October 20, 2005 2:44 PM PDT

Net pirates will face stiffer punishment

Internet pirates with prerelease movies in their shared folders will face stiffer federal penalties starting Monday.

The U.S. Sentencing Commission on Wednesday approved an emergency set of rules that would boost prison sentences by roughly 40 percent for people convicted of peer-to-peer infringement of copyright works "being prepared for commercial distribution."

The changes also say judges may "estimate" the number of files shared for purposes of determining the appropriate fine and sentence. Larger numbers typically yield longer sentences.

File-swapping's definition is broadened

Old federal definition of uploading: "Uploading" means making an infringing item available on the Internet or a similar electronic bulletin board with the intent to enable other persons to download or otherwise copy, or have access to, the infringing item.

New federal definition of uploading: "Uploading" means making an infringing item available on the Internet or a similar electronic bulletin board with the intent to enable other persons to (A) download or otherwise copy the infringing item; or (B) have access to the infringing item, including by storing the infringing item in an openly shared file.

Source: U.S. Sentencing Commission

This week's sentencing adjustments arose from a law that President Bush signed in April called the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act. It gave the commission 180 days to revisit its rules to make them "sufficiently stringent to deter, and adequately reflect the nature of, intellectual property rights crimes."

The law was supported by major media organizations, including the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America. It imposes fines of up to $250,000 and prison terms of up to three years, regardless of whether any downloading of a prerelease work took place.

Another change in the sentencing guidelines alters the definition of "uploading" to make it clear that merely having a copyright file available in a shared folder--such as those used by popular file-swapping programs like Kazaa and BearShare--can count as illegal distribution.

Fred von Lohmann, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, warned that permitting courts to estimate the magnitude of a copyright infringement could prove problematic. "In civil copyright cases I would insist that the plaintiff prove the precise number of the works infringed," von Lohmann said. "It would be grossly unfair to let a court simply guess."

Under U.S. sentencing guidelines (PDF), the base offense level for uploading infringing files is 12 but can be reduced to 10 if it is noncommercial copyright infringement. The commission's emergency amendment adds two points to the offense level, boosting a typical sentence from six to 12 months to between 10 and 16 months if the person had no prior criminal history.

Last month, Curtis Salisbury, 19, pleaded guilty to violating the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act. Sentencing is scheduled to take place in a San Jose, Calif., federal court Feb. 27.

6 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
I got stiffed...
stiffy whiffy
Posted by (187 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I got stiffed...
stiffy whiffy
Posted by (187 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Who cares about U.S. Sentencing Commission
The rest of the world is rolling over the floor holding their stomach and laughing their heads off.Does anyone gives a dam about the
U.S. Sentencing Commission in the rest of the world?
Posted by cyberblatt (35 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I care even though I'm not an American
I think this is an outrageous punishment simply for file sharing. It's not like the movie companies are suffering - as it is, they make more money now on DVD's than they do on the movie releases, but still criminal punishment for copyright infringement gets more and more draconian in the US every day.

Essentially, they're throwing people - often young people like the 19-year-old mentioned in the article whos crime was that he created an abysmally bad camera copy of a movie in a theater - in jail for long life-destroying terms because they want higher profits than the obscene amounts of money they already make. It's sickening to see the government of any nation turn on its citizens in this fashion.

I for one am very pleased these days that I don't live in the once "land of the free"... what a sick joke that phrase is turning into, hoo boy.
Posted by lorcro2000 (71 comments )
Link Flag
Who cares about U.S. Sentencing Commission
The rest of the world is rolling over the floor holding their stomach and laughing their heads off.Does anyone gives a dam about the
U.S. Sentencing Commission in the rest of the world?
Posted by cyberblatt (35 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I care even though I'm not an American
I think this is an outrageous punishment simply for file sharing. It's not like the movie companies are suffering - as it is, they make more money now on DVD's than they do on the movie releases, but still criminal punishment for copyright infringement gets more and more draconian in the US every day.

Essentially, they're throwing people - often young people like the 19-year-old mentioned in the article whos crime was that he created an abysmally bad camera copy of a movie in a theater - in jail for long life-destroying terms because they want higher profits than the obscene amounts of money they already make. It's sickening to see the government of any nation turn on its citizens in this fashion.

I for one am very pleased these days that I don't live in the once "land of the free"... what a sick joke that phrase is turning into, hoo boy.
Posted by lorcro2000 (71 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.