- Related Stories
-
Tough sell for wireless data services
March 19, 2004 -
Computing giants to debut new gear at CES
January 5, 2004 -
Comdex: Little fish in a smaller pond
November 20, 2003 -
Comdex to get with IT this year
October 27, 2003 -
Comdex organizer may file for Chapter 11
November 14, 2002 -
CES gaining ground on Comdex?
January 11, 2002 -
Comdex plays to a small house
November 13, 2001 -
Slimmer Comdex beefs up on security
November 9, 2001
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Your take
Memories of Comdex![]()
Have fond (or painful)
memories of the show? Post
your thoughts here.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
"We feel that while we could run Comdex profitably this year, it really wouldn't serve the interests of the broader IT industry," he said. The international versions of the show are expected to continue as planned.
What's new:
This year's Comdex computer trade show has been canceled, a victim of the growing interest in shows emphasizing consumer electronics and specialist IT gear.
Bottom line:
A return of the show in 2005 depends on the ability of a newly formed advisory board comprising major vendors to rally support for the annual conference.
Comdex traces its roots to a casino owner who launched the Computer Dealers Exposition in 1979. Four years later a young Bill Gates delivered his first keynote speech and demonstrated Microsoft's new DOS 2.0. Although it grew to become one of the biggest trade shows in the world, at its peak attracting more than 200,000 attendees and filling more than 1 million square feet of floor space, Comdex's fortunes have sagged in the past few years as the tech economy faltered and security jitters kept some companies from traveling.
At the same time, the semirival Consumer Electronics Show (CES) has prospered, thanks in part to tech stalwarts such as Hewlett-Packard and Dell pushing gadgets that promise fatter profit margins than PCs, which have largely become a commodity business.
News.com Poll
Faurot said many of Comdex's problems were incubated in the dot-com bubble, when the former owners of the conference alienated exhibitors with high prices for floor space and attendees began complaining that the show had grown to unmanageable proportions.
"The brand came to represent some of the excesses of the '90s," he said. "It takes time to build trust back in the brand."
Many key exhibitors--most notably Dell--pulled out of Comdex in the late 1990s and to date have reappeared only on the sidelines, entertaining customers and press at private events away from the main show floor. (Dell had a small floor display at last year's show.) Faurot acknowledged that the practice of renting a hotel suite rather than booth space also hurt Comdex.
"It did create a tremendous sense of frustration," he said.
MediaLive last year tried to recast Comdex as a specialist show for IT managers, but the event drew only a handful of big-name exhibitors--despite modest cuts in the price of booth space--and a crowd of about 40,000 "qualified buyers," Faurot said.
The lackluster exhibitor lineup--about 550 largely smaller companies, many from Asia pushing narrow products such as hard drive enclosures--also hurt last year's show. In hopes of remedying that, MediaLive is forming a corporate advisory board for Comdex that will include representatives from Microsoft, Oracle, Dell and other tech giants. Executives from those companies, who have already been approached by MediaLive and expressed an interest in participating on such a board, will help reshape Comdex to make it more relevant to IT decision-makers, he said.
MediaLive will face a number of challenges in rebuilding Comdex, including increasing competition from the CES, which continues to attract more of the gadget-focused computing companies that once made Comdex a mainstay. The organizers of CES recently announced that next year's show will expand to use the Las Vegas Convention Center and the Sands Convention Center, reviving the geographic sprawl that helped make the booming Comdex such a logistical challenge.
Much of the technology world's interest has shifted to specialty trade shows, such as the CTIA wireless shindig and Sun Microsystems' JavaOne programmer bash.
Woe is Comdex
We can't reminisce about those prehistoric Bill Gates keynotes, but CNET News.com has covered nearly a decade of Comdex events, and we've got the bunions to prove it. Here are some highlights:
1995
Internet fad hits Comdex
No porn, please, we're techies
Oracle tries thin-client computing
1996
Companies push NetPC plans
Intel jumps into graphics chips
Profiles in swag
Chili today, hot tamale
1997
Spending big on Comdex
Thin client confusion multiplies
Analysts dis trade show
Now with bouncers!
1998
Sizing up Comdex
Ellison needles Gates
Gimmicks galore
1999
Gadgets are taking over
The PC is dead, long live the PC
Linux gets attention
Les nuits du Comdex
2000
The no-bar blues
Ellison, Ballmer trade barbs
Playing at the Sands
Gadget drive gaining steam
2001
Drop that laptop!
