September 21, 2006 4:00 AM PDT
Newsmaker: Mozilla looks to Microsoft for security
See all Newsmakers- Related Stories
-
Firefox update patches security holes
September 15, 2006 -
Microsoft offers helping hand to Firefox
August 24, 2006 -
Mozilla delays Firefox 2.0 release
August 16, 2006 -
Hackers work to exploit latest Firefox flaw
September 13, 2005 -
Bug hunters, software firms in uneasy alliance
September 6, 2005 -
Microsoft wants to meet more hackers
August 1, 2005
(continued from previous page)
Is Firefox more secure than Microsoft's Internet Explorer?
Snyder: This gets into how you measure security. I think one of the most important metrics of security is days of risk: How long does it take for a vendor to get a patch out to its customers? Then, once the patch is available, how long does it take to deploy it?
I think Mozilla has made the number of days between the time a vulnerability is identified and a patch is available incredibly small, and it is shrinking.
So the answer, in one word: Is Firefox more secure than Internet Explorer?
Snyder: I don't think there is a one-word answer for that question.
You can't say yes or no?
Snyder: You have to look at the days of risk. You have to look at the overall process, how responsive and how transparent the processes are.
Are there any security challenges that face Mozilla or its products?
Snyder: We have a tremendous opportunity, from our features perspective, to implement changes that will enhance the overall security of the product--for example, reducing the attack surface area by eliminating code that is either dead or infrequently used. There are some file-parsing engines or mechanisms that are present, but maybe for file formats that aren't widely in use.
If it does not add any benefit to the customers, it is probably only adding risks. If people aren't really using it, that code should go.
You dealt with security researchers at Microsoft and will deal with them at Mozilla. How do you see the community? There have been several cases where researchers have gone public with Firefox flaws.
Snyder: The security research community I see as another part of the Mozilla community. There's an opportunity for these people, if they get excited about the Mozilla project, to really contribute. They can contribute to secure design, they can suggest features, they can help us identify vulnerabilities, and they can help us test it. They can help us build tools to find more vulnerabilities. The spectrum is much broader (than with commercial products) in ways the research community can contribute to this project.
Did you use Firefox already before you came here?
Snyder: Oh yeah. I use everything. So at home, of course, I have Macs, I have PCs and machines running Linux. I have a broad range of platforms and software at home.
Are you working more hours now than you were working before?
Snyder: Probably, but I am spending a lot of time getting up to speed, and assessing where we are. It is a brand-new job for me, so you've got to jump in and get started. That means spending a lot of time talking to people and reading all the old bugs.
See more CNET content tagged:
@stake Inc., Mozilla Corp., security, consulting, Firefox
23 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Seriously who names their kid Window and thinks its a good name? =)
PS: Nice misleading title you got there.
/P
Bob H in NPR
As for Mozilla hiring her.....are you sure you want to hire one of the Security leads from MS?? Do you really want to hire Accountants from Enron or have Charles Manson babysit for your kids? Hell no!!! Why hire a security person from MS over to Mozilla?
Managing a team of several thousand developers and making sure they all "think, sleep and drink security" is a momentous achievement. Especially when you consider that "taking shortcuts" is almost etched into a programmer's brain in many cases.
If Windows was secure, they wouldn't be able to sell you their (MS) Antivirus software and the like.
MS needs to make money somewhere. The growth of computers is not on increasing. So selling an insecure OS, then sell you a service to protect you from the vulnerabilities, is a good way to double revenue.
If Windows was secure, they wouldn't be able to sell you their (MS) Antivirus software and the like.
MS needs to make money somewhere. The growth of computers is not on increasing. So selling an insecure OS, then sell you a service to protect you from the vulnerabilities, is a good way to double revenue.