June 7, 2005 9:27 AM PDT

Patent ruling costs Microsoft $8.9 million

SANTA ANA, Calif.--A jury in U.S. federal court found that Microsoft infringed on a Guatemalan inventor's 1994 patent on technology linking the company's Access and Excel programs, and ordered the world's largest software maker to pay $8.9 million in damages.

A jury in the U.S. District Court of Central California told Microsoft to pay the award to Carlos Armando Amado for software that uses a single spreadsheet to link Excel, a spreadsheet and calculation program, with the Access database application.

The jury award takes into account Microsoft software sold between March 1997 and July 2003. U.S. District Judge David Carter will review the case to determine how much, if any, additional damages should be awarded for programs sold to date, plaintiff's attorney Vincent Belusko said.

"Mr. Amado has pursued this for many years now, but while it's been a difficult effort, he's happy that he has some recognition," Belusko said.

In his lawsuit, Amado said he filed for a patent in 1990 for the software linking the two Microsoft programs and that he unsuccessfully tried to sell it to Microsoft two years later, while the patent was pending.

The jury awarded one out of a total of 10 counts filed and dismissed the other nine, which could have led to hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.

"While today's verdict is disappointing, we are pleased the jury rejected Mr. Amado's large damages claims. We do not believe today's verdict will have any impact on our customers," said Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake.

Microsoft, based in Redmond, Wash., began using his software without permission in various versions of Access, such as Access 95, 97, 2000 and 2002, according to Amado, who said he created the technology while he was a graduate student at Stanford University.

3 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
I dont get why
someone should be allowed to get a patent basically on other programs... as the software requires these two programs
Posted by volterwd (466 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Because...
The patent system is screwed up just like everything else our's any one else's goverment sticks their fingers in to. The greed and stupidity runs too deep for anything done by such governments to be anything other than screwed up.

Robert
Posted by (336 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Lame
How can anyone lay claim to a patent that allows communication between 2 apps?

That is like patenting the wheel.

Bad decision, and more reasons why software patents need to end.
Posted by Bill Dautrive (1180 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

Inside CNET News

1-2 of 12

Scroll Left Scroll Right

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Microsoft (-0.89%) -0.28 30.50
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.69%) -89.23 12,801.23
S&P 500 (-0.69%) -9.31 1,342.64
NASDAQ (-0.80%) -23.35 2,903.88
CNET TECH (-0.58%) -11.91 2,032.01
  Symbol Lookup