By Stefanie Olsen
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: January 25, 2007 4:30 PM PST
The modern wired family is seeing a few mainstays going the way of the dinosaur: landlines, printed dictionaries, maps, newspapers and, of course, the need to remember phone numbers or learn to spell.
That's according to a broad new national study, called "The Digital Family," released this week by the No. 1 cable network Nickelodeon. The findings are among the first examinations of technology usage in the home, and they're part of a wider effort among U.S. researchers to understand how rapidly advancing technology is changing the family structure, as well as the way kids communicate and are educated and entertained.
Nickelodeon, which is owned by MTV Networks, said it conducted extensive research from September 2006 to December 2006, questioning parents of children from infants to 14-year-olds, as well as kids ages 6 to 14 about their usage of television, digital video recorders, video on demand, the Net, cell phones, video games and MP3 players. Research included focus groups, telephone interviews, interviews of pairs of friends and deprivation studies (questioning parents and kids who gave up TV, the Internet and so on). Data from Nielsen Media Research was also incorporated.
Presumably, one key finding for Nickelodeon was that popular new technologies like the Internet are not eating into television's influence. The amount of time parents and kids spend watching TV has risen by about two hours weekly since Nickelodeon's study in 2002. According to Marsha Williams, senior vice president for research and planning in Nickelodeon's Kids and Family Group, that reflects TV's role as a relaxation tool, family-bonding device and babysitter.
"The Internet has blurred the lines between work and home. It's hard to turn off," said Williams, presenting her research to Hollywood and media executives in Los Angeles on Thursday. So Nickelodeon found in its deprivation study of parents and kids that they missed television most, over the Internet, cell phones or other technology. "They really missed the ability to kick back, unwind and relax your brain."
Despite this, today's family relies heavily on technologies like the Internet and cell phones to function. Roughly 98 percent of parents go online once a week, spending an average of 33.5 hours online a month. In contrast, 71 percent of kids go online once a week and spend an average of 19 hours and 20 minutes on the Web monthly, the study found. Still, adoption of high-speed Internet in the home is growing faster than adoption of any other technology--a fact Williams said is changing habits quickly.
For example, deprived of the Internet for 10 days, many parents and kids found that being online is more essential than they thought previously to accessing information, doing schoolwork or staying in touch with friends.
"Moms who gave up the Internet were very annoyed," Williams said, adding that one mom was exasperated by having to visit an office to put money on a highway toll card. "It was barbaric to her." Another child had to take a trip to the library to finish a report on China.
As a result, technology is driving a shift in behaviors at home. The study showed that, thanks to the Internet, a quarter of parents believe it's no longer necessary to spell well, reference printed dictionaries, or read the newspaper. Kids ages 8 to 14 agreed in slightly lesser percentages (an average of one-fifth) about the usefulness of spelling well, dictionaries and newspapers, except when it came to printed maps. About 20 percent of parents, versus 21 percent of kids, said they no longer need to know how to read a geographic map.
Still, to evaluate the accuracy of information on the Internet in the form of blogs, kids must learn critical thinking skills, she said.
And while TV and the Net are holding court, many other habits and technologies are losing out in the modern family.
The cell phone effect
Because of cell phones, almost half of all kids and parents say they don't need to remember phone numbers anymore. More than a third say the landline isn't needed. And a quarter of kids (and 16 percent of parents) say the spontaneity of mobile phones means it's not important to plan ahead (89 percent of parents own a cell phone versus 27 percent of kids ages 8 to 11 and 61 percent of kids ages 12 to 14.)
Because of MP3 players, a third of kids say it's no longer necessary to make casual conversation with others or listen to the radio. More than half of parents, and 45 percent of kids, say they don't need to buy CDs or albums.
The research also shows that the adoption of tech in the home is both top down and bottom up--from kids to parents and vice versa. Parents are just as likely as their kids, if not more so, to embrace cell phones, MP3 players and the Net. Unlike the previous generation of parents, who turned to their kids to program the VCR, today's parents are just as likely to work the DVR as kids are. In a surprising finding, more parents (68 percent) use game consoles, compared with 58 percent of 8- to 14-year-olds. That's likely because parents are using game consoles to bond with their kids, according to Williams.
