April 7, 2006 6:15 PM PDT
Police Blotter: Ex-employee's Yahoo Mail subpoenaed
- Related Stories
Police blotter: Porn-dialing firm loses appealMarch 31, 2006
Police blotter: Schools' IT chief loses bribery appealMarch 24, 2006
Police blotter: Judge orders Gmail disclosureMarch 17, 2006
Judge to help feds against GoogleMarch 14, 2006
Police blotter: Ex-employee faces suit over file deletionMarch 10, 2006
Police blotter: Cell phone tracking rejectedMarch 3, 2006
Police blotter: Dot-com magnate loses fraud appealFebruary 24, 2006
Police blotter: Patriot Act e-mail spying approvedFebruary 9, 2006
Verbatim: Search firms surveyed on privacyFebruary 3, 2006
Police blotter: Sysadmin loses e-intrusion caseJanuary 13, 2006
Police blotter: Alleged eDonkey pirate gets trialJanuary 6, 2006
Police blotter: Nude 'profile' yields Yahoo suitDecember 9, 2005
Police blotter: Legal flap over secret sex videoNovember 25, 2005
Police blotter: Judge questions Patriot Act bugsNovember 4, 2005
Police blotter: Feds' cell phone tracking deniedOctober 28, 2005
What: A Vermont bioscience company sues former employee over his personal academic Web site and wants the contents of his Yahoo Mail account.
When: A federal judge in Vermont ruled on March 30.
Outcome: U.S. District Judge J. Garvan Murtha does not dismiss subpoena.
What happened, according to court documents: Sometime around 1995, Robert Boehringer began working as a senior software engineer for MicroBrightField, a bioscience company in Williston, Vt. He signed a standard employee confidentiality agreement when hired.
Boehringer's specialty was research into stereology, the science of three-dimensional interpretations of two-dimensional images, and MBF paid for his master's degree in computer science at Virginia Tech.
Using his academic account, he created a Web site on Virginia Tech's computers that is now password-protected. A version saved on Archive.org in 2004 includes a wealth of information about stereology from a math-intensive, academic perspective. His personal home page is not password-protected.
(Here's an excerpt from Archive.org: "There are a number of ways to randomly apply a fraction. Here are two ways. One way is to select a fraction f and then select the first nf sections as set 1, the next nf sections as set 2, and so forth...")
This is where the tale becomes murky. MBF claims it demanded that Boehringer move his Web site from Virginia Tech to the corporate servers, and he refused. Around the same time, the company says his performance at work "began to decline significantly" and that he "did not promptly complete work assigned to him."
In any case, in 2005, Boehringer quit and joined Visiopharm, a Denmark-based company selling software that competes with MBF's own products.
MBF claims that Boehringer sent in his resignation on July 14 and made it retroactive to July 1 but nevertheless accessed MBF's source code repositories eight times in early July.
The relationship soured. MBF's lawyer started sending nasty-grams to its former employee alleging trade secret infringement and copyright infringement (a few MBF PowerPoint presentations and photographs from corporate literature were apparently on the Virginia Tech site). MBF went so far as to register the copyright for the Virginia Tech Web site, claiming it owned all of Boehringer's writings because they were a "work for hire."
Eventually MBF sued Boehringer alleging copyright infringement, breach of contract, trade secret theft, and violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (for allegedly accessing the source code repository). It also sent a subpoena to Yahoo for the contents of Boehringer's e-mail account.
Boehringer's lawyer filed a motion to quash the subpoena, saying it was a family account and was also used for attorney-client communications.
Judge Murtha said, however, that the subpoena was filed in the Northern District of California and therefore "the court is without jurisdiction to consider the motions to quash."
For the record, Boehringer denies MBF's allegations. He also has the option of filing a motion to quash the Yahoo subpoena in California.
13 commentsJoin the conversation! Add your comment