March 1, 2007 6:00 AM PST

Police blotter: Wife e-surveilled in divorce case

Related Stories

Police blotter: Convicted eBay robber loses appeal

February 21, 2007

Police blotter: Wireless voyeur appeals 56-year term

February 14, 2007

Police blotter: Texas student guilty in SSN hack

February 2, 2007

Police blotter: Heirs sue over will-making software

January 24, 2007

Police blotter: Antispam activist fights lawsuit

January 19, 2007

Police blotter: Detecting computer-generated porn?

January 3, 2007

Police blotter: Web at heart of ecoterror lawsuit

December 27, 2006

Police blotter: Google searches nab wireless hacker

December 20, 2006

Police blotter: Fired over 'Wicked Weasel' photo

December 8, 2006

Police blotter: Child porn in Web cache OK

November 24, 2006

Police blotter: Florida judges target Net sex

November 17, 2006

Police blotter: Prison inmate wants personal ad replies

November 10, 2006

Police blotter: Child porn blamed on computer virus

November 3, 2006

Police blotter: Web cookies become defendant's alibi

October 27, 2006

Police blotter: Flap over nude photos of Cameron Diaz

October 20, 2006

Police blotter: Prosecutors want reporters' hard drives

October 13, 2006

Police blotter: Sex offender demands Playboy on PC

October 6, 2006

Police blotter: When can cops seize your computer?

September 29, 2006

Police blotter: Alleged al-Qaida hacker goes to court

September 22, 2006

Police blotter: Cops raid Usenet provider over porn

September 8, 2006

Police blotter: Judge OKs text message use in drug case

September 1, 2006

Police blotter: Trojan horse leads to porn convictions

August 25, 2006
"Police blotter" is a weekly News.com report on the intersection of technology and the law.

What: Husband uses keystroke logger to spy on wife's suspected relationship with another woman, who sues to prevent the records from being used in the divorce case.

When: U.S. District Judge Thomas Rose in the southern district of Ohio rules on February 14.

Outcome: Rose denies request for injunction preventing the electronic documents from being introduced as evidence in the divorce case.

What happened, according to court documents:
Once upon a time, tempestuous divorces might have included one spouse snooping through the other's private correspondence or eavesdropping on private conversations taking place in another room.

That kind of snooping was, for the most part, entirely legal. But when the same kind of snooping happens in electronic form, it can be a federal crime. (Last year, Police Blotter covered the case of the Garfinkel divorce. Another case involving spyware arose a year earlier.)

That may or may not be the case here. Jeffery Havlicek filed for a divorce from his wife Amy Havlicek in Ohio's Greene County Common Pleas Court. Amy had been chatting through e-mail and instant messages with a woman named Christina Potter. Jeffery suspected that Potter and his wife, Amy, were romantically involved in a lesbian "relationship of some sort," his attorney would later say in a legal brief.

Around that time, Jeffery installed some sort of monitoring software on the family computer--a Dell Precision 220 that was located in the guest room, was used by multiple family members including teenage children, and did not have a password on it most of the time. (There is disagreement about why the software was installed; Jeffery says it was in part because of his daughter's increased use of the Internet.)

Jeffery has admitted this much. In a sworn affidavit (PDF), he said that he installed an unnamed monitoring utility in September 2005, three months before his wife moved out of their home. The affidavit said the utility "collects keyboard typing, screen shots, and requested access to Web sites...The keyboard typing utility logs the time and sequence of keystrokes...The screen shot logging feature is similar to hitting the 'print screen' button on most keyboards. It saves an image of what appears on the monitor."

He also admitted to downloading e-mail from his wife Amy's Web-based e-mail account, but claimed it was authorized because she had chosen to save her username and password through the browser's "remember me" feature.

In total, Jeffery has acknowledged compiling 80 keyboard and Web site log files in HTML format, more than 2,000 individual screen snapshots in JPEG format, six video tapes, six audio tapes, and numerous other files including "24 electronic documents from diaries, love letters, etc."

He planned to use that vast array of electronic evidence as ammunition to win his divorce case. Eventually his lawyer showed some of the correspondence between Amy Havlicek and Christina Potter to Amy's own attorney. In an affidavit (PDF), Potter claims that the correspondence was also shown to neighbors and a court-appointed custody evaluator "to harass, annoy, and inflict emotional injury on me."

Potter, his wife's alleged paramour, responded by filing a federal lawsuit designed to shut Jeffery up. She asked for an injunction barring any "disclosure" or "dissemination" of the electronic documents, including preventing them from being used in the divorce case taking place in state court.

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, a federal law, was violated during the recording, Potter claimed. ECPA (18 USC Section 2511) bans anyone from disclosing "to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication" that was obtained illegally.

Potter lost. U.S. District Judge Thomas Rose said that ECPA does not permit courts to disallow such evidence, saying that appeals courts "have concluded that Congress intentionally omitted illegally intercepted electronic communications from the category of cases in which the remedy of suppression is available." He also rejected her request for a broader injunction, saying it would violate Jeffery's freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment.

