October 16, 2005 9:25 AM PDT
Power companies enter broadband market
- Related Stories
-
Power line broadband gets popular with tech firms
August 24, 2005 -
Broadband's power-line push
July 11, 2005 -
Google invests in power-line broadband
July 7, 2005 -
Internet access over power lines nears reality
March 6, 2000
The idea of offering high-speed Internet service to consumers over their power lines has been around for years in Europe, but the United States is just now catching on.
The New York Times
The story "Power companies enter broadband market" published October 16, 2005 at 9:25 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.
6 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Compare this to Current Communications. They offer symmetric service. Their upload speed blows the socks off SBC's ADSL. In terms of price, it is $26.95 for 1 Mbps, and $34.95 for 3 Mbps, with a 2 year signup.
I sure would like to have a choice of BPL, DSL, and cable. Right now DSL is the only cost effective broadband choice I have. Also, I wonder if BPL might be an option for cities like San Francisco that want to offer free or low cost Internet access to citizens. And it would be a piece of cake to deploy broadband to school classrooms, churches, libraries, etc. at very little cost. Seems that it would be cheaper to roll out than WiFi and gives better speed.
Per Current's website:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.current.net/ServiceAndPricing/Residential/PricingAndBenefits/" target="_newWindow">http://www.current.net/ServiceAndPricing/Residential/PricingAndBenefits/</a>
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.current.net/LearnMore/Benefits/" target="_newWindow">http://www.current.net/LearnMore/Benefits/</a>
"You can even send and receive files faster than DSL. While cable and DSL services send e-mail and other files more slowly than they receive them, CURRENT BroadbandŽ sends and receives data at the same high speed. So you can send graphic files, pictures, video files and more, faster than ever before!"
Compare this to Current Communications. They offer symmetric service. Their upload speed blows the socks off SBC's ADSL. In terms of price, it is $26.95 for 1 Mbps, and $34.95 for 3 Mbps, with a 2 year signup.
I sure would like to have a choice of BPL, DSL, and cable. Right now DSL is the only cost effective broadband choice I have. Also, I wonder if BPL might be an option for cities like San Francisco that want to offer free or low cost Internet access to citizens. And it would be a piece of cake to deploy broadband to school classrooms, churches, libraries, etc. at very little cost. Seems that it would be cheaper to roll out than WiFi and gives better speed.
Per Current's website:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.current.net/ServiceAndPricing/Residential/PricingAndBenefits/" target="_newWindow">http://www.current.net/ServiceAndPricing/Residential/PricingAndBenefits/</a>
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.current.net/LearnMore/Benefits/" target="_newWindow">http://www.current.net/LearnMore/Benefits/</a>
"You can even send and receive files faster than DSL. While cable and DSL services send e-mail and other files more slowly than they receive them, CURRENT BroadbandŽ sends and receives data at the same high speed. So you can send graphic files, pictures, video files and more, faster than ever before!"