- Related Stories
-
Google's chastity belt too tight
April 23, 2004 -
Google faces trademark suit over keyword ads
January 28, 2004 -
Google cache raises copyright concerns
July 9, 2003
Perfect 10 alleges search giant lets people view hijacked versions of its photos and gives access to stolen passwords.
The story "Nude-photo publisher sues Google" published November 23, 2004 at 11:43 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.






Women"'?!? What does that have to do with anything.
I bet Reuters just picked up the perfect 10 press release without
even touching it and then the good folks at CNET just passed it
on to us. Journalism...
OTOH, ignorance of this is convenient when free publicity is needed.
Women"'?!? What does that have to do with anything.
I bet Reuters just picked up the perfect 10 press release without
even touching it and then the good folks at CNET just passed it
on to us. Journalism...
OTOH, ignorance of this is convenient when free publicity is needed.
Perhaps they should opt out of having their trademarks and the like featuring in Google searches, thereby eliminating all the problems the have perceived.
Oooooops! That wouldn't be such a good idea as this would reduce the possible traffic through their site.
Civil litigation - proof you can "eat your cake AND have it".
Perhaps they should opt out of having their trademarks and the like featuring in Google searches, thereby eliminating all the problems the have perceived.
Oooooops! That wouldn't be such a good idea as this would reduce the possible traffic through their site.
Civil litigation - proof you can "eat your cake AND have it".
Google has no control over the content that people put on their websites. If someone chooses to give away their username and password publicly on a website, then Google has done nothing wrong. Solution: Google has actually helped to identify the wrongdoers releasing this information and the porn site can revoke the access for those users and sue them (it must fall under a breach of contract or something like that).
Google's job is to follow the hyperlinks it finds, prioritise the content for relevance as best it can and serve it up to those that request it. Perfect10 is just out to get free publicity at Google's expense and because it's too expensive to go after the real culprits. If I were Google, I'd say have it your way then and pull everything related to Perfect10 out of the index. Lets see how long they last without Google to drive customers to their site.
Google has no control over the content that people put on their websites. If someone chooses to give away their username and password publicly on a website, then Google has done nothing wrong. Solution: Google has actually helped to identify the wrongdoers releasing this information and the porn site can revoke the access for those users and sue them (it must fall under a breach of contract or something like that).
Google's job is to follow the hyperlinks it finds, prioritise the content for relevance as best it can and serve it up to those that request it. Perfect10 is just out to get free publicity at Google's expense and because it's too expensive to go after the real culprits. If I were Google, I'd say have it your way then and pull everything related to Perfect10 out of the index. Lets see how long they last without Google to drive customers to their site.
- Lawyers must love these guys
- by December 2, 2004 12:33 PM PST
- They just want money any way they can get it. The world is full of people who completely make up lawsuits. Did anyone else notice the part where it talked about perfect10's suit against financial institutions (Visa, MC, etc.) because they profit from the sale of pirated material?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)