About one in every seven clicks on an advertisement is estimated to be fraudulent, and Microsoft is trying to make that kind of deception more expensive for perpetrators.
The New York Times
The story "Microsoft sues three in click-fraud scheme" published June 15, 2009 at 9:30 PM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.





Get those crooks.
So much for that theory.
If you claim ignorance long enough, you might get excused. They need to join up now with MSFT to avoid a nasty embarassment (and possible litigation) later from the customers.
What you don't see is much of any resolution on Google's part ot fix it or give refunds. :/
I applaud Microsoft's efforts here. Their effort will benefit advertisers (the little guy :)) and hopefully set a precedent that will entice others to follow suit. Hopefully, www.bing.com will give them enough share to give advertisers a bargaining chip with Google in case of customer issues like those reported in this post: "Hey Google, these clicks seem fake. I'd like to get a refund, otherwise I'll take my dollars to bing".
I think the competition in this landscape on the side of the search engines will lead to a lot of good wins for consumers in the search ecosystem. This lawsuit is such an example.
most porn, illegal file sharing and malicious web pages only exist to reap clicks.
There are so many "empty" pages that soon they'll outnumber real information (if they haven't already).
Advertiser don't care where the clicks come from and will only make token efforts if they think they're totally fake - they really don't care if they're real but supporting immoral/illegal sites.
- by sundance808 June 16, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
- this is why my company stopped advertising in google.. I couldnt believe the number of the clicks we 'supposedly' got from the ad posting, I suspected something fishy was going on with or without google knowing and this validates it.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)