February 25, 2008 12:56 PM PST

Police Blotter: Armed robbers nabbed through text messages

Related Stories

Police Blotter: E911 rules aid police in tracking cell phones

February 8, 2008

Police Blotter: Intoxilyzer code must be disclosed

January 28, 2008

Police Blotter: Can Circuit City techs legally peruse files?

December 14, 2007

Police Blotter: Verizon forced to turn over text messages

December 5, 2007

Police Blotter: MySpace profile sets convicted felon free

November 30, 2007

Police Blotter: Dot-com swindler goes to prison

November 21, 2007

Police Blotter: Can a cell phone camera intimidate a witness?

November 16, 2007

Police Blotter: Did blogging juror affect DUI trial?

November 9, 2007

Police Blotter: Is computer-generated pornography illegal?

November 2, 2007

Police Blotter: Craigslist toddler giveaway ad sparks suit

October 26, 2007

Police Blotter: Official can't be fired in sex e-mail flap

October 17, 2007

Police Blotter: Is it legal to use an alias anymore?

October 12, 2007

Police Blotter: Fired worker blames porn on malware

October 3, 2007

Police Blotter: Justice Dept.'s warrantless eavesdropping rejected

September 26, 2007

Police Blotter: Porn spammers' guilty verdict upheld

September 7, 2007

Police Blotter: MySpace profile becomes part of rape conviction

August 16, 2007

Police Blotter: Defendant wins breathalyzer source code

August 9, 2007

Police Blotter: Fake gay HotorNot profile draws suit

July 13, 2007

Police Blotter: Dark side of 'reputation defending' service

June 29, 2007

Police Blotter: Necrobabes.com leads to murder conviction

June 21, 2007

Police Blotter: Teenage murderers convicted through IM logs

June 13, 2007

Police Blotter: Court overturns man's Net ban for life

June 6, 2007

Police Blotter: Cops need warrant to search cell phone?

May 30, 2007

Police Blotter: Bondage Webmaster fights abuse conviction

May 23, 2007

Police Blotter: Imprisoned sex offenders demand PCs

May 16, 2007

Police blotter: Fired federal worker sues over googling

May 9, 2007

Police blotter: Can someone else let cops search your PC?

May 2, 2007

Police blotter: Secret recording inadmissible against bus driver

April 25, 2007

Police blotter: Cops OK to copy cell phone content

April 19, 2007

Police blotter: Open Wi-Fi blamed in child porn case

April 18, 2007

Police blotter: Sensual masseuse sues ex-customer

April 11, 2007

Police blotter: No privacy in home PC brought to work

April 5, 2007

Police blotter: Ex-employee sued for deleting files

March 28, 2007

Police blotter: Unbrotherly love in Craigslist sex ad

March 21, 2007

Police blotter: Computer logs as alibi in wife's death

March 14, 2007

Police blotter: FBI's 'misleading' wiretap suppressed

March 7, 2007

Police blotter: Wife e-surveilled in divorce case

March 1, 2007

Police blotter: Convicted eBay robber loses appeal

February 21, 2007

Police blotter: Wireless voyeur appeals 56-year term

February 14, 2007

Police blotter: Texas student guilty in SSN hack

February 2, 2007

Police blotter: Heirs sue over will-making software

January 24, 2007

Police blotter: Antispam activist fights lawsuit

January 19, 2007

Police blotter: Silicon Valley burglars busted

January 12, 2007

Police blotter: Detecting computer-generated porn?

January 3, 2007

Police blotter: Web at heart of ecoterror lawsuit

December 27, 2006

Police blotter: Google searches nab wireless hacker

December 20, 2006

Police blotter: Fired over 'Wicked Weasel' photo

December 8, 2006

Police blotter: Child porn in Web cache OK

November 24, 2006

Police blotter: Florida judges target Net sex

November 17, 2006

Police blotter: Prison inmate wants personal ad replies

November 10, 2006

Police blotter: Child porn blamed on computer virus

November 3, 2006

Police blotter: Web cookies become defendant's alibi

October 27, 2006

Police blotter: Flap over nude photos of Cameron Diaz

October 20, 2006

Police blotter: Prosecutors want reporters' hard drives

October 13, 2006

Police blotter: Sex offender demands Playboy on PC

October 6, 2006

Police blotter: When can cops seize your computer?

