All developped nation signed, major developping countries signed.
As you all know, a nation is needed and missing : the USA.
California's environmental laws are tougher than what Kyoto requires, yet it's economy is doing pretty well, in fact Kyoto opens opportunities for tech oriented businesses. Since it's beyond oil / armament business, Bush probably can't even see it.
This just goes to show you that no matter how intelligent or technical you might be, you are still subject of preconceived beliefs and what (limited) information you hear. This web site explains how the "scientists" have used the regular shifting of glaciers to claim the sky is falling ...
This website (which uses very convincing facts) says, "... it would take from 10,000 to 100,000 years for a Polar ice pack to respond to any warming happening now. For a big mountain glacier it would take about 1,000 to 10,000 years for responding to a present warming, while for small mountain glaciers it would take about a 100 to 1,000 years response to the change. Thus, the explanation for the present retreat of some glaciers is: they are responding to a natural warming that occurred, during the Medieval Warm period, in the 11th Century, or to an even warmer period that happened 6.000 years ago."
Stick to your computers and networking and don't listen to chicken little.
Its nice to see what is under the ice. thisis not a surprise, it has been going on for centuries. Weather changes everywhere everyday. We may not like some of the cycles but they are a fact of life and nature.
Sounds like a common expression with a different noun :/ Certainly you don't think the radical climatic change can't be traced to man's pollution of the atmosphere?
I have read both sides of the Global Warming argument and am not sure which to believe. One comment I have though is that for much of this winter in the NE United States where I live, it has been unseasonably warm (50's and 60's). However, every day when you look the record highs for these dates (in January and February) many of them are in the 70s and occurred around 100 years ago. (such as 75 in Jan. in 1906, or 72 today Feb 26th in 1880). I think currently what we are seeing is a natural cycle, though this does not address any holes in the ozone layer.
As you all know, a nation is needed and missing : the USA.
California's environmental laws are tougher than what Kyoto requires, yet it's economy is doing pretty well, in fact Kyoto opens opportunities for tech oriented businesses. Since it's beyond oil / armament business, Bush probably can't even see it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol
http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Ingles3/UpsalaEng.html
This website (which uses very convincing facts) says, "... it would take from 10,000 to 100,000 years for a Polar ice pack to respond to any warming happening now. For a big mountain glacier it would take about 1,000 to 10,000 years for responding to a present warming, while for small mountain glaciers it would take about a 100 to 1,000 years response to the change. Thus, the explanation for the present retreat of some glaciers is: they are responding to a natural warming that occurred, during the Medieval Warm period, in the 11th Century, or to an even warmer period that happened 6.000 years ago."
Stick to your computers and networking and don't listen to chicken little.
MHampton
Weather changes everywhere everyday. We may not like some of the cycles but they are a fact of life and nature.
Certainly you don't think the radical climatic change can't be traced to man's pollution of the atmosphere?
- Gore's movie
- by vegasrozo June 26, 2006 3:47 PM PDT
- If you don't go see Al Gore's movie, An Inconvienient
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)Truth, be prepared to tell your kids why you did not.