Rose did say, however, that "disclosure of the information in state court by Jeffery Havlicek or his attorney" might be "actionable civilly or criminally." He suggested that the "remember me" option probably didn't give Jeffery an implied right to view his wife's e-mail messages. And he ordered Jeffery to provide Potter, his wife's alleged paramour, with the complete set of electronic evidence that he had planned to use in the divorce case.

Excerpt from Rose's opinion:
Because the suppression provision excludes illegally intercepted wire and oral communications from the courtroom, but does not mention electronic communications, several courts, including the Sixth Circuit, have concluded that Congress intentionally omitted illegally intercepted electronic communications from the category of cases in which the remedy of suppression is available.

With this distinction in mind, the court finds that it does not have the authority to forbid the disclosure of the allegedly intercepted communications to the state official determining custody of the Havliceks' children or any other state court proceeding. This is not to imply, however, that disclosure of the information in state court by Jeffery Havlicek or his attorney might not be actionable civilly or criminally under 18 USC (Section) 2511. In any event, the court's inability to enjoin the presentation of this evidence in state court does not resolve the question of whether the injunction on disclosing this information in other context should issue. Therefore, the court will proceed to consider the appropriateness of relief in this case, beginning with plaintiff's chances of succeeding on the merits.

Defendant's response to the motion for preliminary injunction claims that the keystroke recording and screen shot recording software do not record communications contemporaneously with the transmission of the communications. Contemporaneousness was an element originally introduced to 18 USC (Section) 2511 when the law applied only to wire and oral communications...

We conclude that the term "electronic communication" includes transient electronic storage that is intrinsic to the communication process for such communications. That conclusion is consistent with our precedent...

Moreover, the court views the screen shot software as distinct from the keystroke software in regards to the interstate commerce requirement. In contrast to the keystrokes, which, when recorded, have not traveled in interstate commerce, the incoming emails subjected to the screen shot software have traveled in interstate commerce. Additionally, there is no evidence before the court to allow any conclusion that the technical aspects of the instant case result in Potter's claim being defeated by a lack of contemporaneousness, even if the court were to find this element necessary...

Defendant raises another hurdle to success on the merits, however, by referring to the case of United States v. Ropp, which focuses on the requirement in 18 USC (Section) 2510(12) that the interception be of an interstate or foreign communication or be of a communication affecting interstate commerce. Ropp notes that keystroke software records the entirely internal transmission from the keyboard to the CPU, and records all keystrokes, whether they initiate signals destined to travel in interstate commerce or not. The decision, however, seems to read the statute as requiring the communication to be traveling in interstate commerce, rather than merely "affecting" interstate commerce. It seems to this court that the keystrokes that send a message off into interstate commerce "affect" interstate commerce...

Because the ECPA does not provide for the relief of suppression of illegally intercepted electronic communications sought to be used as evidence in a court case, and because a balancing of plaintiff's impending irreparable harms and the public interest in the requested injunction against plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits of her claims weighs in favor of not granting the requested injunction, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, Doc. 16, is denied.

See more CNET content tagged:
Police Blotter, affidavit, electronic document, divorce, wife

24 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
just pissed..
Here is speculation on how it went.... husband thinks wife is having
affaire with another man, places monitoring software on
computer..., finds out she's having affaire with another woman...,
thinks, "I been trying to get her to do this for years with 3 way",
calls her on it and says" hey, I want to play too, and do the 3 way
thing", wife and female friend say no way.., he gets pissed, and
says some choice words, and says I'll fix her by embarrasing her in
public, and then divorcing her...., uhhhh, that sounds about right.
Posted by smithjones (103 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Err, no.
Sorry, but the odds are extremely good that your scenario ain't the case: there's too much betrayal, mistrust, and disrespect coming at you from the cheating spouse involved to suddenly start thinking about something normally seen in the average porn mag. If kids are involved, then there's a lot more to be pissed about on top of all that... again, not something that would give way at all to thoughts of 'menage, y'dig?

/P
Posted by Penguinisto (5042 comments )
Link Flag
reality should have kicked in recken not
you realy think thats how it went mmmmmm after reading the story i didn't see a mention of that being said maybe i missed it dought it tho mmmm but gather u take her side i wonder if u and her are alike.
Posted by elliottfire (14 comments )
Link Flag
Or he's pissed because...
he found out his wife was having an affair with a 350lb shaved-head bull who insists on using words like HERstory, antiHERstamine, and HERstrionics.
Posted by jd1023948 (47 comments )
Link Flag
just pissed..
Here is speculation on how it went.... husband thinks wife is having
affaire with another man, places monitoring software on
computer..., finds out she's having affaire with another woman...,
thinks, "I been trying to get her to do this for years with 3 way",
calls her on it and says" hey, I want to play too, and do the 3 way
thing", wife and female friend say no way.., he gets pissed, and
says some choice words, and says I'll fix her by embarrasing her in
public, and then divorcing her...., uhhhh, that sounds about right.
Posted by smithjones (103 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Err, no.
Sorry, but the odds are extremely good that your scenario ain't the case: there's too much betrayal, mistrust, and disrespect coming at you from the cheating spouse involved to suddenly start thinking about something normally seen in the average porn mag. If kids are involved, then there's a lot more to be pissed about on top of all that... again, not something that would give way at all to thoughts of 'menage, y'dig?

