Version: 2008

December 17, 2006 6:00 AM PST

NASA's moon base: Boondoggle or springboard to Mars?

  • 4 comments

The planned lunar outpost could be a "baby step" toward learning to live on another planet--or it could be a money pit.

The story "NASA's moon base: Boondoggle or springboard to Mars?" published December 17, 2006 at 6:00 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
It's sad that
by Macsaresafer December 17, 2006 8:10 AM PST
Americans have such short memories. Much of the technology we
take for granted today came about because of the space program.
There's every reason to believe that more effort spent on space
exploration would lead to even greater benefits. When you consider
how much we're spending bridges to nowhere and other pork, the
space budget is miniscule.
Reply to this comment
Yes
by Robadude32 December 21, 2006 10:32 AM PST
I totally agree. We have many more things to discover.
Re: It's sad that
by chuck_whealton December 22, 2006 7:46 AM PST
You make a good point.

Another point that I would consider valid is that unless we change how we live (humans in general), we're going to need another place to live.

Hopefully, there's another one out there. I look at it as we have to start somewhere.

Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
So much potential for the moon...
by Pongobongo December 19, 2006 2:44 PM PST
Mars is fascinating, it's true. But mainly to the small scientific community. Everyone on Earth has gazed up at the moon and dreamt of the possibilities. Just compare the responses of the America public to the Mars Rover missions to those of Apollo 11 touching down.

Hubble is amazing to be sure, but most of our imagery and discovery still comes from ground based observatories. Imagine building such observatories on the Moon; no atmospheric twinkling, no tectonic vibrations, and no sunlight on the dark side.

Besides the Moon offers fuel for future missions, less gravity to fight on liftoff (to Mars maybe?), and no environmental reasons to limit nuclear power options. We could even use the Moon as a remote, and dead quiet, listening post for information send from probes and rovers.

If you ask me, the International Space Station was the REAL boondoggle. The Moon was there the whole time...
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 10,520.10
S&P 500 (0.53%) 5.89 1,126.48
NASDAQ (0.71%) 16.05 2,285.69
CNET TECH (0.64%) 10.53 1,657.91
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right