November 9, 2005 11:47 AM PST

Ozzie memo: 'Internet services disruption'

(continued from previous page)

ability to benefit from the Windows platform that Microsoft's services enjoy. Our services innovations will include tight integration with the Windows client via documented interfaces, so that competing services can plug into Windows in the same manner as Microsoft's services. We will compete hard and responsibly in services on the basis of software innovation and price ? and on that basis we will offer consumers and businesses the best value in the market.

Business Division
a. CONNECTED OFFICE - How would we extend or re-conceptualize Office modules to fit in this seamless model of connectedness to others, and to other applications? Should PowerPoint directly 'broadcast to the web', or let the audience take notes and respond? How should we increase the role of Office Online as the portal for productivity? What should we do to bring Office's classic COM-based publish-and-subscribe capabilities to a world where RSS and XML have become the de facto publish-and-subscribe mechanisms?

b. TELECOM TRANSFORMATION - How should our investments in RTC evolve to serve not just the enterprise, but also fully embrace the concept of grassroots adoption? How can RTC begin as an individual phenomenon, growing into a small business offering with a level of function that they'd never imagine possible, growing into the enterprise? How should we utilize service-based federation and hosting to ensure a 'just works' experience for all users, whether or not an administrator was ever involved?

c. RAPID SOLUTIONS - How can we utilize our extant products and our knowledge of the broad historical adoption of forms-based applications to jump-start an effort that could dramatically surpass offerings from Quickbase to Salesforce.com? How could we build it to scale to hundreds of millions of users at an unimaginably low cost that would change the game? How could we re-shape our client-side software offerings such as Access and Groove, and our server offerings such as SharePoint, to grow and thrive in the presence of such a service? Could these rapid solutions encourage a new ISV ecosystem and business model?

Entertainment & Devices Division
a. CONNECTED ENTERTAINMENT - How can XBox Live benefit from interconnection with other services assets, such as PC-based and mobile-based IM and VoIP? How might both the PC and XBox mutually benefit from a common marketplace? Might PC users act as spectators/participants in XBox games, and vice-versa?

b. GRASSROOTS MOBILE SERVICES ? How might the Windows Mobile device experience be transformed by for consumers by connection to a services infrastructure ? in particular one enabled by RTC-based unified communications? How might unmediated connection to a rich services infrastructure transform mobile phones into a mass market messaging, media and commerce phenomenon?

c. DEVICE/SERVICE FUSION ? What new devices might emerge if we envision hardware/software/service fusion? What new kinds of devices might be enabled by the presence of a service?

What's Different?
One perspective on this memo might be to say "This is in many ways is pretty close to what we're already working on. What's the big deal?" Or "We tried something similar years ago; why will we succeed this time?" These are understandable reactions. Many visions of the future going all the way back to "Information at Your Fingertips" contain elements of what has been laid out here.

That said, I have a number of reasons for optimism that we can deliver well on this vision. First, I know that Bill, Steve and the senior leadership team understand that Microsoft's execution effectiveness will be improved by eliminating obstacles to developing and shipping products. The recent reorganization into three divisions is a significant step, and the division presidents are committed to changes to improve our agility.

Second, we are just now completing a wave of innovation that has never been seen in this company. 2006 is going to be an amazing year for shipping products, and many across the company will be ready to take on a new mission.

Third, regardless of past aspirations, this is the right time to be focusing on services for two specific reasons: the increasing ubiquity of broadband has made it viable, and the proven economics of the advertising model has made it profitable. It can be argued, for example, whether or not Hailstorm was the 'right' undertaking. But regardless, the effort would certainly have benefited from having a known-viable services business model for which to design.

Finally, I believe at this juncture it's generally very clear to each of us why we need to transform ? the competitors, the challenges, and the opportunities. As an outsider, I was repeatedly impressed and awed over the years by how this company's talent has swarmed to effectively respond to huge business challenges and transitions.

That said, even when we've been solidly in pursuit of a common vision, our end-to-end execution of key scenarios has often been uneven ? in large part because of the complexity of doing such substantial undertakings. In any large project, the sheer number of moving parts sometimes naturally causes compartmentalization of decisions and execution. Some groups might lose sight of how their piece fits in, or worse, might develop features without a clear understanding of how they'll be used. In some cases by the time the vision is delivered, the pieces might not quite fit into the originally-envisioned coherent whole. We cannot allow the seams in our organization, or our methods

Previous page | CONTINUED: Complexity kills…
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Federal Department of Computing
No other copmpany in the world is able to brag so loudly about what they're going to do than Microsoft. It's like these memos have to be made public so that their partners and customers etc know that they really aren't asleep.

Does Google make such self-seeking and self-important pronouncements public knowledge? Not on your life.

It really is as if Microsoft is the FDC and these "policy" announcements are meant to reassure everybody that everything's on track and Google will be squashed by a billion-pound turkey that can barely waddle out its own yard ...
Posted by paulie_shanna (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Google is the giant of computing services
Pride goes before a fall.

I would much prefer that Google be the 100 pound gorilla of IT as they are definately better at benefitting others while benefitting themselves.

MS is far to greedy and fat to be of any use to the average Joe blogs, and they have no problem ripping people off as well. Google on the other hand are open and give their stuff away. They are the good guys of IT.

Google is also more in touch with what is happening and you don't see Google saying we are going to crush these guys and we are the best, even though they are the best in my opinion.
Posted by t8 (3716 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.