For parents, the cell phone is all-important for keeping tabs on kids and therefore was commonly described as an "electronic leash." Nearly half of parents surveyed said they wanted to get their child a cell phone, so their kid was accessible at all times. The common rule among parents is: "no matter when or where I call, you answer the phone or you lose it," according to Williams.
Other observations in the study included:
Williams called the family unit today the smartest generation of consumers ever, given that parents and kids actively seek information about prospective products on the Net. And because of the Internet, parents regularly get their kids input on shopping decisions. According to the study, 81 percent of parents say their kids know as much or more about sit down restaurants in their area, for example.
Because technology creates an "always on" environment, parents have a much higher premium on downtime. In Nickelodeon's deprivation study of parents and kids who did not have access to any "screen" for 10 days, what they cited as missing most was television and the it's pure escapism, according to one participant.
Williams said that just because convergence is possible, it doesn't mean it's practical for digital families. The merger of cell phones and MP3 players, for example, isn't compatible with how parents and kids use the individual devices, Williams said. One is used for checking in and the other is for tuning out.
Send insights or tips on this topic to stefanie.olsen@cnet.com.
Stefanie Olsen covers science and technology for CNET News.com. In this series, she examines the young generation's unique immersion in the Web, cell phones, IM and online communities.
Sit with children when they're online to ensure they visit only parent-approved Web sites. The American Library Association lists great sites for kids on its Web site.
Use child-friendly search engines or one with parental controls. KidsClick, for example, is a Web search site by librarians.
Establish a family e-mail account.
Talk to children about their online activities and online friends. To kids, the Internet is an extension of the real world.
Establish rules for the Internet. Studies from Canada's Media Awareness group have shown that children respond positively to established rules.
Kids' TV faces new Net restrictions
A new crop of kids: Generation We
The mating dance of the 'techno-sexual'
Disney invites stars onto CES stage
Study: Americans feel strongly about social ties online, too
Cracking the code of teens' IM slang
Virtual parenting poised for growth spurt
Parents shaky about kids' safety online
Teen-only gym: Virtual reality, real sweat
MySpace blurs line between friends and flacks
MySpace reaching out to parents
Are virtual worlds the future of the classroom?
School filters vs. home proxies
When digital kids rule the classroom
Teaching kids to drive the Net
E-bullying on rise, say experts
Kids: high-tech's fussy new customers
NASA launches educational Web site
MIT's Negroponte dismisses laptop criticism
Let Goofy track your children
Windows Live parental controls due this summer
New tech aims to get kids off the couch
Do Web filters protect your child?
First off parents are often incompetent and woefully inadequate in the ability to guide a childs education nevermind decide what is important. Many parents can't even do their childrens elementary school work. Should these people be making any decisions with regards to what their children should be learning? I thought not.
Let me ask you this... ever asked a child with poor spelling to do a google search or type a url into the address bar? Yeah its like watching a person with concrete feet swim.
Would you want this person programming your OS (maybe they already do :P), or perhaps writing a prescription for you?
Spelling is not a useless skill anyways. It helps one decipher new words and is linked strongly to functional literacy.
Map skills? Ever asked a kid to negotiate to places they've never been before? Map skills are vital to a good sense of direction and guess what gps fan boys... power and batteries run out.
I'm not saying some good old skills dont become antiquated... like algorithms to calculate roots for example, but a worthwhile education requires a strong foundation and the same people who say spelling is a dinosaur probably wonder why their kid is bad at math (no its not that hes dumb... its that he hasn't memorized his arithmatic tables.)
Hiya!
If the kids do not have the basic skills, how would they differentiate the above polar opposites? Rely on others to spoon-feed them on the answers? Reminds me of "1984".
We will then become the slaves of technology that others created...
--GIF
The way we spell things may warp and adapt based on the new words created by technology,
but as long as we have search engines we will need spelling.
and as long as people have friends they will need to know how to talk to them!
I remember I flunked typing, (on a manual typewriter, no less), in
eighth grade. I could see absolutely no applicability to real life.
My parents didn't fight it. Now, I couldn't function without
excellent typing skills.
