Version: 2008
  • On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart

March 23, 2006 4:56 PM PST

Online test calculates brain speed

  • 31 comments
As some researchers examine brain functions with advanced imaging technology, other scientists are measuring brain speed with the click of a mouse.

San Francisco-based Posit Science unveiled a program in recent weeks that tests how fast a person's brain can process information, based on his or her hearing speed.

"Auditory processing speed is important because much of the information we receive each day is communicated through sound--especially speech," according to Posit Science, which has developed software that promotes brain fitness. "The faster we can take in information accurately, the better we can keep up with, respond to and remember what we hear."

The 10-minute online test, at the company's Web site, measures how fast and accurately the test-taker can detect different sounds, by having the test-taker click on arrows. Once finished, the test-taker will receive a measurement of his or her brain speed, down to the millisecond.

In your 20s, the average speed of auditory processing is 68 milliseconds. That number jumps to an average of 87 milliseconds in your 40s and 106 milliseconds in your 60s.

Focus on brain research has been heightened in recent years with advances in technology that make it possible to determine everything from brain speed to emotional responses to Super Bowl ads. Posit Science, through its founder, neuroscientist and software entrepreneur Mike Merzenich, is concentrating on developing software programs that promote cognitive fitness and reverse the effects of aging.

Recent research findings show its brain fitness software, a computer-based training program, is having positive effects on elderly people. Seniors who participated in an eight-week training study with Posit Science showed improvement in neuron-cognitive function and memory, growing younger on average of auditory memory and attention by 10 years.

Still, the software to improve brain speed and memory isn't cheap. It costs about $500 for one PC. Or people can buy it bundled with a Dell Dimension 1100 computer for $1,000.

See more CNET content tagged:
brain, memory

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Bain Speed Test
by mstrhypno March 23, 2006 6:10 PM PST
Small problem with this test is the differencec is people who have trained fast-twitch muscle responses, versus those who have not trained them.

This test simply checks ear-hand response without taking into account any disabilities, limitations and, most importantly, because it is being done online, net lag-times.

In other words, as any kind of valid neuromuscular response test - it's worthless as it is online, even if there is a ping relational test built into the signal/response timer. Lag can and will still confound it when one is measuring in milliseconds. And that's to say nothing of the lag time in processing that a person's computer might have due to overhead computing in the background due to other tasks, spyware, etc.

This "test" conforms to the 90% section of Sturgeon's Law.

Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
Reply to this comment
Well, did you test this????
by Kaeles March 23, 2006 6:53 PM PST
I did.
The test doesn't check how fast you click the boxes, rather it tests how fast you can HEAR the changes and tell what the changes are.

To be sure, I left in the middle of the test, ate lunch, and came back, and got a better result than the first time.

So, I would suggest checking things out first.
That's what I thought at first too
by nhandler March 23, 2006 7:25 PM PST
I was clicking like a madman at first until I realized that it was checking whether you can differentiate between increasingly rapid bursts of escalating and descending pitches, not how fast you click the buttons.
did you even take the test? dumba$$
by baswwe March 24, 2006 12:06 PM PST
there is no hand/brain response time
100% wrong
by joecef March 28, 2006 10:36 PM PST
you really don't have the slightest idea of how this test actually functions otherwise you would have realized that the speed is referring to the sounds in the test not how fast you are able to click... moron
100% wrong
by joecef March 28, 2006 10:37 PM PST
you really don't have the slightest idea of how this test actually functions otherwise you would have realized that the speed is referring to the sounds in the test not how fast you are able to click... moron
What kind of brain speed does it take to spell?
by David McCarthy March 24, 2006 7:19 AM PST
If you access the site with a Mac, it says that the test is not
"compatiable" with Macintosh.
Reply to this comment
spell?
by a204801 March 24, 2006 9:25 AM PST
I dont see it? I have a Mac, I got to the page. Maybe they fixed it. I dont like the fact that they dont have a Mac version, but your attempt at trying to be funny is weak at best. Just sounds petty.
View reply
????
by yardbird420 March 24, 2006 10:32 AM PST
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard about or tried. What about comprehension... isn't that more important... up down down up... waht a silly meassure.
Reply to this comment
silly? you must of not got too far in the test..
by baswwe March 24, 2006 12:07 PM PST
I couldn't keep up..
????
by yardbird420 March 24, 2006 10:32 AM PST
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard about or tried. What about comprehension... isn't that more important... up down down up... what a silly meassure.
Reply to this comment
Post Scores here - 83 ms
by baswwe March 24, 2006 12:24 PM PST
83 ms, after lunch, tired, lots of my mind, age 32.


