Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?

September 26, 2005 10:45 AM PDT

Palm does Windows

  • 34 comments
SAN FRANCISCO--In an acknowledgment that the market for the Palm operating system has run out of steam, the maker of the popular Treo cell phone on Monday unveiled a version that runs Windows.

Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates joined Palm Chief Executive Ed Colligan and Verizon Wireless CEO Denny Strigl to demonstrate the device at a press event here. Although enthusiast sites have been calling the product the Treo 700w, Colligan said the company was not yet announcing the name and dubbed it simply "Treo for Windows."

The move unites two companies, Palm and Microsoft, that have been significant rivals in the market for software that powers handhelds and other mobile devices.

New Treo

"If you've been in this business long enough, you know that partners sometimes compete and competitors sometimes partner," Colligan said.

Palm has long said it would consider using an operating system other than the Palm OS. However, the company has not done so until now. Colligan said that Palm only wanted to make the move if it would help the company land new customers, which he said it will do.

Gates echoed the sentiment.

"I think a lot of mobile windows users will want to switch to this device," he said. "The big challenge will be keeping this product in stock."

Palm did not give out the full technical details of the device, declining to say, for example, how much memory it will have. The company did say the phone will have an Intel chip, run Windows Mobile 5.0 and be able to take advantage of push e-mail. With its color touch screen and QWERTY keyboard, the device is very similar in appearance to the existing Treos though it adds some Windows-specific buttons, such as an OK button that takes a user back to a previous screen.

A demonstration of the product included broadcast radio capabilities, photo-triggered speed dial and the ability to play back messages using VCR-like controls. Colligan said the device would also ship with an internal camera and a storage expansion slot for SD-cards. Access to Wi-Fi networks would only be available through the built-in SD card slot, Colligan said.

Although Palm and Microsoft showed off prototypes of the new Treo at Monday's event, the companies said that the product still needs to go through more testing before it is certified to run on Verizon's network, though that company's chief executive said the product is on a "fast track."

Verizon said the new Treo smart phone will be available to customers in early 2006. Colligan said that the company expects to have meaningful sales of the product for the fiscal quarter that ends in February, suggesting the launch will come shortly after Jan. 1.

Because it is based on an EV-DO platform, it will cost more than Verizon's current Treo 650 smart phones, which go for about $500.

While the new Treo will debut with Verizon Wireless' broadband service, with download speeds averaging 400 kilobits per second to 700kbps, other carriers are expected to climb aboard in mid-2006, Colligan said.

Colligan said Palm would not extend its hardware platform to other smart-phone operating systems such as Linux or Symbian.

"We are going to focus on what we have on the table," he said. "This is for customers who want that familiar Windows user experience. Certainly for Palm, we will reach into many more companies with these devices."

Palm did not discuss how it will use the Palm OS in conjunction with the new hardware it showed off Monday. But the company has said it plans to continue developing products, including smart phones, based on the Palm OS.

Palm for some time had been entertaining the notion of a Windows-based device to woo corporate customers who are accustomed to Microsoft products and have been reluctant to buy Palm OS-based gadgets.

"This is a major win for Microsoft if you realize that the company will power two very powerful smart phones--the Motorola Q and the Palm Treo," Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg said. "It is also a good thing for corporate IT departments, which can now leverage off of a common development platform while letting their users pick the handset that is right for them."

Palm, which once had the vast majority of the handheld market, has seen its share drop in recent years. Last November, Microsoft for the first time surpassed Palm in the number of handhelds shipped using its operating system, according to Gartner. Palm said it shipped 470,000 Treo units last quarter but it still runs behind the BlackBerry.

Palm in 2003 spun off its PalmSource unit, which makes software for mobile devices, but the standalone business faltered. Earlier this month, Japanese software maker Access said it would buy PalmSource for $324 million.

Verizon, also eager to drum up more corporate accounts, has been busy partnering with other PC makers and wireless access card companies to provide access to its EV-DO networks.

CNET News.com's Ina Fried contributed to this report.