/P
Posted by Penguinisto (5042 comments )
Link Flag
reality should have kicked in recken not
you realy think thats how it went mmmmmm after reading the story i didn't see a mention of that being said maybe i missed it dought it tho mmmm but gather u take her side i wonder if u and her are alike.
Posted by elliottfire (14 comments )
Link Flag
Or he's pissed because...
he found out his wife was having an affair with a 350lb shaved-head bull who insists on using words like HERstory, antiHERstamine, and HERstrionics.
Posted by jd1023948 (47 comments )
Link Flag
Wise Up
In this case, I think that the wife is guilty of being terminally naive.
In this world, one does not engage in secret affairs on a computer
used by many other people and without password protection. It's
obvious to me that we cannot count on protection under the law at
all. It behooves us to conduct our "affairs" accordingly.

Glee
Posted by GlaeWitch (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Wise Up
In this case, I think that the wife is guilty of being terminally naive.
In this world, one does not engage in secret affairs on a computer
used by many other people and without password protection. It's
obvious to me that we cannot count on protection under the law at
all. It behooves us to conduct our "affairs" accordingly.

Glee
Posted by GlaeWitch (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Feminism is a Sickness, learn about Misandry!
Feminism is based on hatred against men and is MISANDRIST.

Facts on Misandry
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry</a>

Learn about Misandry
Posted by nabilzariffa2 (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Speaking of sickness...
you seem to have a real ax to grind. If I were you, I'd be looking for a good shrink.
Posted by fcekuahd (244 comments )
Link Flag
a better source, perhaps?
In case you would like people to become educated about a topic, it
might serve to perhaps offer a better alternative than wikipedia...

As CNET News reports:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.cbsi.com/2061-11199_3-6163357.html" target="_newWindow">http://news.cbsi.com/2061-11199_3-6163357.html</a>
Posted by leiju (3 comments )
Link Flag
Feminism is a Sickness, learn about Misandry!
Feminism is based on hatred against men and is MISANDRIST.

Facts on Misandry
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry</a>

Learn about Misandry
Posted by nabilzariffa2 (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Speaking of sickness...
you seem to have a real ax to grind. If I were you, I'd be looking for a good shrink.
Posted by fcekuahd (244 comments )
Link Flag
a better source, perhaps?
In case you would like people to become educated about a topic, it
might serve to perhaps offer a better alternative than wikipedia...

As CNET News reports:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.cbsi.com/2061-11199_3-6163357.html" target="_newWindow">http://news.cbsi.com/2061-11199_3-6163357.html</a>
Posted by leiju (3 comments )
Link Flag
Anybody who cheats on his/her spouse...
deserves to get royally dragged through the mud and publicly humiliated. We should bring back the stockade for this kind of behavior.
Posted by fcekuahd (244 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Agreement
Infidelity is painful and humiliating to the wronged partner, there's no reason in the world why the perpetrator(s) should be spared that pain. That said, I do hope the gentleman realizes he can only push this so far. It sounds trite, but vengence is never sweet; it can't make her love him again.

Frankly, it's rather surprising people are still so naive when it comes to electronic communications. It doesn't take a hardcore developer to know that electronic communications can be copied and traced.
Posted by brianpaige (8 comments )
Link Flag
Anybody who cheats on his/her spouse...
deserves to get royally dragged through the mud and publicly humiliated. We should bring back the stockade for this kind of behavior.
Posted by fcekuahd (244 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Agreement
Infidelity is painful and humiliating to the wronged partner, there's no reason in the world why the perpetrator(s) should be spared that pain. That said, I do hope the gentleman realizes he can only push this so far. It sounds trite, but vengence is never sweet; it can't make her love him again.

Frankly, it's rather surprising people are still so naive when it comes to electronic communications. It doesn't take a hardcore developer to know that electronic communications can be copied and traced.
Posted by brianpaige (8 comments )
Link Flag
There is a very easy solution to problems like this...
Be honest with your partner. Even if being honest is uncomfortable;
even if it means telling your partner things that you think he or she
might not want to hear.
Posted by tacit (503 comments )
Reply Link Flag
There is a very easy solution to problems like this...
Be honest with your partner. Even if being honest is uncomfortable;
even if it means telling your partner things that you think he or she
might not want to hear.
Posted by tacit (503 comments )
Reply Link Flag
?
I don't know what all the fuss is about ! If their relationship is that full of mistrust then surely it is better to call it a day, rather than making each other miserable. And the details don't really matter. The only reason the husband wants them "aired" is to get his own back which is very childish and petty. And not showing their children a "very good example". They are going to suffer more than his wife.
Posted by annclare (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
?
I don't know what all the fuss is about ! If their relationship is that full of mistrust then surely it is better to call it a day, rather than making each other miserable. And the details don't really matter. The only reason the husband wants them "aired" is to get his own back which is very childish and petty. And not showing their children a "very good example". They are going to suffer more than his wife.
Posted by annclare (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.