• On BNET: 3 worst things about the iPhone 3G S

March 27, 2006 11:27 AM PST

Microsoft's Adobe rivals due after Vista

  • 15 comments
Microsoft will step up its assault on Adobe Systems' customer base with the release early next year of its Expression line of design and development software.

The three-product Expression suite, aimed at graphics designers and illustrators, will be available early next year--about 60 to 90 days after Windows Vista ships, said Forest Key, director of product management for Microsoft Expression designer tools.

Key also said the first version, or community technology preview, of Expression Web Designer will be available in June. That product is for building Web sites with JavaScript and other Web technologies.

Adobe has long supplied its programs, such as Illustrator and Photoshop, to designers and graphic artists. Through its acquisition of Macromedia, Adobe gained Web-authoring software, notably the Flash product line.

Microsoft, however, is investing in a wide range of graphics and user interface-oriented products, including its Expression products.

Last week at the Mix '06 Web developer conference, the company further detailed Windows Presentation Foundation/Everywhere, a cross-browser, multidevice user interface tool set, which some people have dubbed an Adobe Flash killer.

"We are extremely focused on the user experience...broadly in every class of application," Key said. "We are saying that the user experience matters in ways that dramatically add value to the business."

An important part of Microsoft's front-end strategy is easing communication between designers and software developers. Its Visual Studio development tool and Expression products will be able to "read" a new layout language called XAML, Microsoft said.

See more CNET content tagged:
Adobe Systems Inc., Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft Windows

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I'm no fan of Adobe....
by Earl Benser March 27, 2006 11:47 AM PST
... But MS just may have delusions of grandeur in trying to compete
with Adobe's products in the professional world.

On the other hand, since Adobe doesn't give a damn about the
non-professional user. maybe MS can come up with something
useful to most of us.

It would be nice to have.....
Reply to this comment
Kill Flash? I got a bridge for sale...
by qprize March 27, 2006 12:43 PM PST
First, MS can barely get Powerpoint to work, nevermind a real
graphics package. Second, the only way they have a chance to
bump off Flash is by deliberately making Vista incompatible. And
besides doing it to WordPerfect when it was the number one word
processor, and AOL when it was the number one ISP, and Netscape
when it was the number one browser, when else have they actually
done that? Of course, this might explain the delay in the release of
Vista...
Reply to this comment
MS? Pro Graphics? please.
by Fritzw March 27, 2006 1:17 PM PST
I don't love Adobe, or Macromedia. The only program I truly love
working in is Photoshop. It just works. Flash MX 2004 is buggy,
but it does work. To think that MS will give a go at this Industry
is kinda silly. I equate this Microsoft mission with their goal to
over take Google. Microsoft simply isn't the company to do it. It
isn't in their name, performance, history, or future. (I hope I am
right.) My personal opinion is that they are simply to big and out
of touch with reality outside of a Microsoft world. Furthermore
think they would have the urge to over complicate things while
also making their software compatible with their software suite
which is overly complex and somewhat dysfunctional.

MS isn't known for being in touch with there users and that is a
big part of making pro software. Macromedia and Google I view
as simple corporations with one or at least targeted goals,
Adobe a little less so but still there. Microsoft just wants every
thing and simply having that and a bunch of R/D ain't gonna do
it...
Kill Dreamweaver?
by March 28, 2006 2:27 AM PST
When FrontPage was introduced it was supposed to compete with Dreamweaver but it's not in the same league. And they haven't made any substantial improvements in years.
I serious doubt much will come of this
by unknown unknown March 27, 2006 12:59 PM PST
Photoshop and Illustrator are firmly entrenched in their target markets. There are tons of third party and user created plug-ins, brush, and scripts etc for both. Microsoft is going to have a hard time making a dent in this market.
Reply to this comment
I agree
by Roman12 March 27, 2006 2:35 PM PST
Agree 100%, Photoshop is like the image-editing equivalent of Google for websearch. It's a quality product, MS will have to spend a lot of money to make any impact at all.
______________________________
R.K.
http://www.Remove-All-Spyware.com
View reply
Any Bet That Only Microsoft's Expression will Work on Vista?
by kamwmail-cnet1 March 27, 2006 2:09 PM PST
And for some inexplicable reason, Adobe and other software won't work that well?

Gee.......
Reply to this comment
At least Adobe comes out on time....
by gnotellaluvr March 27, 2006 4:55 PM PST
Let's look at this. M$ can't get Windows out in 5 years. But we are supposed to believe that within 60-90 days after Vista's release. Please..... I have yet to see Macromedia/Adobe miss a release date.
Reply to this comment
Rival to Adobe?
by Bryan777 March 28, 2006 7:19 AM PST
How in the world can Microsoft challenge Adobe? Microsoft's
graphics software will only embolden "wannabe" designers to fill
the world with awful looking graphics such as stuff created by
Frontpage, PowerPower, Publisher and even Word. Everybody
knows that all the worst looking stuff come from Microsoft
software. When you visit a horrible website and check the
source, you find none other than "Created using Frontpage."

They have ZERO chance of luring any professional away from
outstanding Abobe/Macromedia software. When I accept
resumes for graphic/web design freelancers or hire people to
work in our organization, if Microsoft software is prominently
listed, the applicant's resume goes in the round file. Note to
aspiring professionals: Steer clear of all Microsoft graphics/web
design software, even if you get it for free.

MS needs to concentrate on getting Vista and XBox out. Leave
the graphics to Abode and Apple.
Reply to this comment
Give me a Break
by swilson2000 March 28, 2006 7:47 AM PST
I've been using Dreamweaver and Fireworks for a while.. I refuse to do anything in frontpage I would rather code HTML, XHTML etc.. by hand then use that program.. It add in too much junk to the code that is not needed and it doesn't do some of the things I would like especially in working with graphic as Dreamweaver and Fireworks work good together in that department...

I'll keep using my Macromedia programs..
Reply to this comment
Graphics? Java?
by ewelch March 28, 2006 8:11 AM PST
So, this MS software will create java for websites?

What flavor of Java. Will it work with anything but IE?

Why would anyone in their right mind use Microsoft products
when there's something out there that's better?

Just ask Mac users.

Be very afraid...
Reply to this comment
go adobe!
by alek_nedic April 18, 2006 2:13 PM PDT
http://www.analogstereo.com/vacuum/miele_s5310_vacuum_sbb.htm
Reply to this comment
Remember MIC and PhotoStory 2000?
by rezlab May 17, 2006 1:17 PM PDT
I wouldn't worry about replacing my Photoshop or even Fireworks applications. A number of years ago Microsoft developed Microsoft Image Composer - a great vector/bitmap application, that was replaced by PhotoDraw2000 that was a pretty good application that was replaced by ??? In each case an above average application was rolled out, only to vanish within 2 or 3 years. Anybody remember when Visio was last updated? I really doubt MS's commitment to any desktop applications beyond the MS Office Suite.
Reply to this comment
Unfortunately they will get the Adobe interface.
by Akiba June 27, 2006 1:21 PM PDT
Adobe plans on discontinuing freehand and giving Fireworks/Dreamweaver a more Adobe like interface. It really pisses me off because I used Macromedia apps because they were more productive and I preffered their interface. Adobe really does need a rival like Macromedia was. Unfortunately Microsoft doesn't really the creative design sense to pull it off.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Adobe Systems (-3.56%) -1.02 27.64
Microsoft (-2.79%) -0.67 23.37
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 8,280.74
S&P 500 (-2.91%) -26.91 896.42
NASDAQ (-2.67%) -49.20 1,796.52
CNET TECH (11.32%) 149.69 1,472.57
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right