See more CNET content tagged:
Palm Treo, Palm Inc., Palm OS, smart phone, Bill Gates

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Microsoft?? Think lost sales, not gained!!!
by MattMc September 26, 2005 12:09 PM PDT
This is truly disappointing. One of the reasons I purchased a Treo was because it was NOT running a Microsoft OS. This is a company with a long laundry list of sloppy programming problems. Should I trust my data to them?
I'm sorry, I will not be upgrading if the next Treo is running Microsoft. The marketplace of sellers for devices like the Treo is growing - a buyer is not locked in to any one vendor anymore. To partner with the King of vendor lock-in is a BIG mistake - especially when the whole world is waking up to the fact that they don't want to be locked in.
BIG mistake. BIG, BIG mistake.
Reply to this comment
No
by advs89 September 26, 2005 1:22 PM PDT
I completely disagree, i own a palm m505 (i know, its old...), and i hate the ui. Especially the completely proprietary file formats, and how it isn't cross-compatible with regular media files (like jpg, avi, mp3...) without having to download a third pary tool... I was actually hoping ms would buy out palm, and make it better (although on second thought... when has microsoft ever made anything better??? - Wow, i just contradicted myself!)
View reply
Microsoft?? Think lost sales, not gained!!!
by MattMc September 26, 2005 12:09 PM PDT
This is truly disappointing. One of the reasons I purchased a Treo was because it was NOT running a Microsoft OS. This is a company with a long laundry list of sloppy programming problems. Should I trust my data to them?
I'm sorry, I will not be upgrading if the next Treo is running Microsoft. The marketplace of sellers for devices like the Treo is growing - a buyer is not locked in to any one vendor anymore. To partner with the King of vendor lock-in is a BIG mistake - especially when the whole world is waking up to the fact that they don't want to be locked in.
BIG mistake. BIG, BIG mistake.
Reply to this comment
No
by advs89 September 26, 2005 1:22 PM PDT
I completely disagree, i own a palm m505 (i know, its old...), and i hate the ui. Especially the completely proprietary file formats, and how it isn't cross-compatible with regular media files (like jpg, avi, mp3...) without having to download a third pary tool... I was actually hoping ms would buy out palm, and make it better (although on second thought... when has microsoft ever made anything better??? - Wow, i just contradicted myself!)
View reply
Microsoft??? Think "Lost Sales"
by MattMc September 26, 2005 12:10 PM PDT
This is truly disappointing. One of the reasons I purchased a Treo was because it was NOT running a Microsoft OS. This is a company with a long laundry list of sloppy programming problems. Should I trust my data to them?
I'm sorry, I will not be upgrading if the next Treo is running Microsoft. The marketplace of sellers for devices like the Treo is growing - a buyer is not locked in to any one vendor anymore. To partner with the King of vendor lock-in is a BIG mistake - especially when the whole world is waking up to the fact that they don't want to be locked in.
BIG mistake. BIG, BIG mistake.
Reply to this comment
Microsoft??? Think "Lost Sales"
by MattMc September 26, 2005 12:10 PM PDT
This is truly disappointing. One of the reasons I purchased a Treo was because it was NOT running a Microsoft OS. This is a company with a long laundry list of sloppy programming problems. Should I trust my data to them?
I'm sorry, I will not be upgrading if the next Treo is running Microsoft. The marketplace of sellers for devices like the Treo is growing - a buyer is not locked in to any one vendor anymore. To partner with the King of vendor lock-in is a BIG mistake - especially when the whole world is waking up to the fact that they don't want to be locked in.
BIG mistake. BIG, BIG mistake.
Reply to this comment
Dumb, dumb, dumb...
by September 26, 2005 1:01 PM PDT
They're shooting themselves in the foot. The
best thing about Palm was the PalmOS. What it
lacked in glitz it had in functionality,
stability, and connectivity. PalmOS is wonderful
to write for and it's synchronization has far
fewer bugs and more consistency across
applications.

I'm sorry to see Palm take such a step backward.
I fear they've lost the war, not because they're
giving in to wince, but because they are giving
up the one thing that really differntiated them
from the competition.
Reply to this comment
Looks like I've bought my last Palm unit....
by Earl Benser September 26, 2005 1:56 PM PDT
.... Windows whatever just won't cut it for me. In anything, Windows
whatever will try to make the environment so cluttered and
complicated that all utility will be lost.

And now I see why Sony dumped the Clie, my oersonal
favorite........
Palm OS is the best? You must be kidding
by Jess McLean September 26, 2005 3:34 PM PDT
I see nothing good about Palm OS. It is so user-unfriendly, it still uses the same UI since the b/w Palm days, it is so complicated to sync with PIM applications (not to mention that huge download of that Palm Sync application...talk about bloatware),and so-so screen resolution. Seriously, after Sony exits the PDA market, Palm's PDA is going downhill, and that LifeDrive is not going to save them either.

