ie8 fix

Glacier meltdowns amid global warming

To study the impact of global warming, Bruce Molnia, a research geologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, decided to take contemporary photographs of Alaskan glaciers from the exact spot where photographers captured images around the turn of the century. The above photograph shows the bottom end, or calving terminus, of Muir Glacier in June 1899.

Credit: U.S. Geological Survey

Muir 1899

16 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
141 nations signed Kyoto ...
All developped nation signed, major developping countries signed.

As you all know, a nation is needed and missing : the USA.

California's environmental laws are tougher than what Kyoto requires, yet it's economy is doing pretty well, in fact Kyoto opens opportunities for tech oriented businesses. Since it's beyond oil / armament business, Bush probably can't even see it.

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol</a>
Posted by My-Self (242 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Let's let 'em
Let's see...the nations that ratified KA, represent well over half of the world's emissions. The agreement requires them to lower emissions by a whopping 5%. Let's say we trade with them - the US will lower its emissions by 1%, they lower theirs by 8%. In exchange we'll fight a one or more wars for their benefit. If climate change is as dangerous as they claim, sureley they can pull out another one or two percent decrease in emissions. The US will continue to manufacture products, they can warehouse them and resell them at a nice profit, unless of course they can create steel and other heavy-industry products using their California high-tech industry.
Posted by sanenazok (3047 comments )
Link Flag
You forgot Australia
Not only did the US *not* sign the Protocol, nor did Australia. Being an Aussie, I am deeply ashamed and disgusted with my Government. Profit before planetary survival?
Posted by (1 comment )
Link Flag
Global Warming and Glaciers
This just goes to show you that no matter how intelligent or technical you might be, you are still subject of preconceived beliefs and what (limited) information you hear. This web site explains how the "scientists" have used the regular shifting of glaciers to claim the sky is falling ...

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Ingles3/UpsalaEng.html" target="_newWindow">http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Ingles3/UpsalaEng.html</a>

This website (which uses very convincing facts) says, "... it would take from 10,000 to 100,000 years for a Polar ice pack to respond to any warming happening now. For a big mountain glacier it would take about 1,000 to 10,000 years for responding to a present warming, while for small mountain glaciers it would take about a 100 to 1,000 years response to the change. Thus, the explanation for the present retreat of some glaciers is: they are responding to a natural warming that occurred, during the Medieval Warm period, in the 11th Century, or to an even warmer period that happened 6.000 years ago."

Stick to your computers and networking and don't listen to chicken little.

MHampton
Posted by Matthew hampton (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
your flawed logic
whatever the motivation behind such claims may be: one thing remains the same. We KNOW how much fuel we have left (oil/coal). We KNOW when it will run out. And we KNOW that once it's gone, we'll need an alternative. Whether it be our children, their children or twenty generations from now, at some point in the future, we'll need another viable source of energy. We should start looking now, so the infrastructure is in place when it's need.

I don't know about you, but i don't want to have to pay $100/gallon for gasoline twenty years down the line.
Posted by mortis9 (370 comments )
Link Flag
Another example...
... of the Ostrich mentality. ANyone who tries to argue that
global warming in NOT happening is demonstrating a terminal
case of stupidity. And burning fossile fuesl is a major
conttributor. Other contributors include cow and termite farts.

Whatever, iglobal warming is happening, so get your head out
of the sand.... especially if you're on a beach near the current
sea level.
Posted by Earl Benser (4342 comments )
Link Flag
Do you really believe what you are saying
It's people that think like you that we haven't moved to other sources of energy.
When without a doubt oil based types of energy have been proven to be quite inefficient, they are just easy to obtain and process and don't require the use of our brain to develop something better...
Posted by (4 comments )
Link Flag
Glaciers Come and Go
Its nice to see what is under the ice. thisis not a surprise, it has been going on for centuries.
Weather changes everywhere everyday. We may not like some of the cycles but they are a fact of life and nature.
Posted by married (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Alaskan beachfront?
Obviously time to buy some real estate up in Alaska. Can "Alaskan Tropics" bikinis babes be far off?
Posted by beesh (19 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Glaciers Happen
Sounds like a common expression with a different noun :/
Certainly you don't think the radical climatic change can't be traced to man's pollution of the atmosphere?
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Global warming
I have read both sides of the Global Warming argument and am not sure which to believe. One comment I have though is that for much of this winter in the NE United States where I live, it has been unseasonably warm (50's and 60's). However, every day when you look the record highs for these dates (in January and February) many of them are in the 70s and occurred around 100 years ago. (such as 75 in Jan. in 1906, or 72 today Feb 26th in 1880). I think currently what we are seeing is a natural cycle, though this does not address any holes in the ozone layer.
Posted by hergieburbur (10 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Gore's movie
If you don't go see Al Gore's movie, An Inconvienient
Truth, be prepared to tell your kids why you did not.
Posted by vegasrozo (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

CONTINUED:
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
  • Recently Viewed Products
  • My Lists
  • My Software Updates
  • Promo
  • Log In | Join CNET