Room to breathe
All the hits
2002
Waiting for good news
Printers and poker
Cheap rooms in empty hotels
Gadget wars
2003
Meet the new Comdex
IT still matters
Don't sit under the Apple tree
Comdex has mirrored the up-and-down fortunes of the computing industry for nearly 25 years. Casino owner Sheldon Adelson launched the Computer Dealers Exposition at the dawn of the PC era, with the first event in 1979 attracting about 150 exhibitors and 4,000 attendees, mostly mesmerized by new Apple Computer products. The show grew to 83,000 attendees in 1983, when Microsoft Chairman Gates delivered his first keynote speech, showing off the company's snazzy new DOS 2.0 operating system with a slide show that featured actual slides.
The show kept growing with the PC industry, hitting 210,000 attendees and taking over most of Las Vegas in 1995, when Adelson's Interface Group sold Comdex and a number of related trade shows to Japanese computer distributor and trade magazine publisher Softbank.
The good time kept rolling through the 1990s, with Comdex peaking in 1998, when it attracted 212,000 attendees and 2,480 exhibitors eating up 1.38 million square feet of exhibit space.
Comdex came under the purview of Key3Media, a new Softbank spin-off dedicated to running trade shows, in 1999. The bottom fell out two years later, when the sagging tech economy and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks combined to push attendance down to 125,000.
It's been downhill from there, for Comdex and Key3, which recast itself as privately held MediaLive when it emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last year.






After all, a lot of Comdex dovetailed nicely with the adult entertainment industry - consumer electronics that would allow folks to make/view/edit adult videos was shown "next door" to the actual end product.
Of course, this is all hearsay as I would *never* attend such an event...
And then there was the money. The mis-management of COMDEX noted that they did not make the money they thought they should, so they increased to fees charged. Did anyone else ntice the vast number of hotel suites rented by companies because it was so much cheaper than COMDEX floor rent.
Follow the money .....
CeBIT America EnterpriseIT is all about technology for the enterprise. Focus the event on the right audience, focus it on compelling technologies, and the marketplace will respond. We are open to talking to any one about our 2004 program (recently concluded), including you. Call us: 212-465-0531 or check it out on the web at www.cebit-america.com.
It sounds like the era of a show which tries to be all things to everyone in the tech field, is a thing of the past. There is too much information available over the internet, people have less time and money and they have specialized interests.
The narrow focus shows will continue on. CES, by focus on just consumer electronics is an example of this.
1. You'd see peeps who were definitely incompetent in their jobs continually get rehired after being let go, and paid higher salaries.
2. You'd see purchases of other smaller shows/companies being made, which would then in turn be torpedoed months later.
3. You'd see Fred blow the company out, K3M screw over all their creditors w. the bankruptcy, all of the management cronies whacked, then low and behold, new company, new ballgame? Unfortunately, same management, same sneaky practices.
4. Lies, lies, and more lies about attendance.
5. No focus from upper management about how to best serve attendees and exhibitors. It was all about the money, and no value whatsoever. Strategy seemed to be, rape the exhibitor for as much as you could get per squeet, jam as many attendees as you could in the halls, and hopefully the show would just "take care of itself".
6. Mistreatment of the hardworking, frontline staff that worked their tails off behind the scenes, for little pay, and little recognition for their efforts.
7. BPH rolling around in a new Benz & Escalade, laughing all the way to the bank.
8. Hey, at least Rich had some AWESOME weed!!! :p
Even in its heyday its return on investment was often questionable. I do recall a few deals that were closed with distribution and retailers, and some decent contacts made, but compared to the astronomical costs of space, lodging, per deims and other costs associated with getting a team on location, profitability was a rose colored dream.
For many companies it became more of a sales, marketing and IT reward program, a travel to sin city for a week of partying and other debauchery. Items from those days i am not so proud of include blowing 1000s of dollars in various "clubs" and late night liasons with more than one young and also married "marketing hottie". The idea of what goes on in vegas, stays in vegas may have not originated there, but it was alive and well.
Maturity brings perspective. Business may have matured too and outgrown this one.
- Sheldon Adelson
- by June 25, 2004 4:55 PM PDT
- While reading my Newsweek I see that Sheldon Adelson has his sites on Macao, a former Portugese colony in China which is set to become the new Eastern Las Vegas. Always ahead of the curve, I thought. Minutes later I hear COMDEX has been canceled. Although it was under his management during the years when exhibitors were becoming alienated with higher prices and when the show "floors" were virtually bursting at the seams, exhausting attendees, he knew when it was time to go. Practically broke when he started the company, he created and grew a concept that previously didn't exist. After deciding things had run their course, he sold the company for $2billion. It seems odd the present owners of the shows blame the demise of the brand on him. I believe he moved on and no one had the vision to fill his shoes.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)