- Related Stories
-
H-1Bs not going like hotcakes
May 24, 2005 -
H-1Bs now open to the less-educated?
March 10, 2005 -
Bill adds 20,000 H-1B visas
November 22, 2004 -
H-1B visa limit for 2005 already reached
October 1, 2004 -
Group wants H-1B visa exemptions
May 5, 2004
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Tuesday said that as of June 29, it had received 8,069 petitions for the additional guest worker visas, which are reserved for skilled foreign workers with an advanced degree from a U.S. institution.
The 20,000 visas were approved by Congress after this year's annual cap of 65,000 visas was reached as of the very first day of the federal fiscal year, Oct. 1, 2004.
H-1B visas, which allow computer programmers and other skilled foreigners to work in the United States for up to six years, have been the subject of fierce debate in the tech industry. More than 600,000 new visas have been granted since 2000, many of them to foreign tech workers; in 2003, for example, 39 percent of H-1B visas approved were for workers in computer-related occupations.
Critics say the H-1B program fuels the shift of skilled-labor positions offshore, is ripe for abuse and undermines U.S. wages.
Industry leaders argue that H-1Bs serve instead as a brake on offshoring. They also defend the visas as a means to ease skilled-labor shortages and give U.S. companies access to international talent as they compete globally.
Slack demand for the controversial visas is somewhat puzzling. Businesses had called for an exemption along the lines of the one Congress passed.
Tepid interest in the 20,000 extra visas this year could signal that tech employers either are filling their openings with U.S. workers or limiting their U.S. hiring overall--possibly thanks to a shift of work overseas.
There was some confusion about how USCIS would allocate the new 20,000 visas. But the agency clarified its position in May, which is also when it began accepting applications for the additional visas.
On May 24, the agency said it had received petitions for 6,400 of the 20,000 new visas.
An extra 20,000 visas earmarked for workers with advanced degrees from U.S. institutions also will be available in future years under the new law. The H-1B program also provides exemptions to the annual cap for institutions of higher education, nonprofit research organizations and governmental research organizations.
See more CNET content tagged:
H-1B,
institution,
hiring,
worker,
agency




Then, when there is a good position available that somebody could make some money at and support their family with the income, companies go out and hire foreigners to do the job on the cheap.
What do you get from that? You get the same outcome or worse. There are no statistics that show that foreigners do better work. They just do it for less money.
Shoot, go down to your local Wendy's and look at who is working the counter. My daughter can't even get a lousy job at a fast food restaurant, because illegal aliens have taken all the jobs.
The line about "Illegal aliens do the work that we won't." is a false statement They are now taking all of the jobs.
Down with H1B Visas!
The fact: There aren't enough qualified American workers for the IT openings. Just go to a college nearby and look at the American/foreigners ratio in the computer science/engineering departments (don't even need to mention graduate schools).
I went to the UT Austin campus to recruit the smartest techies - summer jobs included.
The average American graduate asked me for a salary that was 30% higher than what I was drawing from my company. Computer Science grads are not made in heaven and I took the next step - outsourced my work to consultants who work hard, smart and deliver, and don't need 100K jobs right out of college.
America is working to compete with a global economy, and I just cannot afford to sell a solution that is 30 times more expensive than the UK or Europe. I am seriously thinking of moving my company base out to Canada so as to create products that can compete globally.
It will be unfortunate, but unavoidable.
I see ignorance all over - see Wal-mart - they can compete because they buy the cheapest goods from all over the world, practically shutting down small American manufacturers, 65% of the people answering on this forum drive Japanese Brand cars.
Today a lot of the largest companies' revenues come from outside the US, for example Microsoft, Oracle, Yahoo are International companies, including Intel and have an onbligation to the International community to HIRE PEOPLE!!!
And yes, the people are cheaper, because I think everyone can live on $65,000 a year and not have 2 mortgages and 50K in debt in credit cards.
Wake up!!!!
Don't blame the H1-B because of your misfortune.
The problem, as far as I have heard, with H1B's is not when the come to the U.S. and compete with us directly, but when they come over to train, and then go back to India or wherever where they can do the same work, but cheaper.
But I have been part of two design teams that were performing quite well with a limited size and budget, but which were shut down to fund an emergent site in India. They sent a bunch of H1B's back to India to form a core team, and then built a team from scratch to take on the new project there. And when they struggle, U.S. resources are piled on to help them until they succeed, so that the Indian site can claim victory and then they can start performing attrition on the U.S. sites. Is this about the best and brightest?
No, it's about cost. And the cost differential, the difference in cost of living, is all related to the concentration of poverty and of little pieces of paper. Wouldn't you be pissed if you studied for 6 years and worked for several more to be good at what you do, and you never know when it is going away because of some cost gold-rush?