So, how do we know what skills adn knowledge will be necessary
in the future?
The other thing that really amazes me is kids doing research on
the Internet. In the "good old days," Encyclopedia Britannica had
a reputation to uphold, so they spent a lot of time making sure
that their facts were right. The other day, I saw a front page
newspaper story that quoted Wikipedia as it's primary source. I
wanted to go to the editor and ask him if he realized that anyone
can post anything they want to post on Wikipedia. It's not
necessarily accurate, yet the editor let his reporter treat it as his
primary source. Whenever I see websites quoted as primary
and/or the only source, I cringe. Just because it is easy, doesn't
mean it is right...
Most editors are stuffy conservatives(which may be why papers are losing to the Internet) and I cant imagine an editor allowing a reporter to use only an Internet source for their article.
coz u may miss
The Rise of the New Illiterati
whose heads is rapt in illumin-num
oo erupt as one
no thwarts goes in, no thwarts goes out
megaflops notwithstandin
a finger pulls a trigger
a bird flies into a mirror
... or because more adults can AFFORD an expensive console. Its a myth that gaming is for kids... its for everyone.
Then, (at least) a quarter of parents are idiots and their children are likely to suffer because of it.
The basic skills of reading, writing, and, general math are as important today as ever before.
Those that fail to learn the basics are likely to be the ones handing you fries and a burger the next time you are in the drive through lane.
Spelling and arithmetic still have some value, however, new skills are becoming more valuable. Less teaching time should be devoted to things a computer can do for you, and more should be spent on more advanced skills.
One problem I see is that most teachers do not have the skills themselves that students will need in the next decades. Less spelling and arithmetic, more composition and math.
You dont need spelling to work at Wal-Mart. You certainly dont need expensive, advanced "edukayshun".
That?s right, they can consume but have no clue how to produce!
That?s right, they can consume but have no clue how to produce!
Therefore the study is extremely FLAWED!
However, even at that, there is absolutely no such thing as a substitute for the axiom which includes "good 'old-fashioned' reading, writing and arithmatic". Without a fundimental understanding of the rudimentary basics, how can one understand or even correctly use current or future technology to it's fullest?
I agree with the poster that stated that this "study" proved that 25% of parents are IDIOTS!
"U won fryz wi dat?" Indeed!
"U won fryz wi dat?" Indeed!
But remember - it is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.
I would argue that mathematics on paper isn't as important as it once was. As technology becomes more pervasive, we should be able to embrace it and utilize it.
What's missing, though, is education that focuses on *why* math works. So even if you use a calculator to figure it out, you understand what you're putting in, roughly what you should expect to get when you hit the equal key and why. So that in crunch time, you can use pencil and paper, or at least make a reasonable estimate that will hold until you have access to the calculator.
But this has been something that's been overlooked since the beginning of time... teaching children how to think and reason and deduce. We're too busy teaching them how to do long division without teaching them how to analyze, correlate, deduct, summarize, hypothesize, debate, research, formulate and on and on and on.
But the fact that so many parents don't place a value on such skills might be telling of an educational system that was broken long before now.
right, and his daughter seems to have figured it out too (if a
little late). It would seem that a sense of entitlement to all the
toys and perks that technology offers is fairly prevalent these
days, and in younger and younger kids. My wife is a teacher,
and she finds it interesting that some kids can't write a simple
sentence, but are incredibly competent on x-box, ps2,
gamecube etc. Part of this is because many of their parents
were the leading edge of the present wave of "self absorbed"
types who feel that they shouldn't have to let mundane
employment get in the way of the important things in life. The
really scary thing is contemplating the kind of society we will
have in ten years. It only took twenty for pc's and cell phones to
put us at the lofty heights of enlightenment we now enjoy...
"Dude! I gotta call ya later, I just ran over a pedestrian (guy
walking).lol.
Map reading also matters. Sorry, but sometimes MapQuest is wrong, and it's easier to read a picture on a map than it is to remember a sequence of verbal directions.
This may be a sensational headline, but all it really does is show that people are getting more and more stupid. Just because they may think that these skills are not important does not mean that they aren't.