June 11, 2007 4:57 AM PDT
OpenOffice worm Badbunny hops across operating systems
- Related Stories
-
Expert: IT industry has failed in desktop security
May 21, 2007 -
New OpenOffice version includes security upgrade
April 4, 2007 -
OpenOffice patches 'highly critical' flaw
January 5, 2007 -
Security from A to Z: Open source
November 27, 2006 -
OpenOffice security is questioned
August 14, 2006 -
OpenOffice patches three security holes
July 5, 2006 -
Stardust virus lands on OpenOffice
May 31, 2006 -
OpenOffice celebrates anniversary by squashing bug
October 13, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
OpenOffice password crack is open to abuse
April 24, 2007 -
French researchers find OpenOffice more vulnerable than Office
July 24, 2006
"A new worm is being distributed within malicious OpenOffice documents. The worm can infect Windows, Linux and Mac OS X systems," according to a Symantec Security Response advisory. "Be cautious when handling OpenOffice files from unknown sources."
Apple's Mac OS is not a virus-free platform, said Jan Hruska, who co-founded rival antivirus firm Sophos and was one of the first ever PC antivirus experts.
"Viruses on the Mac are here and now. They are available, and they are moving around. It is not as though the Mac is in some miraculous way a virus-free environment," Hruska said. "The number of viruses coming out for non-Mac platforms is higher. It gives a false impression that somehow, Apple Macs are all virus-free."
The worm was first spotted late last month, but at the time, it was not thought to be "in the wild."
Once opened, the OpenOffice file, called badbunny.odg, launches a macro that behaves in several different ways, depending on the user's operating system.
On Windows systems, it drops a file called drop.bad, which is moved to the system.ini file in the user's mIRC folder. It also executes the JavaScript virus badbunny.js, which replicates to other files in the folder.
On Apple Mac systems, the worm drops one of two Ruby script viruses in files respectively called badbunny.rb and badbunnya.rb.
On Linux systems, the worm drops both badbunny.py as an XChat script and badbunny.pl as a Perl virus.
Symantec rates the worm as a "medium risk."
Munir Kotadia of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.
See more CNET content tagged:
OpenOffice,
worm,
virus,
Symantec Corp.,
malicious software







On the other hand, if there are Mac OS X viruses in the wild, actually infecting computers , I wish Sophos, McAfee, Symantec, or someone would publish this information.
How am I supposed to tell all my Mac users to be careful when no one can site a single infection outside of the lab?
Come on guys, give me some help.
these anti virus companies are always finding new virus to protect
us from? Sure..., that's their job...., but they always seem to have
the right fix at the right moment. It's enough to make you
speculate who the root cause of these viruses are.
it's not a virus free OS..??? Funny, I thought this article was
suppose to be about a cross platform Open Office WORM, not an
OS X VIRUS..!!
What I'd like to know (and the article conveniently avoids) after
this worm drops a few files here and there just WHAT are these
so called "bad boys" suppose to be doing on the different
platforms..??? Since Symantec rates the worm at "medium risk"
I'm guessing short of giving the worm/virus (whatever it's
suppose to be) outright admins privilege on the Mac this thing
isn't going to do much (hence the convenient non-meantioning
of what it can or can't do on a Mac or Linux for that matter..).
I would be more impressed if it actually infected 1 machine.
This already makes the Perl 'virus' totally ineffective unless the user has administrative access (not common on Linux, our applications are designed properly) and actively searches out and gives this script execution privileges.
The python based X-Chat script can do more 'damage' since X-Chat will execute it directly. However it will still be limited by the standard defence mechanisms of the system and by X-Chat's own APIs.
The article fails to understand a basic fact about Linux. We don't believe it to be invulnerable. We know that viruses and other malware would be restricted by the standard defensive mechanisms of the system. No Linux system is a free for all like Windows, sane separation of privileges is the order of the day. This goes further with most corporate Linux solutions now defaulting to the use of strict mandatory access control defences like SELinux (which was designed by the NSA to be their standard form of security).
Also most Linux distributions will deactivate OOo macros by default.
It's impossible. They don't exist. OS X is invulnerable to viruses. That's why you don't need firewalls, anti-virus products, or any other sort of protection.
It's stupid to even consider there could be a virus that could affect a Mac.
There are many here in these forums that can give you page after page of rants about this very case.
(1) What happens when the worm drops off the package on OS X? On Windows, the description indicates that the worm drops off a package that acts like a virus. Please clarify as to the impact.
(2) Are we mixing up Worms, Virus, and Malware? Or Symantec is calling all Malware are also Virus? Please be careful on the reporting!
I mean, I really don't care. This is not a threat to me. I suspect it is much the same on with BSD based systems like Mac OSX as well. With OSS, any problem that actually does exist will have a fix within 12 hours. Microsoft only does that when their DRM gets cracked.
"OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 for eComStation and OS/2"
http://www.ecomstation.com/openoffice.phtml
Here's the link:
http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-052303-2513-99&tabid=1
My guess is that the number of infections is right around zero.
CNET does this kind of thing from time to time (as do their sister sites). I think it's because they just can't find anything else to publish - it's the same for all the tech media.
The article is more than a bit odd since it is titled and starts out about "badbunny" and then goes on about the supposed insecurity Apple's OS.
In a week or so, there won't be any article that doesn't mention the Apple iPhone
would any of us open it? Let's cut to the chase
here, and say what all this bragging is about.
Now, would any of us here open a document of
unknown provenance with an ability to run
potentially harmful macros? SERIOUSLY???
Also, if I were to open this file, I'd put in a
LiveCD of any distro of Linux (probably ubuntu,
since it has OpenOffice on its disk), and voila!
I can see exactly what the file does. Actually,
I might try that... just for fun. That way, no
harm done!
All this fanboyism that's going around really
hides the truth of the matter. On a forum, it's
better to talk about the news, not the flamewars
people are trying to start.
- NICE STORY HAH HAH
-
by mocefish
June 13, 2007 10:40 PM PDT
- SO BAD BUNNY IS HOPPING ALL OVER EVERYBODYS COMPUTER THAT WAS DUMB ENOUGH TO OPEN IT. WHAT MOST PEOPLE THAT LOKKED AT THIS STORY WANTED TO KNOW WAS WHAT DOES IT DO? MAYBE THE REPORTER FORGOT THIS PART OF THE STORY OR MOST OF THE REST OF THE POSTERS WERE JUST TO HAPPY TO JUMP ON A MS OR OSX BASH...
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 71 Comments >>