April 5, 2004 9:45 AM PDT

Moving to Linux may not save money--yet

Migrating to open-source software may cost some companies more than simply upgrading their Unix or Windows systems, according to a study research company The Yankee Group released Monday.

Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Based on a survey of 1,000 information technology administrators and corporate executives at companies around the globe, Yankee's report concluded that the technical merits promised by Linux and applications built to run on the operating system have yet to overcome financial concerns related to adopting the software. At companies with 5,000 or fewer users, Linux can save more money than other systems, including Unix and Microsoft's Windows software, said the Boston-based company.

"Clearly, many people who have Linux like it a lot, but if you propose a wholesale swap to most large companies, you're looking at a significant up-front cost, and many executives are asking why they should do it," said Yankee analyst Laura DiDio, who authored the report.

Much of the expense of the open-source migration comes from shifting the IT architecture, DiDio said. However, many executives are reconsidering such a move because of a growing number of security threats and a dearth of experienced Linux administrators. Improved security has been one of the primary advantages Linux promises.

Another concern among users is the relatively small number of applications available on Linux, compared with Unix or Windows.

"Everyone has a Linux strategy, even if it's just to throw rocks at Microsoft," DiDio said. "But executives are asking if the advantages of Linux are substantial enough to justify the expense and inherent headaches of swapping all of their systems."

In response to the survey, Linux vendors said their customers often garner sizable savings from moving to their software. Leigh Day, a spokesman for Red Hat, the top seller of the Linux operating system, said their customers who switched say they have opportunities to spend less. Customers can also shift to cheaper hardware, specifically lower-cost Intel-based systems, she said.

According to DiDio, however, Microsoft has made inroads with many customers who were considering Linux. For example, the company has been improving its ability to protect against security threats and has reworded its product warranties to convince end users that it is willing to take on greater levels of liability than its Linux rivals.

Although Linux advocates will argue that open-source software will provide long-term savings, the analyst said executives remain unconvinced that the Linux market is currently mature enough to serve their needs.

"A lot of end users feel it's perhaps still better to deal with the devil you know than deal with the devil you don't know," she said. "They feel that it's great that Linux is out there as an alternative--in particular to Microsoft--but market maturity and the number of available applications are major concerns."

Yankee said it conducted the survey with Sunbelt Software and that the research was not sponsored by any outside company.

3 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Sun Belt Software
How can you have an unbiased Study when you use a windows Vendor?

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.sunbelt-software.com/index.cfm" target="_newWindow">http://www.sunbelt-software.com/index.cfm</a>
Posted by kbellve (30 comments )
Reply Link Flag
More News.com Idiocy
Quote from the article: "Yankee said it conducted the survey with Sunbelt Software and that the research was not sponsored by any outside company."

Hey, random news.com editor, why don't you follow the link to Sunbelt Software...what's that? Too lazy? Here: I'll do it for you. Let's read the first thing on the homepage:

"Sunbelt Software is the World's #1 Windows NT/2K/XP Tools Provider"

And you wonder why Linux/Open-Source advocates chill at the thought of another news.com article on Linux vs. Windows. It's just so obvious where news.com has it's interests in that debate.
Posted by Apostata (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Self-Selecting Sample = Biased Survey
A statistical truism: When you allow the sample
to select itself, you get biased results. In
this case, respondents were subscribers to a MS
Windows related newsletter.

I am astonished that News.com are reporting this
survery long after it has been so easily
debunked.
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.