And, why just Verizon? How about Cingular and Sprint and T-Mobile?
Dumb, dumb, dumb...
by September 26, 2005 1:01 PM PDT
They're shooting themselves in the foot. The
best thing about Palm was the PalmOS. What it
lacked in glitz it had in functionality,
stability, and connectivity. PalmOS is wonderful
to write for and it's synchronization has far
fewer bugs and more consistency across
applications.

I'm sorry to see Palm take such a step backward.
I fear they've lost the war, not because they're
giving in to wince, but because they are giving
up the one thing that really differntiated them
from the competition.
Reply to this comment
Looks like I've bought my last Palm unit....
by Earl Benser September 26, 2005 1:56 PM PDT
.... Windows whatever just won't cut it for me. In anything, Windows
whatever will try to make the environment so cluttered and
complicated that all utility will be lost.

And now I see why Sony dumped the Clie, my oersonal
favorite........
Palm OS is the best? You must be kidding
by Jess McLean September 26, 2005 3:34 PM PDT
I see nothing good about Palm OS. It is so user-unfriendly, it still uses the same UI since the b/w Palm days, it is so complicated to sync with PIM applications (not to mention that huge download of that Palm Sync application...talk about bloatware),and so-so screen resolution. Seriously, after Sony exits the PDA market, Palm's PDA is going downhill, and that LifeDrive is not going to save them either.

And, why just Verizon? How about Cingular and Sprint and T-Mobile?
You folks crack me up
by David Arbogast September 26, 2005 3:09 PM PDT
Palm is not interested in an Operating System Holy War against Microsoft. They are in business to sell handheld computers, and they are employing a strategy of product diversification. The market studies have shown that they can sell more devices if they have multiple offerings, and they are out to win the battle to be a major supplier of handheld computers. If there is demand for Windows, they are missing sales by not offering Windows. Plain and simple. They have little interest in helping any of you wage a war against Microsoft. Quite the contrary... Microsoft software will help them increase sales and grow their business.
Reply to this comment
Message has been deleted.
by Jess McLean September 26, 2005 3:35 PM PDT
No Palm or Symbian
by Donoho September 26, 2005 3:50 PM PDT
"Colligan said Palm would not extend its hardware platform to other smart-phone operating systems such as Linux or Symbian."

The Palm OS has been mismanaged into obscurity. I've got nothing against a Treo for Windows, but the exclusion of Treo for Linux leaves me very disappointed.
Huh?
by September 27, 2005 12:43 PM PDT
>They are in business to sell handheld computers, and they are
>employing a strategy of product diversification

How so? They are embarking on a path of being just another hardware provider. How is that product diversification?

>Microsoft software will help them increase sales and grow their
>business.

You sound perilously close to being a MS fanboy here. What is the supporting data for your statement? Why will using MS software help Palm one iota? There is already a slew of hardware devices in the mobile market, and the unintended consuquence of this move by Palm will be to force consumers towards other Windows devices or Blackberry.
View reply
You folks crack me up
by David Arbogast September 26, 2005 3:09 PM PDT
Palm is not interested in an Operating System Holy War against Microsoft. They are in business to sell handheld computers, and they are employing a strategy of product diversification. The market studies have shown that they can sell more devices if they have multiple offerings, and they are out to win the battle to be a major supplier of handheld computers. If there is demand for Windows, they are missing sales by not offering Windows. Plain and simple. They have little interest in helping any of you wage a war against Microsoft. Quite the contrary... Microsoft software will help them increase sales and grow their business.
Reply to this comment
Message has been deleted.
by Jess McLean September 26, 2005 3:35 PM PDT
No Palm or Symbian
by Donoho September 26, 2005 3:50 PM PDT
"Colligan said Palm would not extend its hardware platform to other smart-phone operating systems such as Linux or Symbian."

The Palm OS has been mismanaged into obscurity. I've got nothing against a Treo for Windows, but the exclusion of Treo for Linux leaves me very disappointed.
Huh?
by September 27, 2005 12:43 PM PDT
>They are in business to sell handheld computers, and they are
>employing a strategy of product diversification

How so? They are embarking on a path of being just another hardware provider. How is that product diversification?