September 29, 2006

Police blotter: Alleged al-Qaida hacker goes to court

September 22, 2006

Police blotter: Cops raid Usenet provider over porn

September 8, 2006

Police blotter: Judge OKs text message use in drug case

September 1, 2006

Police blotter: Trojan horse leads to porn convictions

August 25, 2006

Police blotter: Mortgage 'spammers' sued by ISP

July 14, 2006

Police blotter: SBC sued over deleted screenplay

July 7, 2006

Police blotter: Student sues over IM-related suspension

June 30, 2006

Police blotter: Husband spies on wife's computer

June 16, 2006

Police blotter: eBay suit over $380,000 Porsche

May 26, 2006

Police blotter: 911 dispatcher misuses database, kills ex-girlfriend

May 19, 2006

Police blotter: Enhanced video used to convict arsonist

May 12, 2006

Police blotter: Wells Fargo not required to encrypt data

April 14, 2006

Police blotter: Porn-dialing firm loses appeal

March 31, 2006

Police blotter: Schools' IT chief loses bribery appeal

March 24, 2006

Police blotter: Judge orders Gmail disclosure

March 17, 2006

Police blotter: Ex-employee faces suit over file deletion

March 10, 2006

Police blotter: Cell phone tracking rejected

March 3, 2006

Police blotter: Dot-com magnate loses fraud appeal

February 24, 2006

Police blotter: Patriot Act e-mail spying approved

February 9, 2006

Police blotter: Sysadmin loses e-intrusion case

January 13, 2006

Police blotter: Alleged eDonkey pirate gets trial

January 6, 2006

Police blotter: Nude 'profile' yields Yahoo suit

December 9, 2005

Police blotter: Legal flap over secret sex video

November 25, 2005

Police blotter: Judge questions Patriot Act bugs

November 4, 2005

Police blotter: Feds' cell phone tracking denied

October 28, 2005
Police Blotter is a weekly CNET News.com report on the intersection of technology and the law.

What: Armed-robbery defendants object to the use of their text messages as evidence in their criminal trials.

When: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on February 12.

Outcome: Convictions upheld.

What happened, according to court documents:
Two men convicted of armed robbery made the mistake of using text messages--which their wireless provider turned over to police when asked.

Derrick McCreary and his co-defendant, Jonathan Hunter, were accused of masterminding heists at credit unions, with one article in Credit Union Journal reporting that they made off with almost $300,000.

Prosecutors obtained the contents of the archived text messages by sending a grand jury subpoena to SkyTel. McCreary and Hunter were each convicted of one count of conspiracy, two counts of bank robbery, and two counts of using a firearm in a violent crime. They appealed.

This isn't the first time the Police Blotter has covered how telecommunications providers store copies of text messages--and how police have obtained them to use in criminal prosecutions.

An alleged cocaine dealer in the Washington, D.C., area had his SMS text messages used against him, as did a wire fraud defendant last year. They also popped up in the Kobe Bryant sex case and the trial involving the attempted murder of rapper 50 Cent.

Some of the ground rules remain unsettled, with defense attorneys frequently arguing that privacy laws and the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment suggest that archived text messages should be--legally speaking--difficult to obtain. Police, on the other hand, believe that they should be much easier to obtain.

In last year's wire fraud case, defense attorneys said prosecutors should have requested a proper search warrant signed by a judge. They lost, with the judge saying only a subpoena signed by a prosecutor was needed.

In the current armed-robbery case, McCreary, one of the defendants, asked the district court judge in January 2005 to suppress the text messages obtained from SkyTel on the grounds that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment and the Stored Communications Act. Hunter joined that motion. (SkyTel sells pagers and two-way messaging devices.)

In May 2005, U.S. District Judge Frederick J. Martone denied that request. Earlier this month, so did the 9th Circuit, which concluded that the evidence against McCreary was so overwhelming, it wasn't even going to bother worrying about text messages.

Hunter, the other armed-robbery defendant in the same proceeding, claimed that the text messages were improperly authenticated and that the full contents, rather than a summary, should have been admitted as evidence. The 9th Circuit rejected his argument as well.

Excerpts from the 9th Circuit's decision in U.S. v. McCreary:
The investigation of the two robberies revealed that McCreary and his co-defendant, Jonathan Hunter, communicated by text messages in planning the two robberies. The government had a grand-jury subpoena issued to the service provider, MCI/SkyTel, seeking the toll records, including the text of the messages.

