- Related Stories
-
Net neutrality fans lose on Capitol Hill
March 27, 2006 -
Silicon money
March 27, 2006 -
Telecoms look to the future
March 22, 2006 -
AT&T chief, FCC chair clarify on Net neutrality
March 21, 2006 -
Net video explosion triggers traffic jam worries
February 23, 2006 -
Politicos divided on need for 'Net neutrality' mandate
February 7, 2006 -
Without 'Net neutrality,' will consumers pay twice?
February 7, 2006 -
Playing favorites on the Net?
December 21, 2005
In a letter to Congress on Tuesday, the companies told Rep. Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, that his bill to revamp telecommunications laws "would fail to protect the Internet." Barton is the chairman of the House of Representatives' Energy and Commerce Committee.
Instead of bowing to requests from Internet businesses, Barton sided with one of Washington's most potent lobbying forces: telecommunications companies, including DSL (digital subscriber line) and cable providers, that spread around far more money in political circles.
A CNET News.com report published this week shows that the Internet industry is being outspent in Washington by more than a 3-to-1 margin.
AT&T, Comcast, Time Warner and Verizon Communications spent $230.9 million on politicians from 1998 until the present, while the three Internet companies plus Amazon.com and eBay spent only a combined $71.2 million. (Those figures include lobbying expenditures, individual contributions, political action committees and soft money.)
Network neutrality is the idea that the companies that own the broadband pipes may not be able to configure their networks in a way that plays favorites--allowing them, for example, to transmit their own services at faster speeds, or to charge Net content and application companies a fee for similar fast delivery.
Internet companies, Skype and liberal advocacy groups have been pressing Congress for strict laws requiring Net neutrality, and had been hoping that Barton's Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act would mandate it. Instead, Barton sided--not entirely, but enough to inspire Tuesday's letter--with broadband providers.
"This bill would allow for such a fundamental change in the paradigm of the Internet that it would frustrate the reasonable expectations of the tens of millions of Americans who go online," the letter to Barton says.
See more CNET content tagged:
Internet company,
broadband,
Net Neutrality,
eBay Inc.,
telecommunications




tax dollars. I have hundreds of thousands of dollars in
infrastructure that I paid for. The government has not given me
a dime to build what I have built for our customers, and for
people to just assume that they own what has been paid for by
private companies is wrong.
Neutrality is great, but it must be on all sides, not just the little
guys underneath the big boys. If you want a level playing field,
make it level, not more uneven than it already is.
However, I do disagree with this. I can see allowing them to make their services faster (such as accessing Cox websites from a Cox cable modem acct) but all other sites/services should have equal status.
Here Here! I totally agree, the entire infrastructure was created from tax dollars.
If this plan goes thru in this form or at all, the previous posts are correct. The entire functionality and structure dependent form of the "Internet" will be harmfully changed. We must not allow this to occur, we must insist our elected representatives ensure that no private co/corp' be allowed to "own" &/or "exercise control over" this communications infrastructure, we call the internet. Even our nations security depends upon it.
EdGirard
- Politicians for sale
-
by Michael Grogan
March 29, 2006 1:59 PM PST
- More important than the effects of this legislation is the fact that it went in favor of the companies who gave more money to the politicians. The sell outs become more blatant all the time.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)