And then when you look around, you see it happenning everywhere. Don't you know the infrastructure of the U.S. is what will provide the launching pad for tomorrow's innovation, and if we let it slip away, the raw resources for success won't be there. Other countries have had brilliant people beside the U.S. for millennia? Where do you tihnk our technological lead came from? It came from investing in our future, which is what globalization is poised to take away from us. I cna't imagine how anyone with half a brain could think that's a good thing.
I've worked with several guest workers and they make well below that of American citizens. One woman from Colombia had 6 years experience as a DBA and she made 40K, without benefits, often working over 40 hours. An American would have made at least double that.
Guest worker visas were intended to bring in exceptional people (like Verener von Braun, who was the mastermind of our space program during the Cold War) or when there was a physical shortage, not a shortage at a given wage. When people like Gates talk about a shortage, what they really mean is that there is a shortage of Americans willing to work 60 hour weeks for 35 or 40K, without benefits.
The reason that the 20K additional work visas have not been quickly snapped up is that now they require guest workers to have a Master's Degree. Jobs for Americans are still diminishing.
H1 transfers to another company are nowadays very easy and are done quite often.
Employers obviously don't like to tell that to their employees, and the H1 employees, not familiar with the rules of the land, often don't know.
So, instead of ******** here, why don't you tell the people you know about this?
All of the following is from research done by Dr. Norm Matloff. If you disagree, you will have to argue with Dr. Matloff. And I warn you if you disagree, it will be like trying to knock down Mt. Everest with a wooden hammer if you try to challenge Dr. Matloff. He has spent the past several years extensively researching the subject. His research is FACT, not opinion.
http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/Summary.pdf
http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/Mich.pdf
FACT: H-1B holders are paid much less than Americans. A UCLA study shows a 33% pay gap. A UC Davis study reports a 15-20% pay gap.
FACT: H-1B holders are "de facto" indentured servants. "Immigrants Support Network" and an NRC report confirms this.
FACT: H-1B visa holders are NOT the "best and the brightest".
FACT: Requirement to pay "prevailing wages" and hire only a H-1B visa when "Americans cannot be found" are not requirements after all. Employers can easily get away with circumventing the so-called "rules".
FACT: Using H-1B visas prevents offshoring. From the research:
"A report commissioned by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), a major industry lobbying group, found that only 104,000 American IT jobs were lost during 2000-2003 due to offshoring. By contrast, as of 2002, there were 463,000 H-1Bs (not including tens of thousands of L-1s) holding IT jobs in the U.S.39 Clearly, at least up to now, H-1B/L-1 has been a much larger problem than offshoring.
? Crucial point: Most offshoring software projects include a key ?onshore,? i.e. U.S., component,
staffed by H-1Bs/L-1s. Typically H-1Bs/L-1 comprise 20% or more of the project. So, even the
offshoring issue is an H-1B/L-1 issue; offshoring depends on the H-1B and L-1 programs for its
sccess.
? The savings accruing from offshoring are not nearly as large as perceived, and in fact are commensurate with the savings obtained by importing the H-1Bs and L-1 to work in the U.S. Though programmer salaries in India are very low, even advocates of offshoring estimate the overall cost savings for offshoring to be in the range of 15 to 40 percent.42 This is about the same range of savings accrued for work done in the U.S. by hiring H-1Bs.
Therefore, in conclusion, the H-1B visa is NOT needed, and certainly increases in the cap are NOT needed. America would do itself much good to get rid of the H-1B visa and/or greatly reduce the cap.
See the following web site and join the newsletter for more up-to-date information about the H-1B visa scam:
http://www.zazona.com
FACT: Using H-1B visas prevents offshoring.
It should read:
FACT: Using H-1B visas does NOT prevent offshoring.
So, go blame those rich guys up top, don't blame the H1-Bs. They have been doing their job and have done nothing wrong. Anyway, they'll become US citizens sooner or later. US is an immigration country afterall, don't forget the history.
Just becoz he is settled now doesn't mean he don't want others?
Please donate and fill his account with dollars.
Good.
He has admitted to me personally that all his "data"
is anecdotal. It is therefore completely unusable for any kind of "study." He does anti-immigrant politics, nothing else.
I just have no desire to go back to
the US given the political climate.
Maybe after 2008, if you know what
I mean. At least after that silly
war is over. I liked it in the US,
but I didn't feel like I belonged
there. Death penalty, abortion
rights being threatened, too much
religion/talk of God.