I'm going to retest in the morning, and then also retest another time with a good jolt of CAFFEINE.
Reply to this comment
59 ms , 2nd time, after coke Zero
by baswwe March 24, 2006 12:59 PM PST
practice or the caffeine?
28 ms
by kingskippus March 24, 2006 11:08 PM PST
I'm not bragging, that's the real result. My age's average score is 70, with top performers at 35. And it's 2:00am, and I haven't had caffeine. 8-]

So am I some sort of super-genius, or just a reeeealy lucky guesser?
View reply
25 ms second time though
by kingskippus March 24, 2006 11:17 PM PST
8-/ I'm starting to feel really good about myself...
34
by DynaWerx March 25, 2006 7:09 PM PST
No joke! :)
Reply to this comment
Oh yeah, I'm 38 years old
by DynaWerx March 25, 2006 7:10 PM PST
:)
29 milliseconds!
by slacker43210 March 25, 2006 8:46 PM PST
Score: 29 milliseconds
Age:27
Sex: Male
Occupation: Electronics Tech - Audio/Video Specialist
Time of test: 11:14pm 3-25-06 with headphones
Current "state of mind": 1 miller lite, 2 rum and cokes and 1 "special" cigarette.
Additional comments: I think it's a combination of my attention to sound frequencies as part of my occupation, in addition to my focus due to my current "state of mind". I will try again during other conditions to compare.
you must enter a title for your message
by quirK March 25, 2006 7:47 PM PST
Speed: 31 ms
Age: 21
Reply to this comment
Score 32 at age 36 after fifth of Jagermeister
by March 25, 2006 10:05 PM PST
I scored 32 and I am 36 as of January and have drank almost a 750 ml of Jagermeister before taking the test. Yes I am very computer literate. But I think the average score is way to high unless these peaple are just about brain dead.
Reply to this comment
41 at age 64
by motorgypsy March 26, 2006 7:11 AM PST
Should have done better! But not bad for a geezer!! I wonder if musicians do better on this test?? I would think so.
Reply to this comment
25, aged 29
by P-Null March 26, 2006 8:19 AM PST
I'm kinda surprised to have scored 25ms, right the first time I took this test. I don't know what this proves exactly, but I can tell you that it doesn't AT ALL mean that I have a memory to be envious of. I have to read books twice before they stick (same goes for movies), when people introduce themselves to me I immediately forget their names, and I get lost easily because I can't remember if I've been at a certain spot before.
The scientists are actually very reputable
by mgreere March 26, 2006 10:08 AM PST
Using the net to measure response time seems gimmicky, and the
actual benefit to real life may be questionable, but the guys who
did the research and software design are very highly respected and
know their stuff.
Reply to this comment
Essentially a copy of Fast Forword....
by Earl Benser March 26, 2006 11:20 AM PST
... a Scientific Learning product which has focused on improving
auditory signal processing for the last 10 years. The exercises
are almost exact copies of Fast Forword's exercises. Fast
Forward uses an internet connection to the home office to
evaluate progress and schedule the appropriate next set of
exercises after each session. The copy seems satisfied with
letting the CD program control the operations.

Can't get a whole lot excited over a 'me too' program, especially
when the original does it better.
Reply to this comment
What's the difference between Hooch and Good Scotch?
by spothannah March 27, 2006 7:03 AM PST
Time. Shoot from the hip, ask questions later. Sounds like a great idea (if you're an idiot.)
Reply to this comment
this is stupid
by davaal March 27, 2006 12:25 PM PST
this is stupid. why dont we all just take the Wonderlic?
Reply to this comment
lol
by everwanted2 April 7, 2008 9:53 PM PDT
I got 33. But I am 15, so I guess it is normal?
Reply to this comment
by Joackim88 May 23, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
I got a 15 at my best, i'm 19 years old... think it's pretty ok :P
Reply to this comment
(31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.11%) -11.94 10,572.02
S&P 500 (0.31%) 3.53 1,136.52
NASDAQ (0.01%) 0.29 2,308.71
CNET TECH (-0.02%) -0.31 1,671.91
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right