a post on flawedmusicplayer regarding this. It's not a "cheap LCD" problem, it's more of a "not enough internal bracing" problem--but it is Apple's problem.
Reply to this comment
The iPod Nano is too delicate - you have to protect it.
by September 26, 2005 12:19 PM PDT
If you have owned any small electronic device with an LCD sceen
within the last few years then you have learned two things: 1.
LCD screens develop scratches unless protected. and 2. The
smaller the device the more fragile it is. The iPod Nano is not an
exception to these two tenets. Apple's delima is twofold. 1. The
protective skins are not readily available. 2. They have not
cautioned users that the device is prone to scratches unless
protected.

Yes, they may have some material/design flaws since the black
one in particular, the one I own of course, is very prone to
scratches, and there doesn't seem to be any way to remove them
once they start. I bought a small leather business card wallet to
protect it in the short term but it still seems to be getting
scratches-bummer. Then again, there's a reason they call it "the
cutting edge of technology," sometimes there's some blood lost.
I hope that Apple responds quickly and reasonably to these
issues. Thanks for addressing the issue quickly.
Reply to this comment
Just like the PSP...
by September 26, 2005 1:49 PM PDT
When the PSP came out it had a lot of the same complaints about how easy it is to scratch or otherwise marr its pristine, shiny faceplate and screen. Then along came all the protective accessories. It's the same story with the iPod nano--especially the black one like I have: If you want to keep your beautiful tech gadgets shiny and new, you've got to protect them. (At leasy the PSP comes with a cleaning cloth and soft case)
Reply to this comment
Nano Screen Scratches
by September 26, 2005 2:26 PM PDT
As the article stated there may be a batch that is just bad. I just bought mine and barely touch the sides of it when I move it (which is all of about 5 times) because the screen is scratching each time I touch it somehow. I haven't taken it out of the house because I don't have a case and thought I wouldn't be able to even see the screen if it touched anything.

Definitely something wrong.....
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 5 pages (174 Comments)
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Apple (0.00%) 0.00 210.73
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 10,428.05
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,115.10
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 2,269.15
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,646.41
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right