I'm paid much less in Europe, and
I pay higher taxes. Yet the cost
of living is such (lower) that I
live better in Europe (maybe because
H1-Bs are paid less than citizens,
as was mentioned). So why look for
a job in CA where housing costs are
still insane or NY or OR where there
aren't many jobs. These are the only
states I'd consider living in.
H1-Bs are not the best and brightest,
just like US citizens with similar
degrees aren't. They're just hard
workers who don't give up, which
some copanies like to hire. Doesn't
mean at all that they're smart.
You're so right. I wonder what I am doing here in CA
where it's all about money and show it. What about the
millions of Americans who have to cram into a house to
just get by?
I am French and I feel like every day, I want to be part of
Europe, a concept that the government here does not
even respect.
Veronique (you know me!)
People with Master's Degrees or higher cost more than those with Bachelors.
It proves that the sole purpose of the H-1B program is to hire cheap labor. It isn't about capability.
Believe me it never has been.
Employers are waiting for the 65k bachelor degree H-1b's to come back, when they can save 20k/year salary on foreign workers.
1) Most companies are not aware of the exact date when the 20,000 extra visas become available. My friend who is interviewing with high-profile companies for a non-tech, masters level job was told by many stupid HR people that they do not want to risk hiring him when the quota is so small.
2) In part because of the above fact, companies still refuse to even review resumes of Masters students if they do not have the adequate work authorization. It is understandable to a point because previously companies would go through a lot of work to hire and attempt to sponsor a student only to be told that the quota was filled by lower-wage direct-hires from abroad. I am from a highly ranked university and even the best companies that do come to campus interview Master's students and take them through several rounds but drop them like a hot potato when they realize they are on a student visa.
In a sense this 20,000 visa increase is a boon for international masters students because it will allow them to apply their higher skills and be paid accordingly, while not competing with lesser-skilled people for the quota.
And Drake, could you please explain your point keeping in mind the higher number of international students in highly skilled masters programs right from food sciences to technology ?
People on H1 have to be paid the same as US workers. There is no "cheap labor." These are professionals who know what they are worth and who get paid competitive wages. "Cheap labor" is a myth.
As for the other points being pointed out so strongly about H1-Bs I would say that most of the arguments on both sides are correct. It depends on which "H1-Bs" you interacted with. One side of H1-Bs are the companies that do hire people who are "good" and these people are paid whatever salaries they demand. The other side is the body-shopping(mainly Indian contracting companies) that bring H1-Bs in bulk to do routine programming jobs and undercut the price.
As for being "bonded laborers" that applies to any H1-B who applies for a green card. It is not the H1-B which is causing them to work at the employer's whims. It is the rules(you have to start GC again if you shift employers) and the time(about 4 years for approval) it takes to get the green card that makes them stick to the same employer and in effect be indentured.
The other thing I wanted to point out is that there are lot of jobs which are very routine and mundane and these jobs are going to go away (either offshore or to contract H1-B companies). So ask yourself if your job is one of them. You can answer it best.
Also, a lot of people who have done Masters in Comp Sci end up doing programming jobs(like writing JSPs etc) for which you dont really need a MS. Only those MS students who can contribute technologically to the company will survive. This is true in general for anybody. If you have something significant to contribute whether technologically or customer facing or whatver, you dont need to worry about job loss. If your job is mundane and routine then be prepared to say adios
Other than that, you made a pretty well considered post.
But u may have a point there... if the bachelors are cheaper than Masters and if they are doing the same work better (maybe becoz of experience) why do they have to go to Masters?
I beleive masters should be used for speciality Tech jobs (maybe what google, MS are doing) since they have the research knowledge. And how many jobs do u think are there out there?
If they really need masters they take masters... I saw some jobs that specifically said that ONLY Masters can apply and again 80% say only Green card - so it will never be the international masters student :)
I don't see us needing programmers at all after 10 years. Atleast not the JSP/ASP lot.
The US has always been ahead in the Tech curve. What we're seeing here right now, they (India & China) will see in a few years time.
I'm sure that most of the Tech meltdown was caused by technology itself. UnAttended Installs, Automatic Windows Updates, Object and WebService reuse, easily downloadable Open Source software libraries or even Sample Source found using Google, have all contributed heavily to ever increasing productivity.
What took a team of 7 to build or maintain, a few years ago, can now be built or maintained by 2. Very soon even those 2 won't be needed.
Lets all look ahead without fear and stop blaming one another. We're all in the same boat but we're a smart bunch.
- Information Technology: True American Agenda
-
by 207796398873175208235380528963
September 12, 2005 10:04 AM PDT
- This is a MUST reading for those who care about the future of American IT and our national security: http://www.alexanderbell.us/Initiative/IT.htm
-
Reply to this comment
-
(77 Comments)