>Microsoft software will help them increase sales and grow their
>business.

You sound perilously close to being a MS fanboy here. What is the supporting data for your statement? Why will using MS software help Palm one iota? There is already a slew of hardware devices in the mobile market, and the unintended consuquence of this move by Palm will be to force consumers towards other Windows devices or Blackberry.
View reply
Et tu Palma?
by September 26, 2005 6:50 PM PDT
And there I was trying to decide if I should get a Treo650 or the iPAQ hw6500 that has a builtin GPS receiver.

The new Treo better have an edge to overcome the competition. 3G enabled or at the least builtin wifi. If not, I'd probably choose the iPAQ since they have a longer track record running Windows...
Reply to this comment
Et tu Palma?
by September 26, 2005 6:50 PM PDT
And there I was trying to decide if I should get a Treo650 or the iPAQ hw6500 that has a builtin GPS receiver.

The new Treo better have an edge to overcome the competition. 3G enabled or at the least builtin wifi. If not, I'd probably choose the iPAQ since they have a longer track record running Windows...
Reply to this comment
Hardware + Software
by Mendz September 27, 2005 1:46 AM PDT
It adds up. So there you have it. I guess it's business for Palm (the hardware company) to simply get their hardware products selling to both the Palm OS and the Windows Mobile market.
Reply to this comment
Hardware + Software
by Mendz September 27, 2005 1:46 AM PDT
It adds up. So there you have it. I guess it's business for Palm (the hardware company) to simply get their hardware products selling to both the Palm OS and the Windows Mobile market.
Reply to this comment
Too Little, Too Late...
by JuggerNaut September 27, 2005 8:36 AM PDT
The PDA market is dead, and the SmartPhone market is a whole
new ball game with a bunch of players. I say Palm is probably on
the way out since they have been unable to stay focused since
Microsoft entered the mobile market. It's too bad, it's great to have
choice and Palm made such great products (more so than
Microsoft).
Reply to this comment
Too Little, Too Late...
by JuggerNaut September 27, 2005 8:36 AM PDT
The PDA market is dead, and the SmartPhone market is a whole
new ball game with a bunch of players. I say Palm is probably on
the way out since they have been unable to stay focused since
Microsoft entered the mobile market. It's too bad, it's great to have
choice and Palm made such great products (more so than
Microsoft).
Reply to this comment
Sign me up!
by Shep September 27, 2005 10:54 AM PDT
I started with Palm way back with the Palm Pilot. I left the Palm OS a few years ago and went with a Pocket PC device. Loved the OS. Hated the hardware. I just switched back to the Palm OS with the Treo 650. Love the hardware. Hate the OS. As soon as the Treo for Windows comes out I will be the first person in line to trade in the buggy, old, tired, and feeble Palm OS for the Windows version.
Reply to this comment
Sign me up!
by Shep September 27, 2005 10:54 AM PDT
I started with Palm way back with the Palm Pilot. I left the Palm OS a few years ago and went with a Pocket PC device. Loved the OS. Hated the hardware. I just switched back to the Palm OS with the Treo 650. Love the hardware. Hate the OS. As soon as the Treo for Windows comes out I will be the first person in line to trade in the buggy, old, tired, and feeble Palm OS for the Windows version.
Reply to this comment
What the Frak?
by thedreaming September 28, 2005 7:55 AM PDT
What I always loved about Palm was the fact that it didn't run windows and now you're telling me that this new palm will? Granted, it's a phone, but I don't want windows on my phone. It's bad enough that I have it on every computer I use or even run into, now I have to have it on my phone?!
Reply to this comment
What the Frak?
by thedreaming September 28, 2005 7:55 AM PDT
What I always loved about Palm was the fact that it didn't run windows and now you're telling me that this new palm will? Granted, it's a phone, but I don't want windows on my phone. It's bad enough that I have it on every computer I use or even run into, now I have to have it on my phone?!
Reply to this comment
(34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Verizon Communications (0.00%) 0.00 29.56
Microsoft (0.18%) 0.05 28.52
Palm, Inc. (-2.16%) -0.25 11.32
Dow Jones Industrials (0.17%) 17.46 10,023.42
S&P 500 (0.25%) 2.67 1,069.30
NASDAQ (0.34%) 7.12 2,112.44
CNET TECH (0.20%) 3.03 1,538.38
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right