The number of United States households that swap music illegally online has dropped significantly since the Supreme Court's summer ruling against peer-to-peer software companies, research firm NPD Group said Wednesday.
However, the number of actual music files being traded has stayed high, indicating that the most active downloaders remain online, the research company said.
The drop of 11 percent--from June, when an estimated 6.4 million households downloaded at least one music file, to October, when 5.7 million households downloaded at least one file--seems to show that the entertainment industry's campaign against file swapping is gaining momentum, said NPD Group analyst Russ Crupnick.
"This is the first time that we've seen this kind of significant drop that's definitely not related to seasonality," Crupnick said.
Entertainment companies have closely watched estimates of file-swapping behavior for years, hoping that a combination of lawsuits, education and court battles would ultimately decrease the numbers of people trading music and movies online.
Despite headline-grabbing lawsuits against individuals, the effects on file-swapping behavior often have been hard to see.
The months after the Recording Industry Association of America first said it would start suing individuals did see a substantial drop in music downloading through networks such as Kazaa and eDonkey. But the numbers had crept up consistently since then--until the Supreme Court's ruling in June.
Now it appears that many casual swappers have turned to other means of downloading music. The number of music files that are still being traded, however, has remained fairly flat, and actually increased slightly, from an estimated 258 million in June to 266 million in October.
"This is not atypical consumer behavior," Crupnick said. "There will always be some really committed users regardless of whether supply is cut or demand is impacted."
I dont know what these old people are smoking but im the only person i know that actually likes to buy CD and doesnt have a single illegal song. Im happy with listening to others music via iTunes.
Everyone else shares. They just do it by different means now. No one is stupid enough to use napster or other sites that are watched over like vultures picking on broke kids.
They say it's because of threats and the heavy-handed RIAA! Sorry, it's not. It's because we've been given a viable alternative in Napster, iTunes and the like. Now we can compile albums of music we actually want rather than deal with the greedy-ass record companies spoon-feeding us the garbage they're putting out. "Here's two good songs and eight crappy fillers!"
Sorry, RIAA, you'd like to think you scare the people, but you don't.
Now it appears that many casual swappers have turned to other means of downloading music. The number of music files that are still being traded, however, has remained fairly flat, and actually increased slightly, from an estimated 258 million in June to 266 million in October. "This is not atypical consumer behavior," Crupnick said. "There will always be some really committed users regardless of whether supply is cut or demand is impacted."
It sounds like an admission that the bulk of the downloading is done by a few individuals. Which if you think about it goes a long way to debunking the industry claims that P2P was killing their business and all those downloads represented lost sales. If most people downloaded a few tunes, the industry wasn't losing much from them and if the few people that download many tunes were cut off completely, does anyone really believe that they would buy all those tunes, or that they purchased them prior to being able to download them for free?
The two telecom carriers will carry a next-generation iPad running on the fast, next-generation wireless technology, sources tell The Wall Street Journal.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
Hamza Kashgari's tweets of an imaginary conversation with the Prophet Mohammad are viewed as blasphemous by the Saudi Arabian government. Now he faces trial with a possible death sentence.
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
person i know that actually likes to buy CD and doesnt have a
single illegal song. Im happy with listening to others music via
iTunes.
Everyone else shares. They just do it by different means now. No
one is stupid enough to use napster or other sites that are watched
over like vultures picking on broke kids.
Sorry, RIAA, you'd like to think you scare the people, but you don't.
"This is not atypical consumer behavior," Crupnick said. "There will always be some really committed users regardless of whether supply is cut or demand is impacted."
It sounds like an admission that the bulk of the downloading is done by a few individuals.
Which if you think about it goes a long way to debunking the industry claims that P2P was killing their business and all those downloads represented lost sales.
If most people downloaded a few tunes, the industry wasn't losing much from them and if the few people that download many tunes were cut off completely, does anyone really believe that they would buy all those tunes, or that they purchased them prior to being able to download them for free?