McCreary contends that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in these messages and that the acquisition of these messages by a grand-jury subpoena without a search warrant violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that to the extent 18 U.S.C. Section 2703 of the Stored Communications Act authorized obtaining the text messages without probable cause and a search warrant, it violated his Fourth Amendment rights.

We do not reach this contention because we conclude that any error in admission of the text messages was harmless. The government presented overwhelming separate, independent evidence of McCreary's guilt. The government presented the testimony of two of the co-conspirators, who participated in the robberies detailing McCreary's leadership in planning the robberies, providing clothes and guns, and giving instructions as to how the robberies were to be conducted and the getaway to be achieved. McCreary's participation was also corroborated by other substantial evidence.

Excerpts from the 9th Circuit's decision in U.S. v. Hunter:
Hunter claims that the text message testimony was improperly authenticated and that the text messages were improperly admitted because only summarized excerpts were admitted. However, these claims lack merit.

"A document can be authenticated by the testimony of a witness with knowledge." United States v. Workinger. Here, the government properly authenticated the text messages by using the testimonies of the senior manager of the pagers' service provider, the FBI agent who compiled the records, and Hunter's co-conspirators.

Excerpts of a compilation of evidence are admissible. United States v. Soulard, 730 F.2d 1292, 1300-01 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that a summary chart of evidence was properly admitted). If the defendant objects to the summary of the evidence, he cannot have the evidence excluded, but instead can compel the government to introduce the rest of the incomplete evidence. Id. at 1301. Therefore, the court properly admitted the excerpts of text messages.

See more CNET content tagged:
text message, Police Blotter, subpoena, defendant, prosecutor


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Reasonable expectation of privacy?
What country were they in? In this country (US), there is no such thing--particularly if the technology used for communication is less than 20 years old.

There guys were criminals and got what they deserved. But the arguments they made about the privacy of text-messaging got no attention. We all have a significantly reduced expectation of privacy as a result of cell phones, internet and text-messaging.
Posted by Pete Bardo (687 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Expectation of Privacy in the USA? NFW, No...Way!!
They should realize there is no such thing as privacy when it comes to anything involving the wireless or wired telephone network or the Internet. But to use text messages to plan their heist, it goes on "your permanent record" as they used to say---give them 20 years for robbery; but give them life for stupidity. Let's hope they haven't sired any offspring.
Posted by spruceman (38 comments )
Reply Link Flag
drug war ideology pouring over
The "new professionalism" cop [and supreme court] harbor the notion that if, you appear guilty in their minds that, constitutional violations are acceptable.

Then if they are wrong either a bullet to the head of the defendant or a simple apology for the dead dog and ransacked,bullet riddled home should be acceptable.

we have come full circle to the days of law by "the crown". Shoot first ask questions later.

They may have been right this time but, how do we know? There are no constitutional protections in place therefore, any evidence is good evidence.
Posted by nedmorlef (49 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Welcome to the 21st century privacy no longer exists
People can be tracked via their web searching habits as well. All of that is public info for anyone who wants it. Most of that stuff is sold from Internet Databases for $35 and all you need to track someone is their email address, pay the $35, and get their Internet History.

Cell phone text messages are stored the same way, and also available for purchase. That is how cell phone companies target text message advertising to you, based on your prior text message history. It is also how email spam and Google AdWords work as well based on web browsing history.

Privacy is an illusion, it never existed. Anyone can be tracked even if they use anonymous means, eventually you can track the IP address they used even if you have to pull it out of proxy server logs. Once they got your IP address, they can tell what country you live in and what part of that country you are from. Then your ISP can tell them what your personal info is, by request, sometimes your ISP sells that personal info to the highest bidders, and Internet databases sell it for profit to spammers, etc.
Posted by Andy kaufman (291 comments )
Reply Link Flag
This sounds over the line by the authorities. What would be
different if we would do the same to the whitehouse or elected
officials and pull up messages on their PDA's or textmessage
history if the phone is paid for by the taxpayer. I see nothing
illegal with the last one if they are not paying their own bill.
Imagine the dirt you could find.

The entire point is privacy. We expect message logs to be
erased. FISA should not have permission to dig unless you are
dirty as the garbage dump. Same with emails.

I guess this tells us we need to learn a new code when sending
messages to keep the suits off our back.
Posted by Travis Ernst (170 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.